Research Papers: NDE

Ultrasonic Circumferential Guided Wave for Pitting-Type Corrosion Imaging at Inaccessible Pipe-Support Locations

[+] Author and Article Information
K. Shivaraj, Krishnan Balasubramaniam, C. V. Krishnamurthy

Centre for Nondestructive Evaluation, and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India

R. Wadhwan

 Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai 400 074, India

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 130(2), 021502 (Mar 17, 2008) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2892031 History: Received January 28, 2007; Revised September 30, 2007; Published March 17, 2008

A higher order cylindrically guided ultrasonic wave was used for the detection and sizing of hidden pitting-type corrosion in the hidden crevice regions (between the pipe and the pipe supports) without lifting or disturbing the structural layout arrangement of the pipelines. The higher order circumferential guided waves were generated using a piezoelectric crystal based transducer, located at the accessible top region of the pipes, in a pulse-echo mode. By studying the experimental parameters such as dispersion, particle displacement, and wavelength of the ultrasonic guided wave modes, an appropriate higher order mode was selected for excitation using an appropriately designed acrylic angle wedge that conforms to the pipe’s outer curvature. A manual pipe crawler was designed with a provision for holding the wedge, and the essential hardware such as data acquisition card, encoder, etc., was integrated with the system so that the corrosion was mapped in real time during the scanning of the pipes. The system was validated on pipes ranging from 6in.to24in. outer diameters of wall thicknesses up to 12mm, by mapping defects as small as 1.5mm diameter and 25% penetration wall thickness. A 2D finite element model using ABAQUS ® was used to understand the wave propagation in pipe wall and its interaction with pinhole-type defects.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Phase velocity and group velocity dispersion curves for 168mm diameter and 10.5mm wall thickness steel pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Particle displacement across pipe wall thickness for selected guided wave mode at 1MHz frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Acrylic wedge with corrugations on the top and side walls

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Experimental layout of the circumferential guided wave inspection system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

CAD model of the pipe crawler

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Experimental setup with the data acquisition system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Screenshot of the real-time imaging software GUI

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Mild steel sample pipe (168mm diameter, 10.5mm wall thickness) with drilled pinhole-type defects of 75mm pitch

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

A-scan of pipe in a defect-free region

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

A-scan corresponding to (a) 100% deep defect, (b) 80% deep defect, (c) 60% deep defect, (d) 40% deep defect, (e) 20% deep defect, and (f) defect-free region of calibration pipe shown in Fig. 9. Region between the dotted lines indicates the reflection of wave from the hidden portion of the pipe support region.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

B-scan image indicating percentage metal losses in the sample pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Mapped image of the corroded region in a sample pipe taken out of service

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Energy plot for different sized defect and depth in calibration pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

(a) Reflection energy parameter (ξ) for different defect cross-sectional areas of defect and (b) plot between the squared defect depth and energy reflection parameter (ξ) for a 168mm diameter steel pipe with 10.5mm wall thickness

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

FEM 2D model of the wedge and pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Snapshots of the wave propagation in pipe at various time instants

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

A-scan from FEA simulation corresponding to (a) defect free, (b) 20% deep defect, (c) 40% deep defect, (d) 60% deep defect, and (e) 80% deep defect of 6mm wide in a pipe of 168.5mm diameter and 10.5mm wall thickness

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 18

Comparison of simulation and experimental results for the reflection energy parameter versus percentage defect depth




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In