0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Effect of Helix Angle on the Stress Intensity Factor of a Cracked Threaded Bolt

[+] Author and Article Information
Raghu V. Prakash

e-mail: raghuprakash@iitm.ac.in
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai 600 036, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received July 30, 2011; final manuscript received January 11, 2012; published online March 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Noel O'Dowd.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(2), 021202 (Mar 18, 2013) (12 pages) Paper No: PVT-11-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4007290 History: Received July 30, 2011; Revised January 11, 2012

The fracture behavior of a crack in a threaded bolt depends on the stress intensity factor (SIF). Available SIF solutions have approximated the threaded bolt as a circular groove, thus, the SIF predominantly corresponds to the opening mode, mode-I. As a thread in a bolt has a helix angle, the crack propagates under mixed mode conditions (opening, sliding and tearing), esp. when the crack sizes are small. This paper presents the results of SIF solutions for a part-through crack emanating from a Metric threaded bolt. A 3D finite element model with preexisting flaws was generated to calculate the SIF values along the crack front. Crack aspect ratios in the range of (0.2 < (a/c) < 1) and crack depth ratios in the range of (0.1 < (a/d) < 0.5) (where “a” is crack length, “c” is semi major axis of ellipse and “d” is minor diameter of the bolt) were considered along the crack plane for the SIF estimation. The SIF values at the midregion decreases with an increase in aspect ratio (a/c), and SIF increases when the crack depth ratio (a/d) increases in the midregion. Close to the free edges, higher SIF values was observed for crack depth and aspect ratios ranging between 0.2 and 0.6 compared to midregion. In the crack surface region, up to a crack depth ratio of 0.25, significant influence of mode-II and mode-III fracture was noted for shallow cracks (a/c < 0.2). Significant influence of mode-II and mode-III fracture was observed for semicircular cracks (a/c = 1) beyond the crack depth ratio of 0.3.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schwartz, Jr., 1950, “New Thread Form Reduces Bolt Breakage,” Int. J. Steel, 127, pp. 86–94.
Yang, F. P., and Kuang, P. J., 2005, “Fatigue Crack Growth for a Surface Crack in a Round Bar Under Multi-Axial Loading Condition,” Int. J. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 28, pp. 963–970. [CrossRef]
Raju, I. S., and Newman, J. C., 1979, “Stress Intensity Factors for a Wide Range of Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in Finite Thickness Plates,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 11, pp. 817–829. [CrossRef]
Shih, Y. S., and Chen, J. J., 2002, “The Stress Intensity Factor Study of an Elliptical Cracked Shaft,” Int. J. Nucl. Eng. Des., 214, pp. 137–145. [CrossRef]
Cai, C. Q., and Shin, C. S., 2004, “A Discussion on ‘The Stress Intensity Factor Study of an Elliptical Cracked Shaft,’ by Shih, Y. S., and Chen, J. J.,” Int. J. Nucl. Eng. Des., 227, pp. 355–358. [CrossRef]
Couroneau, N., and Royer, J., 1998, “Simplified Model for the Fatigue Growth Analysis of Surface Cracks in Round Bars Under Mode I,” Int. J. Fatigue, 20, pp. 711–718. [CrossRef]
Carpinteri, A., 1993, “Shape Change of Surface Cracks in Round Bars Under Cyclic Axial Loading,” Int. J. Fatigue, 15, pp. 21–26. [CrossRef]
Toribio, J., Sanchez-Galvez, V., and Astiz, M. A., 1991, “Stress Intensification in Cracked Shank of Tightened Bolt,” Int. J. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 15, pp. 85–97. [CrossRef]
Noda, N. A., and Takase, Y., 2003, “Generalized Stress Intensity Factors of V-Shaped Notch in a Round Bar Under Torsion, Tension, and Bending,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 70, pp. 1447–1466. [CrossRef]
Guo, W., Shen, H., and Li, H., 2003, “Stress Intensity Factors for Elliptical Surface Cracks in Round Bars With Different Stress Concentration Coefficient,” Int. J. Fatigue, 25, pp. 733–741. [CrossRef]
Sopwith, D. G., 1948, “The Distribution of Load in Screw Threads,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., IMechE Conf., 159, pp. 373–383. [CrossRef]
Toribio, J., Sanchez-Galvez, V., Astiz, M. A., and Campos, J. M., 1991, “Stress Intensity Factor Solutions for a Cracked Bolt Under Tension Bending and Residual Stress Loading,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 39, pp. 359–371. [CrossRef]
James, L. A., and Mills, J., 1998, “Review and Synthesis of Stress Intensity Factor Solution Applied to Cracks in Bolts,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 30, pp. 641–654. [CrossRef]
Mackay, T. L., and Alperin, B. J., 1985, “Stress Intensity Factors for Fatigue Cracking in High Strength Bolts,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 21, pp. 391–397. [CrossRef]
Brennan, F. P., and Dover, W. D., 1995, “Stress Intensity Factors for Threaded Connections,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 50, pp. 545–567. [CrossRef]
Zhao, H., Kuang, Z. B., and Li, Z. H., 1996, “Stress Intensity Factor for a Semi-Elliptical Surface Crack at the Thread Root of a Screwed-Pipe Joint,” Int. J. Comput. Struct., 59, pp. 419–424. [CrossRef]
Nord, K. J., and Chung, T. J., 1986, “Fracture and Surface Flaws in Smooth and Threaded Round Bars,” Int. J. Eng. Fract. Mech., 30, pp. 47–55. [CrossRef]
Ju, S. H., 1997, “Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks in Bolted Joints,” Int. J. Fract., 84, pp. 129–141. [CrossRef]
Shahani, A. R., and Habibi, S. E., 2007, “Stress Intensity Factors in a Hollow Cylinder Containing a Circumferential Semi-Elliptical Crack Subjected to Combined Loading,” Int. J. Fatigue, 29, pp. 128–140. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Surface crack nomenclature at the thread root region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stress distributions around thread root region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress concentration factor versus crack depth ratio (a/d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) 3D cracked bolt model, (b) symmetric bolt model, (c) part-through crack in a threaded bolt, (d) meshed bolt model with crack, and (e) 3D Cracked bolt model with boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) 3D bolt and nut assembly with surface crack and (b) meshed contact region with surface crack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mesh convergence test results around the crack region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Singular elements around crack front

