Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Effects of Prior Stress Relaxation on the Prediction of Creep Life Using Time and Strain Based Methods

[+] Author and Article Information
Ken U. Snowden

Australian Nuclear Science and Technology
Organisation (ANSTO),
Locked Bag 2001,
Kirrawee 2234 NSW, Australia

David W. Dean

British Energy,
Assessment Technology Group,
Barnett Way,
Barnwood, Gloucester GL4 3RS, UK

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received February 24, 2011; final manuscript received December 12, 2012; published online June 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Osamu Watanabe.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(4), 041201 (Jun 11, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-11-1061; doi: 10.1115/1.4023726 History: Received February 24, 2011; Revised December 12, 2012

A critical requirement for both next generation conventional and nuclear plants is the development of simplified inelastic design and fitness for purposes procedures that give a reasonably accurate prediction of the complex multiaxial time dependent stress strain behavior. The accumulation of this inelastic strain in the form of coupled creep-fatigue damage over time is one of the principal damage mechanisms which will eventually lead to crack initiation in critical, high temperature equipment. Two main procedures that address creep-fatigue loading are generally used, either a time fraction or a ductility exhaustion approach. It is generally accepted that these methods enable conservative predictions within a factor of 2 to 3 and hence are reliable methods for code based design and fitness for purpose type assessments. However, for complex cycles, this may not be the case; for example, prior relaxation cycles are found to accelerate the creep rupture of the material with the result that a significant reduction in creep life can be observed. An investigation was undertaken into the influence of prior relaxation on resultant failure using a typical low alloy ferritic power station steel. Both time-based and strain based methods were used to predict the damage caused by the stress relaxation cycles followed by operation at steady state. The predictions found that while ductility exhaustion methodologies based on mean properties were adequate in predicting the failure life, time fraction methods were found to be extremely nonconservative for mean properties and only lower bound solutions provided an estimate of remaining creep life. The ASME time fraction approach, using isochronous curves was found to be extremely conservative for K = 0.67, but was able to predict similar damages to ductility exhaustion when K = 1 was used. The Monkman-Grant approach resulted in predictions that erred on the conservative side. The results have implications for both current and future conventional and nuclear power stations as it may be difficult for time based approaches to account accurately for complex cycling, shakedown conditions or stress relaxation at welds.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Viswanathan, R., Coleman, R. K., and Rao, U., 2006, “Materials for Ultra-Supercritical Coal-Fired Power Plant Boilers,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 83(11–12), pp. 778–783. [CrossRef]
Corwin, W. R., Burchell, T. D., Halsey, W. G., Hayner, G. O., Katoh, Y., Klett, J. W., McGreevy, T. E., Nanstad, R. K., Ren, W., Snead, L. L., Stoller, R. E., Wilson, D. F., Complied by Hadley P. J., 2005, Updated Generation IV Reactors Integrated Materials Technology Program Plan Revision, O.R.N. Laboratory, ORNL/TM-2003/244/R2, Vol. 2.
Shah V. N., Majumdar, S., Natesan, K., 2003, Review and Assessment of Codes and Procedures for HTGR Components (NUREG/CR-6816, ANL-02/36), D.o.E.T. NRC, Washington.
Vaillant, J. C., 2008, “T/P23, 24, 911 and 92: New Grades for Advanced Coal-Fired Power Plants–Properties and Experience,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85(1–2), pp. 38–46. [CrossRef]
Manjoine, M. J., 1985, Stress Relaxation, ASME, New York, pp. 521–527.
Collins, J. A., 1993, Failure of Materials in Mechanical Design, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
