0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Shakedown Analysis of Nuclear Components Using Linear and Nonlinear Methods

[+] Author and Article Information
Dan Vlaicu

 Ontario Power Generation, Pickering, ON, L1W 3J2, Canadadan.vlaicu@opg.com

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 132(2), 021203 (Jan 26, 2010) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4000505 History: Received July 03, 2008; Revised September 28, 2009; Published January 26, 2010; Online January 26, 2010

A cyclically loaded structure made of elastic-plastic material is considered as an elastic shakedown if plastic straining occurs in the first few cycles and the sequent response is wholly elastic. In this paper, the finite element method is used to develop upper and lower bound limits for the elastic shakedown of structures under periodic loading conditions. Linear methods using elastic compensation approach and the residual stress method derived from Melan’s theorem are used to generate the lower bound limit for the shakedown load, while the upper bound is found through a method derived from Koiter’s theorem. Furthermore, the results are compared with cycle-by-cycle method based on nonlinear material properties.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Plot between axial stress and strain

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Model 1: finite element mesh and pressure loads

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Model 1: load case 2: NSM method results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Model 1: NSM method-iterative procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Model 1: accumulated plastic strain check

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Model 2: finite element mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Model 2: interaction diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Model 2: accumulated plastic strain check

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Model 2: Analysis No. 3: displacements versus cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Model 2: Analysis No. 11: displacements versus cycles

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In