0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Changes in Residual Stress in Worked Surface Layer of Type 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel Due to Tensile Deformation

[+] Author and Article Information
Makoto Hayashi, Kunio Enomoto

Mechanical Engineering Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Ibaraki 300, Japan

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 123(1), 130-134 (Oct 02, 2000) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1339006 History: Received March 09, 1999; Revised October 02, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Committee on X-ray Material Strength, 1969, “X-ray Study on Fatigue (I),” J. Jpn. Soc. Mater. Sci., 18 , pp. 679–684.
Committee on X-ray Material Strength, 1969, “X-ray Study on Fatigue (II),” J. Jpn. Soc. Mater. Sci., 18 , pp. 684–688.
Kodama,  S., 1972, “Residual Stress and Fatigue Strength,” J. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., 75, pp. 1026–1030.
Kodama, S., 1971, “On the Decrease of Residual Stress Due to Cyclic Stress,” Proc., X-Ray Extension Seminar, pp. 43–49.
Hayashi,  K., and Doi,  S., 1970, “The Effect of Tensile and Compressive Deformations on Fatigue Strength of Carbon Steel,” J. Jpn Soc. Mater. Sci., 19, pp. 1075–1080.
Hayashi,  K., and Doi,  S., 1971, “The Effect of Torsional Deformation on the Fatigue Strength of Carbon Steel,” J. Jpn. Soc. Mater. Sci., 20, pp. 1300–1306.
Kodama,  S., 1971, “Effect of Residual Stress on Fatigue Strength,” Mach. Des., 15, pp. 20–26.
Akashi, M., 1980, “Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Sensitized Stainless Steel in BWR Environment,” Corrosion Engineering, 29 , pp. 142–151.
Shimizu,  T., Enomoto,  K., Sakata,  S., and Sagawa,  W., 1984, “Residual Stress in Girth Butt Welded Pipes and Treatments to Modify These,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 16, pp. 299–319.
Goto,  T., 1974, “Application of X-Ray Diffraction to Structural Materials,” Mitsubishi Heavy Industry Review, 11, pp. 382–389.
Hayashi, M., and Enomoto, K., 1965, “Reliability Evaluation of Power Generating Equipments by X-Ray Stress Measurements,” Proc., Workshop on X-ray Material Strength, J. Japan Society for Materials Science, pp. 83–92.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Shape and dimensions of specimen
Grahic Jump Location
Surface conditions of specimen—(a) ground surface, (b) milled surface
Grahic Jump Location
Residual stress change of ground surface
Grahic Jump Location
Residual stress change of milled surface
Grahic Jump Location
Residual stress change of side surface worked by end-mill side surface
Grahic Jump Location
Residual stress distributions near specimen surface before and after stretching
Grahic Jump Location
Half-value width distributions near specimen surface before and after stretching
Grahic Jump Location
Interpretation of residual stress change of work-hardened surface layer due to tensile deformation
Grahic Jump Location
Residual stress change mechanism

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In