0
Article

Information Fusion Technique for Evaluating Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

[+] Author and Article Information
J. A. Wang, S. Konduri, N. S. V. Rao

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, Telephone: 865-574-2274

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 127(1), 98-104 (Mar 15, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1858926 History: Received September 08, 2004; Revised November 23, 2004; Online March 15, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wang, J. A., August 1997, Embrittlement Data Base, Version 1, NUREG/CR-6506 (ORNL/TM-13327), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stallmann, F. W., Wang, J. A., Kam, F. B. K., and Taylor, B. J., 1994, “PR-EDB: Power Reactor Embrittlement Data Base, Version 2,” NUREG/CR-4816, ORNL/TM-10328/R2.
Rao,  N. S. V., 1999, “Multiple Sensor Fusion Under Unknown Distributions,” J. Franklin Institute,336, no. 2, pp. 285–299.
Rao, N. S. V., 2002, “Multisensor Fusion Under Unknown Distributions: Finite Sample Performance Guarantees,” in Multisensor Fusion, Proc. NATO Adv. Study Institute on Multisensor Data Fusion, Perthshire, Scotland, June 25–July 7, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
Rao,  N. S. V., 2001, “On Fusers That Perform Better Than Best Sensor,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 23, no. 8, pp. 904–909.
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G., 2001, Pattern Classification, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York).
Rao,  N. S. V., and Protopopescu,  V., 1996, “On PAC Learning of Functions With Smoothness Properties Using Feedforward Sigmoidal Networks,” Proc. IEEE, 84, no. 10, pp. 1562–1569.
Wang, J. A., March 1999, “Development of Embrittlement Prediction Models for U.S. Power Reactors,” pp. 525–540 in Effect of Radiation on Materials: 18th International Symposium, ASTM STP 1325.
Rao, N. S., 2002, “Nearest Neighbor Projective Fuser for Function Estimation,” Proc. Conf. On Information Fusion.
Mansur, L. K., 1987, “Mechanisms and Kinetics of Radiation Effects in Metals and Alloys,” Kinetics of Nohomogeneous Processes, ed. by Gorden R. Freeman.
Wang, J. A., March 2000, “Analysis of the Irradiated Data for A302B and A533B Correlation Monitor Materials,” pp. 59–80 in Effect of Radiation on Materials: 19th International Symposium ASTM STP 1366, ASTM, Philadelphia.
Wang, J. A., Kam, F. B. K., and Stallmann, F. W., August, 1996, “Embrittlement Data Base (EDB) and Its Applications,” Effects of Radiation on Materials: Vol. 17, ASTM STP 1270, pp. 500–521.
Guthrie, G. L., 1983, Charpy Trend Curves Based on 177 PWR Data Points, NUREG/CR-3391, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Odette, G. R., Lombrozo, P. M., Perrin, J. F., and Wullaert, R. A., 1984, Physically Based Regression Correlations of Embrittlement Data From Reactor Pressure Vessel Surveillance Programs, EPRI NP-3319, Electric Power Research Institute.
Fisher, S. B., and Buswell, J. T., 1986, A Model for PWR Pressure Vessel Embrittlement, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Central Electric Generating Board, GL139PB.
Lowe, A. L., Jr., and Pegram, J. W., May 1991, Correlations for Predicting the Effects of Neutron Radiation on Linde 80 Submerged-Arc Welds, BAW-1803, Rev. 1.
Brillaud, C., Hedin, F., and Houssin, B., 1987, “A Comparison Between French Surveillance Program Results and Predictions of Irradiation Embrittlement,” Influence of Radiation on Material Properties, ASTM STP 956, pp. 420–447.
Randall, P. N., 1986, “Basis for Revision 2 of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Regulatory Guide 199,” Radiation Embrittlement of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels: An International Review (Second Volume), ASTM STP 909, pp. 149–162.
Eason, E. D., Wright, J. E., and Odette, G. R., 2000, Improved Embrittlement Correlations for Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels, NUREG/CR-6551, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Hassoun, M. H., 1995, Fundamentals of Artificial Neural Networks (MIT Press,
Rao,  N. S. V., 2000, “Finite Sample Performance Guarantees of Fusers for Function Estimators,” Information Fusion,1, no. 1, pp. 35–44.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
ORNL 1 Model’s residual for GE BWR base data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 26.05°F
Grahic Jump Location
ORNL 1 Model’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 43.38°F
Grahic Jump Location
ORNL 2 Model’s residual for GE BWR base data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 25.52°F
Grahic Jump Location
ORNL 2 Model’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 41.71°F
Grahic Jump Location
Guide 1.99/R2’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 49.6°F
Grahic Jump Location
Guide 1.99/R2’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 59.4°F
Grahic Jump Location
Eason Model’s residual for GE BWR base data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 37.15°F
Grahic Jump Location
Eason Model’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 55.49°F
Grahic Jump Location
Linear Fuser Model’s residual for GE BWR base data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 23.42°F
Grahic Jump Location
Linear Fuser Model’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 33.89°F
Grahic Jump Location
KNN-Fuser Model’s residual for GE BWR base data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 16.84°F
Grahic Jump Location
KNN-Fuser Model’s residual for GE BWR weld data, with 2 sigma uncertainty of 21.22°F

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In