0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Two-Phase Flow-Induced Forces on Piping in Vertical Upward Flow: Excitation Mechanisms and Correlation Models

[+] Author and Article Information
M. J. Pettigrew

Fellow ASME
BWC/AECL/NSERC Chair of Fluid–Structure
Interaction,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
École Polytechnique de Montréal,
C.P. 6079, Succursale Centre-Ville,
Montréal, PQ, H3C 3A7, Canada

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 4, 2011; final manuscript received March 29, 2013; published online May 21, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jong Chull Jo.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(3), 030907 (May 21, 2013) (16 pages) Paper No: PVT-11-1198; doi: 10.1115/1.4024210 History: Received November 04, 2011; Revised March 29, 2013

Momentum variation in two-phase flow generates significant low frequency forces, capable of producing unwanted and destructive vibrations in nuclear or petroleum industries. Two-phase flow-induced forces in piping were previously studied over a range of diameters from 6 mm to 70 mm in different piping element geometries, such as elbows, U-bends, and tees. Dimensionless models were then developed to estimate the rms forces and generate vibration excitation force spectra. It was found that slug flow generates the largest forces due to the large momentum variation between Taylor bubbles and slugs. The present study was conducted with a 52 mm diameter U-bend tube carrying a vertical upward flow. Two-phase flow-induced forces were measured. In addition, two-phase flow parameters, such as the local void fraction, bubble size and velocity, and slug frequency were studied to understand the relationship between the force spectra and the two-phase flow patterns. A new two-phase flow pattern map, based on existing transition models and validated using our own local void fraction measurements and force spectra, is proposed. This paper also presents a comparison of the present dimensionless forces with those of previous studies, thus covers a wide range of geometries and Weber numbers. Finally, a dimensionless spectrum is proposed to correlate forces with large momentum variations observed for certain flow patterns.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cargnelutti, M. F., Belfroid, S. P. C., and Schiferli, W., 2010, “Two-Phase Flow-Induced Forces on Bends in Small Scale Tubes,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(4), p. 041305. [CrossRef]
Tay, B. L., and Thorpe, R. B., 2004, “Effects of Liquid Physical Properties on the Forces Acting on a Pipe Bend in Gas-Liquid Slug Flow,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 82(1), pp. 344–356. [CrossRef]
Yih, T. S., and Griffith, P., 1970, “Unsteady Momentum Fluxes in Two-Phase Flow and the Vibration of Nuclear System Components,” Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, Technical Report No. ANL-7685.
Riverin, J.-L., De Langre, E., and Pettigrew, M. J., 2006, “Fluctuating Forces Caused by Internal Two-Phase Flow on Bends and Tees,” J. Sound Vib., 298(1), pp. 1088–1098. [CrossRef]
Riverin, J.-L., and Pettigrew, M. J., 2007, “Vibration Excitation Forces Due to Two-Phase Flow in Piping Elements,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 129(1), pp. 7–13. [CrossRef]
Giraudeau, M., Pettigrew, M. J., and Mureithi, N. W., 2011, “Two-Phase Flow Excitation Forces on a Vertical U-Bend Tube,” Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, Paper No. 57103.
Taitel, Y., Bornea, D., and Dukler, A. E., 1980, “Modelling Flow Pattern Transitions for Steady Upward Gas-Liquid Flow in Vertical Tubes,” AIChE J., 26(1), pp. 345–354. [CrossRef]
Mcquillan, K. W., and Whalley, P. B., 1985, “Flow Patterns in Vertical Two-Phase Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 11(1), pp. 161–175. [CrossRef]
Jayanti, S., and Hewitt, G. F., 1992, “Prediction of the Slug-to-Churn Flow Transition in Vertical Two-Phase Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 18(1), pp. 847–860. [CrossRef]
Costigan, G., and Whalley, P. B., 1996, “Dynamic Void Fraction Measurements in Vertical Air-Water Flows,” Oxford University, Technical Report No. OUEL 2093/96.
Wang, Y. W., Pei, B. S., and Lin, W. K., 1991, “Verification of Using a Single Void Fraction Sensor to Identify 2-Phase Flow Patterns,” Nucl. Technol., 95(1), pp. 87–94.
Costigan, G., and Whalley, P. B., 1997, “Slug Flow Regime Identification From Dynamic Void Fraction Measurements in Vertical Air-Water Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 23(1), pp. 263–282. [CrossRef]
Brauner, N., and Barnea, D., 1986, “Slug/Churn Transition in Upward Gas-Liquid Flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 41(1), pp. 159–163. [CrossRef]
Mishima, K. M., and Ishii, M., 1984, “Flow Regime Transition Criteria for Upward Two-Phase Flow in Vertical Tubes,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 27(1), pp. 723–737. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. T., and Brill, J. P., 1997, “Slug to Churn Transition in Upward Vertical Two-Phase Flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(1), pp. 4269–4272. [CrossRef]
