Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Sensitivity Analysis of Fitness-for-Service Assessment Based on Reliability for Cylindrical Pressure Vessels With Local Metal Loss

[+] Author and Article Information
Takuyo Kaida

Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.,
5-l, Sobiraki-cho,
Niihama City,
Ehime 792-8521, Japan
e-mail: kaidat@sc.sumitomo-chem.co.jp

Satoshi Izumi

e-mail: izumi@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Shinsuke Sakai

e-mail: sakai@fml.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
The University of Tokyo,
7-3-1, Hongo,
Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 7, 2013; final manuscript received March 19, 2013; published online September 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(6), 061202 (Sep 18, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-13-1008; doi: 10.1115/1.4024455 History: Received January 07, 2013; Revised March 19, 2013

Concern about fitness-for-service (FFS) assessments using stochastic analyses for aged pressure equipment with local metal loss has been growing. When a decision must be made regarding whether to run or repair equipment with local metal loss, a structural integrity assessment based on reliability helps. In analyses of failure probability, it is important to identify which variables strongly affect the structural integrity. The stochastic properties of influential parameters must be clarified, but few data have been published regarding the quantitative analysis of the sensitivity of the parameters in FFS assessments of components with local metal loss. Here, we investigated the effects of parameters on the plastic collapse of a damaged cylindrical pressure vessel with local metal loss, in an evaluation of parameter sensitivity. We also analyzed sensitivity indices for the component with several shapes of local metal loss. We found that the corrosion rate has a major influence on the probability of failure. We propose a practical stochastic analysis procedure for components with local metal loss. In this procedure, the parameter that has consistently low sensitivity to the limit state is used as a constant value.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow chart for development of practical limit state model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sensitivity indices in standard normal space

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Longitudinal section at the region of metal loss

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Assessment curve of probability of failure in case that CV and tmm are treated as random variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Calculation results of sensitivity indices: Pf = 1 × 10−6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calculation results of sensitivity indices: Pf = 1 × 10−5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Calculation results of sensitivity indices: Pf = 1 × 10−4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Probability of failure assessment curve in case in which all variables are treated as random variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Probability of failure assessment curve utilizing the modified limit state model, Xm = 1.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Cumulative density function of Type I and Weibull distribution for CV

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Exceedance probabilities of Type I and Weibull distributions for CV




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In