0
RESEARCH PAPERS

High-Temperature Heat Exchanger Tube-Sheet Assembly Investigation With Computational Fluid Dynamics

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael A. Porter

 Dynamic Analysis, 2815 Stratford Road, Lawrence, KS 66049mike@dynamicanalysis.com

Dennis H. Martens

 Black & Veatch Pritchard Corporation, 11401 Lamar, Overland Park, KS 66211martensdh@bv.com

Thomas Duffy

 Motiva Enterprises, Highway 70 at 44, PO Box 37, Convent, LA 70723tmduffy@motivaenterprises.com

Sean McGuffie

 Porter McGuffie, Inc., 544 Columbia Drive, Suite 19, Lawrence, KS 66049sean@3dmet.com

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 129(2), 313-315 (Nov 20, 2006) (3 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2716436 History: Received May 17, 2006; Revised November 20, 2006

Many modern sulfur recovery unit process waste heat recovery exchangers operate in high-temperature environments. These exchangers are associated with the thermal reactor system where the tube-sheet–tube-ferrule assemblies are exposed to gasses at temperatures approaching 3000°F. Because sulfur compounds are present in the process gas, the carbon steel tube sheet and tubes in the assembly will be deteriorated by sulfidation as the operating metal temperature rises above 600°F. Ferrule systems are used to protect the carbon steel from exposure to excessive temperatures. The temperature distribution in the steel tube-sheet–tube-ferrule system is affected by process gas flow and heat transfer through the assembly. Rather than depend on “assumed” heat transfer coefficients and fluid flow distribution, a computational fluid dynamics investigation was conducted to study the flow fields and heat transfer in the tube-sheet assembly. It was found that the configuration of the ferrule installation has a large influence on the temperature distribution in the steel materials and, therefore, the possible sulfidation of the carbon steel parts.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

CFD 2D axisymmetric model configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Tubesheet assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Typical ferrule layout on tubesheet

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Ferrule configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

FE 2D axisymmetric model indicated temperature profile

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

CFD 3D model configuration

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In