0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Laboratory Heat Transfer Experiments on a 155mm Compound Gun Tube With Full Length Integral Mid-Wall Cooling Channels

[+] Author and Article Information
Mark Bass

 QinetiQ Ltd., Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN14 7BP, UKmjbass@qinetiq.com

Rolf R. de Swardt

 Denel (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 7710, Pretoria, 0001, South Africarolfd@liw.denel.co.za

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 128(2), 279-284 (Jan 17, 2006) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2179434 History: Received December 22, 2005; Revised January 17, 2006

A 155 mm compound gun barrel with full-length integral mid-wall cooling channels was manufactured and connected to a purpose built heat exchanger. Laboratory testing of this system was carried out using electrical heating jackets applied to the outer surface of the barrel and an internal electrical chamber heater to heat the barrel as uniformly as possible along its length. A series of tests were then carried out consisting of first heating the barrel to a uniform temperature of approximately 80°C followed by switching on the heat exchanger and monitoring the rate at which the barrel cooled. The purpose of these tests was to determine the optimum cooling characteristics of the system by studying the effect of different coolant flow rates combined with one or both radiators functioning and also the effect of using different cooling fluid solutions. Having derived the optimum flow rate and coolant solution combination a further cooling test was carried out with the heat exchanger configured to these optimum values and with the barrel heaters operating at maximum capacity. Finally a natural cooling test was undertaken where the barrel was uniformly heated to 160°C, the heating jackets removed and the barrel left to cool overnight. The results from these tests prove that natural cooling is dramatically slower than forced mid-wall cooling.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Temperature controller

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Bore surface temperature measurement gauges

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Temperature versus time curve for a 16lpm flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Summary of the forced cooling results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Summary of the natural cooling results plotted against forced cooling results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Typical cross section temperature profile

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Cooling rate versus numerical predictions—natural cooling

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Cooling rate against numerical predictions with forced cooling

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In