0
Research Papers: Pipeline Systems

A New OCTG Strength Equation for Collapse Under External Load Only

[+] Author and Article Information
Yong-Xing Sun1

 Drilling and Production Technology Research Institute, Guanghan 618300, China; State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, Chinayohancesun@yahoo.com.cn

Yuan-Hua Lin, Tai-He Shi

State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

Zhong-Sheng Wang, Hong-Bin Liu

 Drilling and Production Technology Research Institute, Guanghan 618300, China

Ping Liao, Xiang-Dong Shen

Northeast Sichuan Gas Field, Southwest Oil and Gas Co., Daxian 635000, China

1

Corresponding author.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 133(1), 011702 (Jan 20, 2011) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4001947 History: Received June 18, 2009; Revised May 23, 2010; Published January 20, 2011; Online January 20, 2011

The influence of manufacturing technology and imperfections on casing collapse strength is not considered in API bulletin 5C3. In the meantime, the current casing true collapse strength cannot be predicted accurately by API bulletin 5C3. For these cases, the joint API/ISO work group ISOTC67 SC5 WG2b has proposed the current API bulletin 5C3 and presented a new collapse strength model with manufacturing imperfections, such as ovality, eccentricity, residual stress, etc., which improves the casing strength calculation accuracy and benefits much more for casing strength design rather than just using API bulletin 5C3. The study on the new ISO collapse model has found that it cannot be used to predict the collapse strength of all pipe sizes, and the current study results are greatly different from actual conditions, which is not the last goal to propose API bulletin 5C3 for the joint API/ISO work group ISOTC67 SC5 WG2b. So, based on the new ISO collapse model, a new oil country tubular goods (OCGT) strength equation, “new equation” for predicting all OCTG sizes collapse strength under external load only has been presented in this paper. Numerical and experimental comparisons show that there is a safety margin appropriate to the desired target reliability level between the predictive values calculated by the new equation and test collapse data, and the new equation calculation accuracy is higher than that of API and ISO, which will make great improvements in the casing design of deep and superdeep wells on the basis of guaranteeing casing material safety.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Coefficient comparison of the yield collapse models

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Collapse test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The correlations between test collapse data and predictive values for 55ksi grade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

The correlations between test collapse data and predictive values for N80 grade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The correlations between test collapse data and predictive values for P110 grade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The correlations between test collapse data and predictive values for Q125 grade

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

The correlations between test collapse data and predictive values for non-API A110 grade

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In