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Influence of helix angle—variation of crack depth ratio (a/d): (a) (a/d = 0.1), (b) (a/d = 0.2), (a/d = 0.3), (c) (a/d = 0.4), and (d) (a/d = 0.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Influence of helix angle—variation of crack aspect ratio (a/c): (a) (a/c = 0.2), (b) (a/c = 0.4), (c) (a/c = 0.6), (d) (a/c = 0.8), and (e) (a/c = 1.0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Crack depth ratio versus correction factor—middle region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Crack depth ratio versus correction factor—middle region: (a) (a/c = 0.2)—middle, (b) (a/c = 0.4)—middle, (c) (a/c = 0.6)—middle, (d) (a/c = 0.8)—middle, and (e) (a/c = 1.0)—middle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Crack depth ratio versus correction factor—surface region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Crack depth ratio versus correction factor—surface region: (a) (a/c = 0.2)—surface, (b) (a/c = 0.4)—surface, (c) a/c = 0.6)—surface, (d) (a/c = 0.8)—surface, and (e) (a/c = 1.0)—surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Normalized SIF for short (a/d = 0.1) and deep (a/d = 0.5) cracks—Influence of mixed modes: (a) Influence of mode-I SIF, (b) Influence of mode-II SIF, and (c) Influence of mode-III SIF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Influence of mixed mode fracture—middle region (elliptic crack)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Influence of mixed mode fracture—elliptic crack surface region (Left side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Influence of mixed mode fracture—elliptic crack surface region (right side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Influence of mixed mode fracture—middle region (semi circular crack)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Influence of mixed mode fracture—semi circular crack surface region (left side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Influence of mixed mode fracture—semi circular crack surface region (right side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Influence of loading condition on SIF estimation—short crack (a/d = 0.1): (a) (a/d = 0.1), and (a/c = 0.2), (b) (a/d = 0.1) and (a/c = 0.6), (c) (a/d = 0.1) and (a/c = 1.0)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Influence of loading condition in SIF estimation—deep crack (a/d = 0.5): (a) (a/d = 0.5) and (a/c = 0.2), (b) (a/d = 0.5) and (a/c = 0.6), (c) (a/d = 0.5) and (a/c = 1.0)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In