0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Theoretical Determination of Modal Damping Ratio of Sloshing Using a Variational Method

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Utsumi

Department of Machine Element, Technical Research Laboratory, IHI Corporation, 1 Shinnakaharacho, Isogo-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa Prefecture 235-8501, Japanmasahiko_utsumi@ihi.co.jp

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 133(1), 011301 (Jan 21, 2011) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4002057 History: Received February 15, 2010; Revised June 17, 2010; Published January 21, 2011; Online January 21, 2011

This paper investigates a variational method for theoretically determining the first damping ratio of sloshing in cylindrical and arbitrary axisymmetric tanks. In this method, a virtual work expression for the viscous terms in the Navier–Stokes equations is transformed into the first-mode damping term, thereby extending Hamilton’s principle for nonviscous sloshing to a variational principle of viscous sloshing. By applying the Galerkin method to the variational principle, a computationally efficient analysis is conducted. For arbitrary axisymmetric tanks, a method for reducing the influence of the change in the fluid velocity boundary condition on the damping estimation is investigated. The proposed method provides theoretical foundations for past empirical results for cylindrical and spherical tanks.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Comparison with earlier experimental results given in Ref. 2; half-full spherical tank; chain line, present analysis; solid line, experimental equation given by Ref. 4

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Sloshing mass normalized by mass of the liquid, which completely fills the tank

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Logarithmic decrement δd=2πζd of sloshing in spherical tank; filling level 0.64, ρf=1000 kg/m3; , present analysis; ●, Eq. 55 modified by multiplying by 0.64; (a) δd versus μ (a=0.076 m, g=9.8 m/s2); (b) δd versus a (μ=0.0011 N s/m2, g=9.8 m/s2); (c) δd versus g (a=0.076 m, μ=0.0011 N s/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Logarithmic decrement δd=2πζd of sloshing in spherical tank; ρf=1000 kg/m3, a=0.076 m, μ=0.0011 N s/m2, g=9.8 m/s2; thin solid line, present analysis without correction; thick solid line, present analysis with correction; dotted line, Eq. 55 modified by multiplying by 0.64

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Numerical results for nonviscous sloshing in spherical tank; , present analysis; ●, Refs. 12-14; (a) dimensionless eigenfrequency ω/(g/a)1/2; (b) sloshing mass normalized by liquid mass

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Spherical coordinates for arbitrary axisymmetric tank

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Logarithmic decrement δd=2πζd of sloshing in cylindrical tank; h/a=1, ρf=1000 kg/m3; , the present analysis; ●, calculation in Ref. 8; (a) δd versus μ (a=0.076 m, g=9.8 m/s2); (b) δd versus a (μ=0.0011 N s/m2, g=9.8 m/s2); (c) δd versus g (a=0.076 m, μ=0.0011 N s/m2)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Logarithmic decrement δd=2πζd of sloshing in cylindrical tank; ρf=1000 kg/m3, μ=0.0011 N s/m2, g=9.8 m/s2; , present analysis; ●, calculation in Ref. 8; ×, experiment in Ref. 8 (polished tank); ▲, experiment in Ref. 8 (unpolished tank)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Cylindrical tank and coordinate systems

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In