0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Weld Strength Mismatch in Strain Based Flaw Assessment: Which Definition to Use?

[+] Author and Article Information
Stijn Hertelé

e-mail: Stijn.Hertele@UGent.be

Wim De Waele

e-mail: Wim.DeWaele@UGent.be

Rudi Denys

e-mail: Rudi.Denys@UGent.be

Matthias Verstraete

e-mail: Matthias.Verstraete@UGent.be

Koen Van Minnebruggen

e-mail: Koen.VanMinnebruggen@UGent.be
Soete Laboratory,
Ghent University,
Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 903,
Zwijnaarde 9052, Belgium

Anthony Horn

Swinden Technology Centre,
Tata Steel RD&T,
Moorgate, Rotherham,
South Yorkshire S60 3AR, UK
e-mail: Anthony.Horn@amec.com

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 1, 2012; final manuscript received August 22, 2013; published online October 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Hardayal S. Mehta.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(6), 061402 (Oct 10, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1112; doi: 10.1115/1.4025343 History: Received August 01, 2012; Revised August 22, 2013

Weld strength mismatch is a key factor in the strain based assessment of flawed girth welds under tension. A strength overmatching weld shields potential flaws within the weld itself from remotely applied deformations and consequently reduces crack driving force. Although this effect has been recognized for decades, different weld strength overmatch definitions exist, and it is not yet fully established which of those is most relevant to a strain based flaw assessment. In an effort to clarify this unsolved question, the authors have performed a large series of parametric finite element analyses of curved wide plate tests. This paper provides an experimental validation of the model and subsequently discusses representative results. It is found that crack driving force is influenced by the shape of the pipe metals' stress–strain curves, which influences the representativeness of two common mismatch definitions (based on yield strength and on ultimate tensile strength). Effects of strength mismatch on strain capacity of a flawed girth weld are best described on the basis of a flow stress, defined as the average of yield and ultimate tensile strength. Based on the observations, a framework for a new strain capacity equation is proposed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Østby, E., 2005, “Fracture Control—Offshore Pipelines—New Strain-Based Fracture Mechanics Equations Including the Effects of Biaxial Loading, Mismatch and Misalignment,” Proceedings of the 24th ASME International Conference Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Halkidiki, Greece, Paper No. OMAE2005-67518.
Kibey, S., Wang, X., Minnaar, K., Macia, M. L., Fairchild, D. P., Kan, W. C., Ford, S. J., and Newbury, B., 2010, “Tensile Strain Capacity Equations for Strain-Based Design of Welded pipelines,” Proceedings of the 8th ASME International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. IPC2010-31661.
Denys, R., Hertelé, S., Verstraete, M., and De Waele, W., 2011, “Strain Capacity Prediction for Strain-Based Pipeline Designs,” Proceedings of the Internal Workshop on Welding of High Strength Pipeline Steels, Araxá, Brazil.
Kim, Y. J., and Schwalbe, K. H., 2001, “Mismatch Effect on Plastic Yield Loads in Idealised Weldments I. Weld Centre Cracks,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68(2), pp. 163–182. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y. J., and Schwalbe, K. H., 2001, “Mismatch Effect on Plastic Yield Loads in Idealised Weldments II. Heat Affected Zone Cracks,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 68(2), pp. 183–199. [CrossRef]
Motohashi, H., and Hagiwara, N., 2007, “Analytical Study of Effects of Strength Matching on Strain Capacity,” Proceedings of the 17th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 3101–3106.
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., Denys, R., and Verstraete, M., 2011, “Sensitivity of Plastic Response of Defective Pipeline Girth Welds to the Stress-Strain Behavior of Base and Weld Metal,” ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 135(1), p. 011402. [CrossRef]
Fairchild, D. P., Crawford, M. D., Cheng, W., Macia, M. L., Nissley, N. E., Ford, S. J., Lillig, D. B., and Sleigh, J., 2008, “Girth Welds for Strain-Based Design Pipelines,” Proceedings of the 18th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 48–56.
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., Denys, R., Verstraete, M., and Van Wittenberghe, J., 2012, “Parametric Finite Element Model for Large Scale Tension Tests on Flawed Pipeline Girth Welds,” Adv. Eng. Software, 47(1), pp. 24–34. [CrossRef]
Ling, Y., 1996, “Uniaxial True Stress-Strain After Necking,” AMP J. Technol., 5, pp. 37–48.
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., Denys, R., and Verstraete, M., 2012, “Full-Range Stress-Strain Behaviour of Contemporary Pipeline Steels: Part I. Model Description,” Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping, 92, pp. 34–40. [CrossRef]
“CSA Z662, Oil & Gas Pipeline Systems,” 2007, Canadian Standards Association, Canada.
