0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

The Effect of the Distance From the Center of a Weld to the Fixed End on the Residual Stress and Stress Intensity Factor of a Piping Weld

[+] Author and Article Information
Katsumasa Miyazaki

Materials Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-8511, Japan

Masanori Numata

Consulting Engineering Department, Hitachi Engineering Co., Ltd., Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-0073, Japan

Koichi Saito

Hitachi Works, Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-8511, Japan

Masahito Mochizuki

Department of Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 131(2), 021205 (Dec 30, 2008) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3007428 History: Received April 16, 2007; Revised July 22, 2008; Published December 30, 2008

The fixed conditions of butt welds between straight pipe and the valves or pump in an actual piping system are different from those of straight pipes. However, the effect of the fixed condition on the residual stress and the stress intensity factor for the evaluation of the structural integrity of cracked piping is not clear. In this study, finite element analyses were conducted by considering the differences in the distance from the center of weld to the fixed end L, to clarify the effect of the fixed condition on the residual stress and the stress intensity factor. For 600A piping, the residual stress distribution was not affected by L. Furthermore, the stress intensity factors of circumferential cracks under the residual stress field can be estimated by using an existing simplified solution for piping.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of the piping system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Geometry of the piping model with distance from weld center to the fixed end L: (a) piping model; (b) detail in A, configuration of weld

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Residual stress distributions with L=2.5(Rt)0.5: (a) axial stress and (b) hoop stress

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Residual stress distributions with L=0.2(Rt)0.5: (a) axial stress and (b) hoop stress

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Axial residual stress distributions at the fixed end: (a) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=2.5(Rt)0.5; (b) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=0.2(Rt)0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Hoop residual stress distributions at the fixed end: (a) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=2.5(Rt)0.5; (b) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=0.2(Rt)0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Comparison of axial residual stress distributions at the fixed end and free end (distance from the center of weld, z=5.0mm): (a) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=2.5(Rt)0.5; (b) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=0.2(Rt)0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of hoop residual stress distributions at the fixed end and free end (distance from the center of weld, z=5.0mm): (a) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=2.5(Rt)0.5; (b) distance from the center of weld to fixed end, L=0.2(Rt)0.5

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Effect of distance from the center of weld to the fixed end, L on the axial residual stress distribution: (a) distance from the center of weld, z=0.0mm (the center of weld); (b) distance from the center of weld, z=3.0mm; (c) distance from the center of weld, z=5.0mm; (d) distance from the center of weld, z=10.0mm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Effect of distance from the center of weld to the fixed end, L on the hoop residual stress distribution: (a) distance from the center of weld, z=0.0mm (the center of weld); (b) distance from the center of weld, z=3.0mm; (c) distance from the center of weld, z=5.0mm; (d) distance from the center of weld, z=10.0mm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Procedure for estimation of stress intensity factors

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Mesh division of the finite element model for estimation of stress intensity factors by the nodal release method (a∕t=0.2): (a) mesh division of finite element model of piping; (b) detail in A; (c) detail in B

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Approximation of axial residual stress distribution for estimation of stress intensity factors by the simplified method (L=0.2(Rt)0.5, z=5.0mm, side of fixed end)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Example of changes in axial residual stress distribution (a∕t=0.2): (a) after welding; (b) after initiation of crack, a∕t=0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Redistributions of axial residual stress due to the crack propagation (L=0.2(Rt)0.5, z=5.0mm, fixed end)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Changes in stress intensity factor due to crack propagation estimated by the nodal release method with FEA and the simplified method (L=0.2(Rt)0.5)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In