0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Lower Bound Methods in Elastic-Plastic Shakedown Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Wolf Reinhardt

Candu Energy Inc.,
2285 Speakman Drive,
Mississauga, ON L5K 1B1, Canada
e-mail: wolf.reinhardt@candu.com

Reza Adibi-Asl

AMEC NSS Ltd.,
393 University Avenue,
Toronto, ON M5G 1E6, Canada
e-mail: reza.adibiasl@amec.com

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 27, 2012; final manuscript received August 29, 2013; published online January 7, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Haofeng Chen.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(2), 021201 (Jan 07, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1158; doi: 10.1115/1.4025941 History: Received September 27, 2012; Revised August 29, 2013

Several methods were proposed in recent years that allow the efficient calculation of elastic and elastic-plastic shakedown limits. This paper establishes a uniform framework for such methods that are based on perfectly-plastic material behavior, and demonstrates the connection to Melan's theorem of elastic shakedown. The paper discusses implications for simplified methods of establishing shakedown, such as those used in the ASME Code. The framework allows a clearer assessment of the limitations of such simplified approaches. Application examples are given.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Stress
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic interaction diagram with ratchet boundary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Bree example—extreme cyclic bending strain distributions through the thickness of a beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Bree example—optimum membrane stress redistributions at ratchet boundary

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Bree example—interaction diagram for primary and secondary cyclic loading with time-invariant primary membrane load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Three bar example—schematic configuration and bar heating sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Ratchet boundary for pressurized two bar model, FEA results extracted from Ref. [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Pressurized two-bar model

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In