0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Motion Analysis of Pendulum Type Isolation Systems During Earthquakes (Probabilistic Study of Isolation Performance of Base Isolated Structure Considering Characteristic Dispersion of Pendulum Type Isolation Systems)

[+] Author and Article Information
Shigeki Okamura

 Graduate School of Tokyo Denki University, 2-2 Kanda-Nisiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8457, Japanshigeokamu@yahoo.co.jp

Satoshi Fujita

 Tokyo Denki University, 2-2 Kanda-Nisiki-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8457, Japansfujita@cck.dendai.ac.jp

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 129(3), 507-515 (Jul 05, 2006) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2748831 History: Received December 16, 2005; Revised July 05, 2006

Most of the base isolated buildings or structures are built on laminated rubber bearings in order to give them certain natural periods. This situation, however, also encourages structural engineers to research and develop nonrubber-type isolation systems such as linear motion bearing isolators and friction pendulum systems. It is considered that the nonrubber-type isolation systems can be applied to important industrial facilities, such as LNG tanks, boiler facilities, and so on, to refine their seismic reliabilities. This device of a nonrubber-type isolation system uses the energy loss associated with sliding to reduce the deleterious effects of earthquakes. However, when using nonrubber-type isolation systems with sliding in the atmosphere, long term durability of the systems must be taken into account. It may be difficult to maintain the friction coefficient of the system. In this paper, a stochastic study of the effect on rotational motion and isolation performance of two structures subjected to an earthquake with a friction pendulum bearing is analyzed with a Monte Carlo method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Friction pendulum bearing

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Monte Carlo simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Analysis model-1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Analysis model-2

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Model coordinates

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Algorithm for phase change

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Determination of phase

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Convergence of average and standard deviation of maximum rotational angle

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Average and existence range of maximum response (analysis model-1)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Average and existence range of maximum response (analysis model-2)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Configuration of device

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Rotational motion of structure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Dispersion of center of friction force

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Distance of center of friction and center of gravity for the number of devices

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In