0
Technical Briefs

Life Assessment of Turbine Components Through Experimental and Numerical Investigations

[+] Author and Article Information
Guicang Hou

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
BeiHang University,
Beijing 100191, China

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received April 16, 2012; final manuscript received October 21, 2012; published online March 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Allen C. Smith.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(2), 024502 (Mar 18, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1043; doi: 10.1115/1.4007962 History: Received April 16, 2012; Revised October 21, 2012

A new lifetime criterion for withdrawal of turbine components from service is developed in this paper based on finite element (FE) analysis and experimental results. Finite element analysis is used to determine stresses in the turbine component during the imposed cyclic loads and analytically predict a fatigue life. Based on the finite element analysis, the critical section is then subjected to a creep-fatigue test, using three groups of full scale turbine components, attached to an actual turbine disc conducted at 750 °C. The experimental data and life prediction results were in good agreement. The creep-fatigue life of this type of turbine component at a 99.87% survival rate is 30 h.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Lead wires of temperature monitoring

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Load spectrum of creep-fatigue test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Experimental turbine component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fatigue test in progress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

A sketch of creep-fatigue loading method for full scale turbine components

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Larson-Miller curve of GH742 superalloy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Equivalent stress for the mortise

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Equivalent stress for the tenon

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Equivalent stress of the turbine attachment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The rotational speed spectrum

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

FE model of the attachment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Strategy for creep-fatigue life assessment of turbine component

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Failed turbine blade and turbine discs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Fracture surface of turbine disc

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In