0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Thermal Shock Cracking: Design and Assessment Guidelines

[+] Author and Article Information
John W. Price

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Monash University,Clayton, Vic, 3800, Australiajohn.price@eng.monash.edu.au

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 129(1), 125-132 (Mar 01, 2006) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2389029 History: Received August 09, 2005; Revised March 01, 2006

Repeated thermal shock cracking is common in the operation of pressure equipment where water and steam are present. Surprisingly, it is not fully covered in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel code nor in fitness-for-purpose recommended practice such as API 579. An example of thermal shock stresses occurs when hot surfaces are exposed to splashing of cold water. This eventually may lead to crack nucleation and crack growth. However, not all thermal shock cracks lead to failures (such as rupture, leak, or, in more brittle material, fragmentation), indeed the most frequent situation is that the cracking arrests at a depth of a few millimeters. This paper presents a unique experimental study and analysis of the information being gained from this study in terms of design guidelines and crack growth mechanisms. In the experiments, cracks are initiated and then grown in low carbon steel specimens exposed to repeated thermal shock. The test-rigs achieve large thermal shocks through the repeated water quenching of heated flat plate specimens. The effect of steady state loads on the growth and environmental effects due to the aqueous nature of the testing environment are found to be major contributors to the crack growth kinetics. The most important findings are that the conditions leading to both the initiation and the arrest of cracks can be identified and that the depth of a starter notch contributes little to the crack propagation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Distribution of thermal shock and mechanical stress across a section.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Cracking from external corners such as at penetrations. (b) Cracking at internal corners. (c) Examples of geometrical details affecting thermal shock cracking from power stations. Left at the intersection of two drain lines. Right in an economizer inlet header.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Experiment design. Left, vertical furnace; right horizontal furnace. Full details of the experiment design are given in Ref. 6

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Maximum stress intensity factor profiles during 7s shock from 370°C, with and without 90MPa primary load

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Crack growth rate versus crack length (includes notch depth) for a number of cracks in the vertical furnace experiments. T=maximum cycle temperature (°C), P=primary mechanical load (MPa), Q=quenching time (time of water application) in seconds. Starting notch depth, ao, is 3.5mm for all cases. The meaning of “Best fit” and “Conservative” lines are described in relation to Eq. 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Data generated during horizontal rig experiments. Crack growth rate versus crack length for various notch depths, ao.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

A thermal shock crack at 20 times magnification from (a) the side, and (b) fracture surface. The various growth regimes are indicated 90MPa loaded specimen with top temperature of 400°C.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Two cases differing only in applied mechanical loading. The applied 90MPa loading shows a higher level of HSF growth and an area of corrosion dominated growth. A picture of this crack is shown in Fig. 7. Data drawn from Fig. 5, 7s quench.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Smoothed experimental crack growth data plotted against a Gabetta (11) model prediction, allowing for the effects of environment and primary load. Experimental data for dissolved oxygen (“DO”) =8ppm plotted.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Corrosion dominated growth region for thermal shock cracking

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In