0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Projectile Driving Band Interactions With Gun Barrels

[+] Author and Article Information
Tony D. Andrews

 QinetiQ, Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 0LX, United Kingdomtdandrews@qinetiq.com

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 128(2), 273-278 (Jan 03, 2006) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2172965 History: Received December 07, 2005; Revised January 03, 2006

This paper discusses results from a series of trials carried out to determine the effect of the projectile driving band on the stress applied to a 155mm gun barrel during firing. The interference between the driving band and gun barrel can apply significant loads to the barrel and, in extreme cases, lead to premature cracking and failure of the barrel. Strain gage data from firing trials has been used to characterize the external strain from firing different projectiles and charges to identify potential problems and provide information for fatigue analysis. Very high band strains were routinely measured under “oiled bore” conditions, i.e., after barrel cleaning and also during the first one to three rounds of a serial following a long pause in firing, such as at the start of a day’s firing. In general, the strain associated with the driving band was seen to decrease with increased charge zone, barrel wear, and, at higher charge zones, distance along the barrel. In the majority of tests fired at maximum charge, there was no strain peak associated with the driving band in the forward part of the barrel. In conjunction with these experimental observations, a laboratory study has been carried out on the effect of a narrow pressure band on the deformation of a thick-walled tube. An apparatus was constructed in order to pressurize a known length of a smooth-bore cylinder. Sealing width at the edges of the band was minimized to reduce edge effects, and an oversize pressurized “cap” was used to ensure that the bandwidth remained constant during the experiments. Spacer disks were used to vary the bandwidth and also to adjust the cylinder position relative to the band. Measured external strains on the tubes were compared to calculations based on analytical solutions for step pressure changes and are shown to be in good agreement.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of applied stress and strains

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Typical trials strain gage results (low zone)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Typical trials strain gage results (high zone)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Gas pressure calculated from strain gage results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Intermediate charge zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Band pressure versus position and charge zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

First round: low zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Second round: high zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Third round: high zone

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Effect of firing on maximum strains observed

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Effect of projectile type on band strains

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Peak strain during intensive fire

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Estimated effective fatigue pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Band pressure test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Experimental assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Comparison of measured and calculated strains

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In