Technical Briefs

Critical Section Selection Methodology for the U.S. EPRTM Standard Nuclear Power Plant

[+] Author and Article Information
Se-Kwon Jung

e-mail: sekwon.jung@areva.com

Nawar Alchaar

7207 IBM Drive,
Charlotte, NC 28262

Specific elevation, thickness, and column line information is not presented and designated “X” for any critical section with this information.

This is identified as a critical section by both the qualitative and quantitative approaches.

These are shield structures for SB23 and FB.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology. Manuscript received May 24, 2011; final manuscript received February 11, 2013; published online June 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Tomoyo Taniguchi.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(4), 044501 (Jun 11, 2013) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-11-1131; doi: 10.1115/1.4023737 History: Received May 24, 2011; Revised February 11, 2013

A three-tier critical section selection methodology that is used to identify critical sections for the U.S. EPRTM standard nuclear power plant (NPP) is presented. The critical section selection methodology includes three complementary approaches: qualitative, quantitative, and supplementary. These three approaches are applied to Seismic Category I structures in a complementary fashion to identify the most critical portions of the building whose structural integrity needs to be maintained for postulated design basis events and conditions. Once the design of critical sections for a particular Seismic Category I structure is complete, the design for that structure is essentially complete for safety evaluation purposes. Critical sections, taken as a whole, are analytically representative of an “essentially complete” U.S. EPRTM design; their structural design adequacy provides reasonable assurance of overall U.S. EPRTM structural design adequacy.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Miscellaneous plan view of EPRTM nuclear island structures [6]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Miscellaneous elevation view of EPRTM nuclear island building arrangement [6]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

U.S. EPRTM standard nuclear power plant arrangement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic plan and elevation views for emergency power generating building (EPGB) and essential service water building (ESWB)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Shell-type element forces and moments in a local element coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

XY scatter plots for subsets of critical elements, expansion of N/10 XY scatter plot at key elevations and resulting critical section identification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic representation of a hypothetical building with applicable independent loads and general load combinations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Critical elements for load combinations and unique critical elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Projection of centroidal locations of N number of unique critical elements onto XY plane




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In