Willis, M., McDonaugh-Smith, A., and Hales, R., 1999, “Prestrain Effects on Creep Ductility of a 316 Stainless Steel Light Forging,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping76(6), pp. 355–359. [CrossRef]
Snowden, K. U., Hughes, D. S., and Stathers, P. A., 1982, “Effect of Prior Fatigue on the Creep Behaviour of Type 321 Stainless Steel,” Int. J. Fatigue, 4(4), pp. 217–224. [CrossRef]
Plumbridge, W. J., 1996, “The Influence of Processing on the Fatigue and Fatigue-Creep Behaviour of Stainless Steels,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 56(1–4), pp. 502–510. [CrossRef]
Plumbridge, W. J., and Miller, K. J., 1974, Influence of Prior Fatigue Deformation on Creep Behaviour, Metals Soc., Sheffield, England, pp. 50–53.
Plumbridge, W. J., and Miller, K. J., 1975, “Influence of Prior Fatigue on Creep of a ‘Non-Heat-Treated’ Alloy Steel,” Met. Technol. (London), 2(6), pp. 249–252. [CrossRef]
Ohba, T., Kanemaru, O., Yagi, Koichi., and Tanaka, C., 1990, “Prediction of Residual Stress in Long-Term Stress Relaxation for 1Cr-Mo-V and 225Cr-1Mo Steels,” J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn., 39(442), pp. 888–894. [CrossRef]
Swindeman, R. W., 1984, “Response of Ferritic Steels to Nonsteady Loading at Elevated Temperatures,” Research on Chrome-Moly Steels. Presented at the 1984 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, ASME.
Brinkman, C. R., Strizak, J. P., Booker, M. K., and Jaske, C. E., 1976, “Time-Dependent Strain-Controlled Fatigue Behavior of Annealed 2 Cr-1 Mo Steel for Use in Nuclear Steam Generator Design,” J. Nucl. Mater., 62(2–3), pp. 181–204. [CrossRef]
Ellis, J. R., Jakub M. T., Jaske, C. E., and Utah, D. A., 1975, “Elevated Temperature Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Properties of Annealed 2-One Quarter Cr-1Mo Steel,” ASME (MPC-1), pp. 213–246.
Jaske, C. E., and Mindlin, H., 1970, “Elevated-Temperature Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of 2-1/4 Cr-1 Mo and I Cr-1 Mo-1/4 V Steels,” ASME, Symposium on 2 1/4 Chrome 1 Molybdenum Steel in Pressure Vessels and Piping, pp. 137–210.
Challenger, K. D., Miller, A. K., and Brinkman, C. R., 1981, “Explanation for the Effects of Hold Periods on the Elevated Temperature Fatigue Behavior of 2 One Quarter Cr-1Mo Steel,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 103(1), pp. 7–14. [CrossRef]
Challenger, K. D., and Vining, P. G., 1983, “Effects of Hold Period on the Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of 2 1/4 cr-1mo Steel at Elevated Temperatures,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 105(4), pp. 280–285. [CrossRef]
Tai, K., and Endo, T., 1993, “Effect of Pre-Creep on the Succeeding Creep Behavior of a 2.25Cr—1Mo Steel, Acta Metall. Mater., 29(5), pp. 643–646. [CrossRef]
Ray, A., Diwakar, B. N., Prasad, Y. N., Tiwari, Ghosh, R. N., and Whittenberger, J. D., 2007, “Long Term Creep-Rupture Behaviour of 813 K Exposed 2.25-1Mo Steel Between 773 and 873 K,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 454–455, pp. 124–131. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2010, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section III, Division 1, Subsection NH, ASME, New York.
RCC-MR, 2007, Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands, AFCEN, Paris, France.
R5, 2003, Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures, British Energy, Gloucester, Issue 3.
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, Fitness-For-Service, 2007. API Publishing, Washington, D.C.
Viswanthan, R., 1989, “Damage Mechanisms and Life Assessment of High Temperature Components,” ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio.
Skelton, R. P., 2004, “Creep and High-Temperature Failure,” Comprehensive Structural Integrity: Fracture of Materials From Nano to Macro, R.O.R.I.Milne and B.Karihaloo, eds., Elsevier, New York.
Rees, D. W. A., 1987, “Life Prediction Techniques for Combined Creep and Fatigue,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, 19(3), pp. 211–239. [CrossRef]
Spindler, M. W., 2004, “The Multiaxial and Uniaxial Creep Ductility of Type 304 Steel as a Function of Stress and Strain Rate,” Mater. High Temp., 21(1), pp. 47–54. [CrossRef]
Spindler, M. W., 2005, “The Prediction of Creep Damage in Type 347 Weld Metal—Part I: The Determination of Material Properties From Creep and Tensile Tests,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 82(3), pp. 175–184. [CrossRef]
