0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Effects of Initial Crack Location on Failure Assessment Curves in Dissimilar Metal Weld Joints in Nuclear Power Plants

[+] Author and Article Information
G. Z. Wang

e-mail address: gzwang@ecust.edu.cn

S. T. Tu

MOE Key Laboratory of Pressurized
System and Safety,
School of Mechanical and Power Engineering,
East China University of Science and Technology,
Shanghai 200237, China

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 7, 2011; final manuscript received March 24, 2012; published online October 18, 2012. Assoc. Editor: Kunio Hasegawa.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 134(6), 061405 (Oct 18, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006907 History: Received November 07, 2011; Revised March 24, 2012

Based on detailed three-dimensional finite element analyses, accurate, option 3, failure assessment curves (FACs) based on the R6 are constructed for a dissimilar metal weld joint (DMWJ) connecting the safe end to the pipe-nozzle of a reactor pressure vessel. The effects of initial crack location in the DMWJ structure on FACs are investigated. The results show that the plastic collapse of the DMWJ structure and the limit moment ML is mainly dominated by the plastic yield of the 316L material with lowest yield stress, and the crack locations in the DMWJ structure have less effect on the ML. When the load ratio Lr is less than 0.8, the crack locations have almost no effect on the FACs; while after the Lr is larger than 0.8, the crack locations have significant effect on the FACs. With the crack location moving from the safe end through the DMWJ toward the thickness transition in the pipe-nozzle, the FACs shift upward, which leads to a enlargement of the safe region in the failure assessment diagrams (FADs). This is mainly caused by the different properties of the materials in the DMWJ structure. To accurately assess the integrity of the DMWJ structure, the R6 option 3 FACs based on three-dimensional finite element analyses should be constructed and used for the cracks with different positions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jang, C., Lee, J., and Kim, J. S., 2008, “Mechanical Property Variation Within Inconel 82/182 Dissimilar Metal Weld Between Low Alloy Steel and 316 Stainless Steel,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85, pp.635–646. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. W., Lee, K., and Kim, J. S., 2009, “Local Mechanical Properties of Alloy 82/182 Dissimilar Weld Joint Between SA508 Gr.1a and F316 SS at RT and 320°C,” J. Nucl. Mater., 384, pp.212–221. [CrossRef]
Samal, M. K., Balani, K., and Seidenfuss, M., 2009, “An Experiment and Numerical Investigation of Fracture Resistance Behavior of a Dissimilar Metal Welded Joint,” Mech. Eng. Sci., 223, pp.1507–522. [CrossRef]
Brust, F. W., and Scott, P. M., 2007, “Weld Residual Stresses and Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking in Bi-Metal Nuclear Pipe Welds,” Proceedings of PVP2007, July22–26 , San Antonio, Texas, PVP2007-26297, CD ROM.
Ogawa, N., and Muroya, I., 2009, “Residual Stress Evaluation of Dissimilar Weld Joint Using Reactor Vessel Outlet Nozzle Mock-Up Model (Repopt-2),” Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, July26–30 , Prague, Czech Republic, Paper No. PVP2009-77269, CD ROM.
Miteva, R., and Tayloy, N., 2006, “General Review of Dissimilar Metal Welds in Piping Systems of Pressurised Water Reactors,” Including WWER Designs, Report No. EUR 22469 EN.
Chibber, R., Arora, N., and Gupta, S. R., 2006, “Use of Bimetallic Welds in Nuclear Reactors: Associated Problems and Structural Integrity Assessment Issues,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 220, p. 8. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. S., Hwang S. S., and Kim, H. P., 2009, “PWSCC Assessment of Dissimilar Weld on Steam Generator Drain Nozzle in PWR,” Proceedings of the ASME 2009 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, July26–30 , Prague, Czech Republic, Paper No. PVP2009-77715. CD ROM.
Courtin, S., and Gilles, P., 2006, “Detailed Simulation of an Overlay Repair on a 14” Dissimilar Material Weld,” 2006 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, July23–27 , Vancoucer, BC, Canada, Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93823. CD ROM.
Seifert, H. P., and Ritter, S., 2008, “Environmentally-Assisted Cracking Behavior in the Transition Region of an Alloy182/SA 508 Cl.2 Dissimilar Metal Weld Joint in Simulated Boiling Water Reactor Normal Water Chemistry Environment,” J. Nucl. Mater., 378, pp.197–210. [CrossRef]
R6, 2007, “Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects,” Procedure R6-Revision 4, Nuclear Electric Ltd., Gloucester.
Sun, H. M., Wang, G. Z., and Xuan, F. Z., 2009, “Numerical Simulation of the Ductile Crack Growth in a Weld Joint,” Proceeding of 12th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, Sept.20–23 , Jeju, Korea, CD ROM.
Wang, H. T., Wang,G. Z., Xuan, F. Z., and Tu, S. T., 2011, “Numerical Investigation of Ductile Crack Growth Behavior in a Dissimilar Metal Welded Joint,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 241, pp.3234–3243. [CrossRef]