Nicklin, D. J., and Davidson, J. F., 1962, “The Onset of Instability in Two-Phase Slug Flow,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Two-phase Fluid Flow, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, Paper No. 4.
Brotz, W., 1954, “Über Die Vorausberechnung Der Absorptionsgeschwindigkeit Von Gasen in Strömenden Flüssigkeitsschichten,” Chem. Eng. Technol., 26(1), p. 470.
Fulford, G. D., 1964, “The Flow Liquids in Thin Films,” Adv. Chem. Eng., 5(1), pp. 151–236. [CrossRef]
Nusselt, W., 1916, “Die Oberflaechenkondensation Des Was Serdampfes (the Surface Condensation of Water Vapor),” Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing., 60(1), pp. 541–575.
Jayanti, S., Hewitt, G. F., Low, D. E. F., and Hervieu, E., 1993, “Observation of Flooding in the Taylor Bubble of Cocurrent Upwards Slug Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 19(3), pp. 531–534. [CrossRef]
Taylor, C. E., 1992, “Random Excitation Forces in Tube Arrays Subjected to Two-Phase Cross Flow,” Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, FSI/FIV in Cylinder Arrays in Cross-Flow, Heat Transfer Division, Anaheim, CA, Vol. 230, pp. 89–107.
Morris, D., Teyssedou, A., Lapierre, J., and Tapucu, A., 1987, “Optical Fiber Probe to Measure Local Void Fraction Profiles,” Appl. Opt., 26(1), pp. 4660–4664. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hamad, F. A., Pierscionek, B. K., and Bruun, H. H., 2000, “A Dual Optical Probe for Volume Fraction, Drop Velocity and Drop Size Measurements in Liquid-Liquid Two-Phase Flow,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 11(9), pp. 1307–1318. [CrossRef]
Dukler, A. E., Maron, D. M., and Brauner, N., 1985, “Physical Model for Predicting the Minimum Stable Slug Length,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 40(1), pp. 1379–1385. [CrossRef]
Barnea, D., Luninski, Y., and Taitel, Y., 1983, “Flow Pattern in Horizontal and Vertical Two-Phase Flow in Small Diameter Pipes,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 61(1), pp. 617–620. [CrossRef]
Brodkey, R. S., 1967, The Phenomena of Fluid Motions, Chemical Engineering, Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass.
Weisman, J., Duncan, D., Gibson, J., and Crawford, T., 1979, “Effects of Fluid Properties and Pipe Diameter on Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Horizontal Lines,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 5(6), pp. 437–462. [CrossRef]
Onoda, G. Y., and Liniger, E. G., 1990, “Random Loose Packings of Uniform Spheres and the Dilatancy Onset,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 64(22), pp. 2727–2730. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Legius, H. J. W. M., Van Den Akker, H. E. A., and Narumo, T., 1997, “Measurements on Wave Propagation and Bubble and Slug Velocities in Cocurrent Upward Two-Phase Flow,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 15(1), pp. 267–278. [CrossRef]
Barnea, E., and Mizrahi, J., 1973, “A Generalized Approach of the Fluid Dynamics of Particulate Systems I: General Correlation for Fluidization and Sedimentation in Solid Multiparticulate Systems,” Chem. Eng. J., 5(1), pp. 171–189. [CrossRef]
Park, J. W., Drew, D. A., and Lahey, R. T., Jr., 1994, “Measurement of Void Waves in Bubbly Two-Phase Flows,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 149(1), pp. 37–52. [CrossRef]
Sun, B., Yan, D., and Zhang, Z., 1999, “The Instability of Void Fraction Waves in Vertical Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 4(1), pp. 181–186. [CrossRef]
Park, J. W., Drew, D. A., and Lahey, R. T., Jr., 1998, “The Analysis of Void Wave Propagation in Adiabatic Monodispersed Bubbly Two-Phase Flows Using an Ensemble-Averaged Two-Fluid Model,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 24(1), pp. 1205–1244. [CrossRef]
Matuszkiewicz, A., Flamand, J. C., and Boure, J. A., 1987, “Bubble-Slug Flow Pattern Transition and Instabilities of Void Fraction Waves,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 13(1), pp. 199–217. [CrossRef]
Heywood, N. I., and Richardson, J. F., 1979, “Slug Flow of Air-Water Mixtures in a Horizontal Pipe: Determination of Liquid Holdup by Gamma-Ray Absorption,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 34(1), pp. 17–30. [CrossRef]
De Langre, E., and Villard, B., 1998, “An Upper Bound on Random Buffeting Forces Caused by Two-Phase Flows across Tubes,” J. Fluids Struct., 12(1), pp. 1005–1023. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Test loop and (b) test section for the 52 mm diameter U-bend tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Vertical flow regime map from Taitel et al. [7] and conditions studied for the 52 mm diameter U-bend test section. Transition boundaries are A from bubbly to slug flow, B from bubbly to finely dispersed bubbly flow, C from finely dispersed bubbly to churn flow, D to annular flow, and E from slug to churn flow. Flow patterns are identified as (I) bubbly flow, (II) finely dispersed bubbly flow, (III) slug flow, (IV) churn flow, and (V) annular flow.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Calibration procedure: (a) Set-up and (b) force signals

