0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Yield Criterion for Thin Perforated Plates With Square Penetration Pattern

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Bhattacharya

Reactor Safety Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India

V. Venkat Raj

Health, Safety and Environment Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, India

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 126(2), 169-178 (May 05, 2004) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1687383 History: Received October 28, 2002; Revised August 28, 2003; Online May 05, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Rotation of applied stress in equivalent solid material
Grahic Jump Location
Layout for square pentration pattern (3×3) under biaxial loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=20 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=30 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=30 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=50 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=50 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=70 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=70 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=20 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=20 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=30 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=30 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=50 percent, pitch direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (Tresca), η=50 percent, diagonal direction of loading
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of polynomial yield functions with FEM results (von Mises), η=20 percent, pitch direction of loading

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In