0
Technical Briefs

The Adhesion Failure Mode in Stainless Steel Trim Spring-Operated Pressure Relief Valves

[+] Author and Article Information
Julia V. Bukowski

Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering,
Villanova University,
Villanova, PA 19085
e-mail: julia.bukowski@villanova.edu

Robert E. Gross

Savannah River Nuclear Solutions,
US-DOE Savannah River Site,
ms 704-2H,
Aiken, SC 29808
e-mail: robert.gross@srs.gov

William M. Goble

exida, LLC,
64 North Main Street,
Sellersville, PA 18960
e-mail: wgoble@exida.com

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 8, 2012; final manuscript received June 18, 2013; published online October 10, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Allen C. Smith.

The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States government purposes.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 135(6), 064502 (Oct 10, 2013) (6 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1123; doi: 10.1115/1.4025086 History: Received August 08, 2012; Revised June 18, 2013

This paper addresses dangerous failures of stainless steel (SS) trim spring-operated pressure relief valves (SOPRV) due to a particular failure mode (SS-to-SS adhesion), which is not currently being included in SOPRV failure rates. As a result, current methods for estimating or predicting failure rates for SS trim SOPRV significantly underestimate these failure rates and, consequently, overestimate the safety provided by the SOPRV as measured by its average probability of failure on demand (PFDavg) or its corresponding safety integrity level (SIL). The paper also illustrates the critical importance of root cause analysis (RCA) of dangerous SOPRV failures in understanding the impacts of various failure modes. Over 1300 proof test results for both new and used SS trim SOPRV from the Savannah River Site (SRS) were identified. RCA was used on the failed valves to classify those failed due to SS-to-SS adhesions. Statistical analysis of the data convincingly demonstrates adhesions, previously assumed to be only an in-storage failure phenomenon, are also an in-service failure mode, which needs to be included in SOPRV failure rates. The paper discusses the factors which potentially influence the adhesion failure mode, and suggests a possible approach to including this mode in failure rate predictions. An example illustrates how current failure rate models overestimate SS trim SOPRV safety by 1 or 2 orders of magnitude.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Failure , Pressure
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Plot of R versus set pressure (psi (gauge)) for new SOPRV

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Plot of R versus set pressure (psi (gauge)) for used SOPRV

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Plot of R versus time between successive proof tests (years) for used SOPRV

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In