Lei, Y. P., Shi, Y. W., Murakawa, H., and Luo, Y., 1998, “The Effect of Mechanical Heterogeneity and Limit Load of a Weld Joint With Longitudinal Weld Crack on the J-Integral and Failure Assessment Curve,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 75, pp.625–632. [CrossRef]
Zhang, M., ShiY. W., and Zhang, X. P., 1997, “Influence of Strength Mis-Matching on Crack Driving Force and Failure Assessment Curve of Weldment,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 70, pp.33–41. [CrossRef]
Song, T. K., Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. S., and Jin, T. E., 2007, “Mismatch Limit Loads and Approximate J Estimates for Tensile Plates With Constant-Depth Surface Cracks in the Center of Welds,” Int. J. Fract., 148, pp.343–360. [CrossRef]
Schwalbe, K. H., and Zerbst, U., 2000, “The Engineering Treatment Model,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 77, pp.905–918. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y. J., and Schwalbe, K. H., 2001, “Mis-Match Effects on Plastic Yield Loads in Idealized Weldments,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68, pp.163–182. [CrossRef]
Khana, I. A., and Bhasin, V., 2004, “An Estimation Procedure to Evaluate Limit Loads of Bi-Metallic Specimens,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 81, pp.451–462. [CrossRef]
Tanguy, B., Besson, J., and Piques, R., 2005, “Ductile to Brittle Transition of A508 Steel Characterized by Charpy Impact Test Part II: Modeling of the Charpy Transition Curve,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 72, pp.413–434. [CrossRef]
Itatani, M., Saito, T., and Hayashi, T., 2009, “Evaluation of Fracture Characteristics of Ni-base Weld Metal for BWR components,” 2009 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, PVP2009-77710. July23–27 , Vancoucer, BC, Canada, CD ROM.
Blandford, R. K., Morton, D. K., and Snow, S. D., 2007, “Tensile Stress-Strain Results for 304L and 316L Stainless Steel Plate at Temperature,” 2007 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, July22–26 , San Antonio, Texas, Paper No. PVP2007-16096, CD ROM.
Cravero, S., and Ruggieri, C., 2005, “Correlation of Fracture Behavior in High Pressure Pipelines With Axial Flaws Using Constraint Designed Test Specimens—Part I: Plane-Strain Analysis,” Eng. Fract. Mech, 72, pp.1344–1360. [CrossRef]
Wang, G. Z., Liu, G. H., and Chen, J. H., 2001, “Effects of Precracked Specimen Geometry on Local Cleavage Fracture Stress σf of Low Alloy Steel,” Int. J. Fract., 112, pp.183–196. [CrossRef]
2007, ABAQUS v6.7, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc.
Liu, Z. W., Wang, G. Z., Xuan, F. Z., Liu, C. J., and Tu, S. T., 2001, “Study on Failure Assessment Curves for Pressure Vessels,” Nucl. Power Eng., 32, pp.173–178.
Kim, Y. J., Oh, C. S., and Song, T. K., 2007, “Net-Section Limit Pressure and Engineering J Estimates for Axial Part-Through Surface Cracked Pipes,” ASME pressure vessels and piping division Conference, Paper No. PVP2007–26220, CD ROM.
Kim, J. S., Song, T. K., Kim, Y. J., and Jin, T. E., 2009, “Strength Mis-Match Effect on Limit Loads for Circumferential Surface Cracked Pipes,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 76, pp.1074–1086. [CrossRef]
Huh, N. S., and Kim, Y. J., 2001, “Effect of Nozzle Geometry on Leak-Before-Break Analysis of Pressurized Piping,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68, pp.1709–1722. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry and dimension for a typical pipe-nozzle of a reactor pressure vessel being connected to safe-end by the DMWJ (a) and the four materials (A, B, C, and D) and sizes composed of the DMWJ (b), A-ferritic steel A508, B-buttering Alloy 82, C-weld Alloy 182, D-austenitic stainless steel 316L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The true stress–strain curves of the four materials in the DMWJ at 340 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The meshes of the three-dimensional finite element model, (a) the whole structure, (b) dissimilar metal welded joint, and (c) the refined meshes around the crack tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The crack locations in the structure of DMWJ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

A typical failure assessment diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The limit moment ML calculated for the cracks with different locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Distributions of the equivalent plastic strain PEEQ in the DMWJ pipe structure at the limit moment ML for the crack 1 in 316L (a), crack 4 in Alloy 182 (b), crack 6 in Alloy 82 (c), and crack 10 in A 508 (d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The changes of the Je (a) and J (b) with increasing the external bending moment M for the cracks with different locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Failure assessment curves of the 12 cracks at different locations in the DMWJ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Distributions of the equivalent plastic strain PEEQ in front of the crack tips for the typical crack 1(a), crack 4(b), crack 6(c), and crack 9 (d) at the same bending moment of 17,500 kN·m

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In