0
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Probabilistic Approach to the Evaluation of the PTS Issue

[+] Author and Article Information
R. D. Cheverton, D. L. Selby

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-8056

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 114(4), 396-404 (Nov 01, 1992) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2929245 History: Received May 05, 1991; Revised August 24, 1992; Online June 17, 2008

Abstract

An integrated probabilistic approach for the evaluation of the pressurized-thermal-shock (PTS) issue was developed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) at the request of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The purpose was to provide a method for identifying dominant plant design and operating features, evaluating possible remedial measures and the validity of the NRC PTS screening criteria, and to provide an additional tool for estimating vessel life expectancy. The approach was to be integrated in the sense that it would include the postulation of transients; estimates of their frequencies of occurrence; systems analyses to obtain the corresponding primary-system pressure, downcomer coolant temperature, and fluid-film heat-transfer coefficient adjacent to the vessel wall; and a probabilistic fracture-mechanics analysis using the latter data as input. A summation of the products of frequency of transient and conditional probability of failure for all postulated transients provides an estimate of frequency of vessel failure. In the process of developing the integrated-pressurized-thermal-shock (IPTS) methodology, three specific-plant analyses were conducted. The results indicate that the NRC screening criteria may not be appropriate for all U.S. pressurized-water-reactor (PWR) plants; that is, for some PWRs, the calculated mean frequency of vessel failure corresponding to the screening criteria may be greater than the “primary-acceptance-criterion” value in Regulatory Guide 1.154 . A recent review of the ORNL IPTS study, which was completed in 1985, indicates that there are a number of areas in which the methodology can and should be updated, but it is not clear whether the update will increase or decrease the calculated probabilities.

Copyright © 1992 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In