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Optical fibers tips

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Observed flow for conditions (a) 2, (b) 3, (c) 5, (d) 6, (e) 8, (f) 10, (g) 13, (h) 18, and (i) 20; (see Fig. 2 for identification of the flow conditions). Bubbly flow and slugs, which consist of water and bubbles, appear in white and Taylor bubbles in black, surrounded by the falling liquid film where some bubbles are observable.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Void signal for β = 25%: (a) Condition 1, (b) Condition 2, (c) Condition 4, (d) Condition 5; (flow conditions are identified in Fig. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Void signal for β = 50%: (a) Condition 6, (b) condition 7, (c) condition 9, and (d) condition 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Void signal for β = 75%: (a) Condition 11, (b) Condition 12, (c) Condition 14, (d) Condition 15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Void signal for β = 95%: (a) Condition 18 and (b) Condition 20

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Bubble size histograms for some of the conditions 2–16 (Fig. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Bubble velocity histograms for some of the conditions 2–16 (Fig. 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Proposed vertical flow pattern map and conditions studied for the 52 mm diameter U-bend test section. Transition boundaries are: A from bubbly to slug flow, B from bubbly to unstable slug flow, C from bubbly to unstable slug or churn flow, D to annular flow, E from slug to unstable slug flow, and F from unstable slug flow to churn flow. Flow patterns are identified as (I) bubbly flow, (II) slug flow, (III) unstable slug flow, (IV) churn flow, and (V) annular flow. The dotted lines represent the model from Taitel et al. [7] (Fig. 2) and the dashed line — delimits the spherical cap bubble flow regime, based only on our visual observations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Bubble velocity in * spherical cap bubble flow, + bubbly flow, ○ stable slug flow, and × unstable slug flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of the rms value of forces versus superficial mixture velocity: ▪ present study and ▴ previous results from Giraudeau et al. [6] for (a) β = 25%, (b) β = 50%, (c) β = 75%, and (d) β = 95%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Main peak frequency versus velocity for (a) β = 25%, (b) β = 50%, (c) β = 75%, and (d) β = 95%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

(a) Force spectra and (b) the superficial mixture velocity versus frequency peaks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Spectra of the averaged void signals for (a) bubbly flow from Park et al. [31] and for (b) slug flow from Matuszkiewicz et al. [34]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Dimensionless forces for various diameters and geometries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Force spectra with 52 mm and for β = 75%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Dimensionless spectra with 20 mm [6] and 52 mm diameter tube with their approximations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Dimensionless spectra model with 20 mm and 52 mm diameter tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

(a) Dimensional spectra and (b) dimensionless spectra with model (solid line) in terms of void fraction for slug, unstable slug, churn, and churn/annular flow conditions in 20 and 52 mm diameter U-tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Comparison between experiments (dotted line) and models (solid line) for slug flow in 52 mm diameter U-tube: (a) Condition 7, (b) condition 10, (c) condition 12, and (d) condition 16

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In