Spindler, M. W., 2005, “The Prediction of Creep Damage in Type 347 Weld Metal—Part II: Creep Fatigue Tests,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 82(3), pp. 185–194. [CrossRef]
Spindler, M. W., and Spindler, S. L., 2008, “Creep Deformation, Rupture and Ductility of Esshete 1250,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85(1–2), pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Payten, W. M., Dean, D. W., and Snowden, K. U., 2010, “A Strain Energy Density Method for the Prediction of Creep-Fatigue Damage in High Temperature ComponentsMater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(7–8), pp. 1920–1925. [CrossRef]
PD6625-Part 1, 1990, Elevated Temperature Properties for Steels for Pressure Purposes, British Standards Institute, London, UK.
Spindler, S. L., Baker, A. J., 2007, Creep Deformation and Rupture of 1/2Cr 1/2Mo1/4V Parent Material E/REP/BBGB/0021/AGR/07 Rev 000 Draft 3, British Energy, Glouchester, UK.
Evans, R. W.,Parker, J. D., and Wilshire, B., 1992, “The [Theta] Projection Concept—A Model-Based Approach to Design and Life Extension of Engineering Plant,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 50(1–3), pp. 147–160. [CrossRef]
Hales, R., 1983, The Application of Creep-Damage Summation to the Assessment of Creep-Fatigue Endurance of Two Ferritic Steels, CEGB, TPRD/B/0288/N83, British Energy, Gloucester, UK.
Humphries, S. R., 2009, High Temperature Relaxation Properties of Ferritic Pressure Vessel Steel, in Faculty of Science, University of Technology, Sydney.
Humphries, S. R., Snowden, K. U., and Yeung, W., 2010, “The Effect of Repeated Loadings on the Stress Relaxation Properties of 2.25Cr–1Mo Steel at 550  °C and the Influence on the Feltham ‘a’ and ‘b’ Parameters,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(13–14), pp. 3240–3244. [CrossRef]
Humphries, S. R., Yeung, M. Y., and Callaghan, M. D., 2011, “The Effect of Stress Relaxation Loading Cycles on the Creep Behaviour of 2.25Cr–1Mo Pressure Vessel Steel,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528(3), pp. 1216–1220. [CrossRef]
Feltham, P. J., 1960, “Stress Relaxation in Copper and Alpha-Brasses at Low Temperatures,” J. Inst. Metals, 89, pp. 210–214.
Tanaka, C., 1975, “Long-Time Stress Relaxation Properties of 1Cr-0. 5Mo-0. 25V Steel,” Zairyo/Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan, 24(258), pp. 247–253. [CrossRef]
Tanaka, C., and Ohba, T., 1978, “Stress Relaxation Data of 1Cr-0. 5Mo-0. 25V, 12Cr-1Mo-1W-0. 25V, and 19Cr-9Ni-1. 4W-Nb Bolting Steels, 20(2), pp. 138–153.
Tanaka, C., and Ohba, T., 1985, “Analysis of Reloading Stress Relaxation Behavior With Specified Relaxed Stress Condition for High Temperature Bolting Steels,” Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 25(1), pp. 80–88. [CrossRef]
Taylor, N. G., Creep and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, B.Wilshire and R. W.Evans, eds., Institute of Metals, London, pp. 985–998.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Fitted creep rupture data for P22 at 550 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The ductility versus average creep rate for 2.25Cr-1Mo steels at 550 °C. εmin = 0.03 m/m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Change in initial dwell and relaxed stress as a function of cycle history

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Creep curves for 2.25Cr-1Mo steel at 550 °C and 100 MPa and 140 MPa with and without prior stress-relaxation testing at 550 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rupture stress versus rupture life for P22 at 550 °C with and without PSRC with the curves for the AJB2 medium and lower bound equations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Rupture ductility versus rupture life at 550 °C for P22 with and without PSRC plotted against the experimental rupture set

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Average predicted lives of all methods

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Rupture ductility versus rupture life at 550 °C for P22 with and without PSRC plotted against the experimental rupture set




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In