0
Research Papers: NDE

Effect of Temperature and Chloride Content on the Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of 304 Stainless Steel Welded Joints Treated by Ultrasonic Impact Treatment

[+] Author and Article Information
Gang Ma

Taizhou Supervision and
Inspection Center of Special Equipment,
93 Wei Er Road, Taizhou,
Zhejiang 318000, China;
School of Mechanical and Power Engineering,
Nanjing University of Technology,
5 Xin Mo Fan Road, Nanjing,
Jiangsu 210009, China
e-mail: gmnjut@163.com

Xiang Ling

School of Mechanical and Power Engineering,
Nanjing University of Technology,
5 Xin Mo Fan Road, Nanjing,
Jiangsu 210009, China
e-mail: xling@njut.edu.cn

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 18, 2011; final manuscript received December 6, 2011; published online August 26, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Prof. Tribikram Kundu.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(5), 051501 (Aug 26, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: PVT-11-1014; doi: 10.1115/1.4005871 History: Received January 18, 2011; Revised December 06, 2011

Effect of temperature and chloride content on the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) susceptibility of 304 stainless steel welded joints treated by ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT) is investigated in this study. High tensile weld residual stress is an important factor contributing to SCC. UIT can produce compressive stresses on the surface of welded joints that negate the tensile stresses to enhance the SCC resistance of welded joints. In the SCC testing, the specimens were immersed in sodium chloride solution at the temperatures of 200 °C–280 °C in the range of sodium chloride solution from 50 g/L to 200 g/L. During the testing, treated specimens show good SCC resistance with different temperature and consistency of chloride ion. The results show that the SCC susceptibility of 304 stainless steel welded joints reduces with increase of temperature and decrease of chloride ion consistency. The surface roughness of sample after UIT was investigated by portable surface roughness tester. The results reveal that surface of the samples becomes rougher than the original plate with the increase of the impact duration, which contribute to the pitting corrosion of treated specimens. And, the level of pitting corrosion is reduced with increase of temperature.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lu, S. Y., and Zhang, K. D., 1977, Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel, Science Press, Beijing, P. R.China, Chap. I
Qiao, L. J., and Wang, Y. B., 1993, Mechanism of Stress Corrosion Cracking, Science Press, Beijing, P. R.China, Chap. I.
DeWald, A. T., Rankin, J. E., Hill, M. R., Lee, M. J., and Chen, H. L., 2004, “Assessment of Tensile Residual Stress Mitigation in Alloy 22 Welds Due to Laser Peening,” ASME.J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 126, pp. 465–473. [CrossRef]
Ni, H. F., 2004, “A Study on Effect of Shot Peening on Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Welded Joints,” Master’s thesis, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, P. R. China.
Xiang, L., and Gang, M., 2009, “Effect of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on the Stress Corrosion Cracking of 304 Stainless Steel Welded Joints,” ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 131(5), p. 051502. [CrossRef]
Statnikov, E. S., Zhuravlev, L. V., Alekseev, A. F., Bobylev, Y. A., ShevtsovE. M., Sokolenko, V. I., and Kulikov, V. F., 1975, “Ultrasonic Head for Strain Hardening and Relaxation Treatment (in Russian),” USSR Inventor’s Certificate No. 472782, Published in Byull. Izobret. No. 21, Priority of 1972.
Togasaki, Y., Honda, T., Sasaki, T., Yamaguchi, A., and Tsuji, H., 2010, “Effect of Ultrasonic Impact Treatment on Fatigue Life in Butt Welded Joints of Austenitic Stainless Steel,” ASME Conference Proceedings PVP2010, 6, pp. 503–508.
Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, P., and Zhang, H., 2004, “The Investigation of Internal Friction and Elastic Modulus in Surface Nanostructured Materials,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 370, pp. 158–162. [CrossRef]
Statnikov, E. S., 2000, “Applications of Operational Ultrasonic Impact Treatment (UIT) Technologies in Production of Welded Joints,” Weld. World, 44(3), pp.11–21.
Cheng, X., Fisher, J. W., Prask, H. J., Gn¨aupel-Herold, T., Yen, B. T., and Roy, S., 2003, “Residual Stress Modification by Post-Weld Treatment and its Beneficial Effect on Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures,” Int. J. Fatigue, 25(9–11), pp. 1259–1269. [CrossRef]
Liu, G., Lu, J., and Lu, K., 2000, “Surface Nanocrystallization of 316L Stainless Steel Induce by Ultrasonic Shot Peening,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 286(1), pp. 91–95. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of multipass welding/mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of UIT process/mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Measuring-point location of the specimen/mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Factors contrast curve of SCC susceptibility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

structure of sample 5-1 after SCC test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pitting corrosion of treated specimens: (a) sample 3-2; (b) sample 3-3; (c) sample 4-2; (d) sample 4-3; (e) sample 5-2; and (f) sample 5-3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Surface residual stress of treated plate before and after the SCC test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Photograph of the treated surface: (a) sample treated for 60 s; (b) sample treated for120 s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In