0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Analysis on the Dynamic Load in a Water Pool during Air Discharge from Submerged Sparger

[+] Author and Article Information
Ken Uchida, Takeshi Shimizu, Mitsuo Komuro

Power & Industrial Systems R&D Center, Toshiba Corporation, 8 Shinsugita-Cho, Isogo-Ku, Yokohama-Shi 235-8523, Japan

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 127(4), 495-501 (Apr 04, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2043201 History: Received December 19, 2004; Revised April 04, 2005

This paper presents a study of the applicability of the VOF (volume of fluid) method to estimation of dynamic load in a water pool induced by oscillation of bubbles that are ejected through sparger holes. We choose the VOF method to simulate this phenomenon, and the pressure of a bubble is given by entropy change in order to consider the compressible effect of the bubble and the effect of gas coming into the bubble. In calculation of the airflow rate passing through the holes, the effect of two-phase pressure drop is incorporated. In order to investigate applicability of this method, a simplified blowdown test is carried out. According to the numerical results, the pressure-time history inside the sparger and that in a water pool are both generally reproduced well with analysis, except that the magnitude of first peak pressure in a water pool is overestimated. The most likely reason is that the bubble cloud has especially low void fraction at the early stage of bubble formation, and small bubbles around a major bubble work as a buffer, which is discussed, in detail, in this paper.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Velocity vector at the holes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Pressure-time history

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Pressure-time history from P4 (enlargement)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Bubble shape (left: analysis, right: experiment)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Conceptual diagram of bubble cloud

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Experimental apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic diagram of the test section

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Computational grid model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Grid model used in preanalysis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Pressure variation on the pipe wall

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In