“API 1104, Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities,” 2007, American Petroleum Institute, Washington.
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., and Denys, R., “A Generic Stress-Strain Model for Metallic Materials With Two-Stage Strain Hardening Behaviour,” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 46(3), pp. 519–531. [CrossRef]
Rice, J. R., 1968, “A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,” J. Appl. Mech., 35, pp. 379–386. [CrossRef]
Fairchild, D. P., Cheng, W., Ford, S. J., Minnaar, K., Biery, N. E., Kumar, A., and Nissley, N. E., 2008, “Recent Advances in Curved Wide Plate Testing and Implications for Strain-Based Design,” Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng., 18(3), pp. 161–170.
Denys, R., and Lefevre, A., 2009, “Ugent Guidelines for Curved Wide Plate Testing,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pipeline Technology, Ostend, Belgium.
Yoosef-Ghodsi, N., Duan, D. M., Chen, Q., Petersen, R., and Fan, C., 2010, “Finite Element Analysis of Flaw Growth History,” Proceedings of the 8th ASME International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. IPC2010-31418.
Østby, E., Thaulow, C., and Nyhus, B., 2007, “A new Approach to Ductile Tearing Assessment of Pipelines Under Large-Scale Yielding,” Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping, 84(6), pp. 337–348. [CrossRef]
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., Denys, R., and Verstraete, M., 2012, “Justification of the Mapping Approach for Finite Element Modelling of Ductile Tearing,” Sustainable Constr. Des., 3, pp. 36–43.
Hertelé, S., 2012, “Development of a Coupled Experimental-Numerical Framework for the Assessment of Strain Capacity of Flawed Girth Welds in Pipelines,” Ph.D. thesis, Soete Laboratory, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
“API 5L. Specification for Line Pipe,” 2007, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
Lei, Y., 2005, “J-integral Evaluation for Cases Involving Non-Proportional Stressing,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 72(4), pp. 577–596. [CrossRef]
“DNV-RP-F108, 2006, Fracture Control for Pipeline Installation Methods Introducing Cyclic Plastic Strain,” Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway.
Tkaczyk, T., 2010, “Development of Fracture Mechanics Based Criteria for Failure of Reeled Pipes,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of London—Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.
Hertelé, S., De Waele, W., Denys, R., and Verstraete, M., 2012, “Investigation of Strain Measurements in (Curved) Wide Plate Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation and Finite Element Analysis,” J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des., 47(5), pp. 276–288. [CrossRef]
Fairchild, D. P., Macia, M. L., Kibey, S., Wang, X., Krishnan, V. R., Bardi, F., Tang, H., and Cheng, W., 2011, “A Multi-Tiered Procedure for Engineering Critical Assessment of Strain-Based Pipelines,” Proceedings of the 21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 698–705.
Denys, R., Hertelé, S., and Verstraete, M., 2010, “Strain Capacity of Weak and Strong Girth Welds in Axially Loaded Pipelines,” Proceedings of the International Pipeline Technical Conference, Beijing, China, pp. 116–124.
Verstraete, M., De Waele, W., Denys, R., and Hertelé, S., 2012, “Pressure Correction Factor for Strain Capacity Predictions Based on Curved Wide Plate Testing,” Proceedings of the 9th ASME International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. IPC2012-90592.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

CWP specimen (Soete Laboratory)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometrical characterization of a CWP panel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Half CWP model with representative mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Narrow gap GMAW girth weld

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental and simulated CMOD response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Post mortem investigation of the notch reveals that no ductile tearing occurred

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

LVDT positions for strain measurements advised in the UGent guidelines for CWP testing [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Illustration of the ductile tearing approach: (a) Mapping. (b) Evolution of flaw depth. (c) Tangency indicates failure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Influences of different weld strength overmatch definitions ((a) OMYS, (b) OMTS, (c) OMFS) on relative strain capacity emax/em (Ramberg-Osgood is abbreviated as RO)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Influences of different weld strength overmatch definitions ((a) OMYS, (b) OMTS, (c) OMFS) on strain capacity emax (Ramberg-Osgood is abbreviated as RO). Note the clear trends in subfigure (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The relation between OMFS and emax is influenced by weld geometry and flaw location

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Graphical representation of the proposed framework for strain capacity estimation

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In