0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Prediction of Crack Initiation Direction for Surface Flaws Under Biaxial Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Abdennour C. Seibi

Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khod 123, Oman

Sam Y. Zamrik

Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 125(1), 65-70 (Jan 31, 2003) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1521712 History: Received December 04, 2001; Revised August 19, 2002; Online January 31, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Angled crack representation
Grahic Jump Location
Crack angle versus biaxiality ratio, α
Grahic Jump Location
Crack initiation angle versus crack angle for a uniaxial loading case
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of the proposed and Ling and Woo methods with experimental data
Grahic Jump Location
Crack trajectory for biaxiality ratio of −0.45, inclined surface flaw with β=45 deg and Δσ=140.66 MPa
Grahic Jump Location
Crack trajectory for biaxiality ratio of −0.45, inclined surface flaw with β=60 deg and Δσ=140.66 MPa
Grahic Jump Location
Total crack length versus elapsed cycles for rhombic plates of biaxiality ratio of α=−0.45
Grahic Jump Location
Total crack length versus elapsed cycles for rhombic plates of biaxiality ratio of α=−1.0
Grahic Jump Location
Crack growth rate versus ΔK, (MPa mm)
Grahic Jump Location
Crack growth rate versus ΔS(N2/mm3)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In