0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Development, Use, and Accuracy of a Homogenized Fuel Region Model for Thermal Analysis of a Truck Package Under Normal and Fire Accident Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Krishna Kumar Kamichetty, Venkata Venigalla

Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Nevada,
Reno,
Reno, NV 89557

Miles Greiner

Fellow ASME
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Nevada,
Reno,
Reno, NV 89557
e-mail: greiner@unr.edu

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 25, 2012; final manuscript received November 14, 2013; published online February 12, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jong Chull Jo.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(2), 021208 (Feb 12, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1156; doi: 10.1115/1.4026065 History: Received September 25, 2012; Revised November 14, 2013

In the current work, a geometrically-accurate two-dimensional model is developed of an isolated fuel assembly within isothermal compartment walls. Finite difference thermal simulations are performed to determine the cladding temperature for a range of compartment wall temperatures and assembly heat generation rates. The results for zero-heat-generation-rate are used to determine a temperature-dependent effective thermal conductivity of the fuel region. The effective volumetric specific heat of the region is determined from a lumped capacity model. These effective properties are then applied to a two-dimensional model of a legal weight truck cask with homogenized (smeared) fuel regions. Steady-state normal conditions of transport simulations are performed for a range of fuel heat generation rates. The generation rate that brings the zircaloy cladding to its radial-hydride formation temperature, predicted by the homogenized model, is greater than that determined by simulations that employ an accurate-geometry fuel region model. Transient regulator fire accident simulations are then performed for a range of fire durations. The critical fire duration is defined as the minimum that brings the fuel cladding to its burst-rupture temperature. That duration is found to decrease as the fuel heat generation rate increases. The critical durations predicted by the homogenized fuel-region model are shorter than those predicted by the accurate-geometry model.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

U.S Department of Energy, 1987, “Characteristics of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Waste, and Other Radioactive Wastes Which May Require Long-Term Isolation,” Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, DOE/RW-0184.
Saling, J. H., and Fentiman, A. W., 2001, Radioactive Waste Management, Taylor and Francis, New York.
General Atomics (GA), 1998, “GA-4 Legal Weight Truck From-Reactor Spent Fuel Shipping Cask, Safety Analysis Report for Packaging (SARP),” Prepared by General Atomics, San Diego, CA.
Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, 1987, “Characteristics of Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and Other Radioactive Waste Which May Require Long-Term Isolation,” Vol. 3, DOE/RW-0184.
10CFR 71, 2011, “Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material,” Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Jan. 1, Washington, D.C.
U.S. NRC, 2003, “Cladding Considerations for the Transportation and Storage of Spent Fuel,” ISG-11 R3, Interim Staff Guidance Report for the Spent Fuel Project Office.
Sprung, J. L., Ammerman, D. J., Breivik, N. L., Dukart, R. J., Kanipe, F. L., Koski, J. A., Mills, G. S., Neuhauser, K. S., Radloff, H. D., Weiner, R. F., and Yoshimura, H. R., 2003, “Reexamination of Spent Fuel Shipment Risk Estimates,” Vol. 1, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Paper No. NUREG/CR-6672.
Unterzuber, R., Milnes, R. D., Marinkovich, B. A., and Kubancsek, G. M., 1982, “Spent-Fuel Dry Storage Testing at EMAD (March 1978–1982),” Prepared for the US DOE Commercial Spent Fuel Management Program Office at the Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Paper No. B-D3339-A-G.
Manteufel, R. D., and Todreas, N. E., 1994, “Effective Thermal Conductivity and Edge Conductance Model for a Spent Fuel Assembly,” Nucl. Technol., 105, pp. 421–440.
Bahney, R. H., and Lotz, T. L., 1996, “Spent Nuclear Fuel Effective Thermal Conductivity Report,” Prepared for the U.S. DOE, Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Project Office by TRW Environmental Safety Systems, Inc., July 11, D.I.: BBA000000-01717-5705-00010 REV 00.
Greiner, M., Gangadharan, K. K., and Gudipati, M., 2007, “Use of Fuel Assembly/Backfill Gas Effective Thermal Conductivity Models to Predict Basket and Fuel Cladding Temperatures Within a Rail Package During Normal Transport,” Nucl. Technol., 160, pp. 325–336.
Gudipati, M., and Greiner, M., 2008, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Fuel Cladding and Basket Surface Temperatures in Multipurpose Canister Rail Cask During Normal Transport,” Packag., Transp., Storage Secur. Radioact. Mater., 19(3), pp. 173–179. [CrossRef]
Venigalla, V. V. R., and Greiner, M., 2009, “Use of Geometrically-Accurate Fuel Models to Predict Cladding and Basket Temperatures Within a Truck Cask During Normal Transport,” Nucl. Technol., 167, pp. 313–324.
Lovett, P. M., 1991, “An Experiment to Simulate the Heat Transfer Properties of a Dry, Horizontal Spent Nuclear Fuel Assembly,” M.S. thesis, Nuclear Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Canaan, R. E., and Klein, D. E., 1996, “An Experimental Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer within Horizontal Spent Fuel Assemblies,” Nucl. Technol., 116, pp. 306–318.
Canaan, R. E., and Klein, D. E., 1998, “A Numerical Investigation of Natural Convection Heat Transfer within Horizontal Spent-Fuel Assemblies,” Nucl. Technol., 123, pp. 193–208.
Arya, M. S., and Keyhani, M., 1990, “Convective Heat Transfer in a Sealed Storage Cask Containing Spent Fuel Canisters,” J. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 105, pp. 248–259.
Chalasani, N. R., Araya, P., and Greiner, M., 2009, “Benchmark of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations Using Temperatures Measured Within Enclosed Vertical and Horizontal Arrays of Heated Rods,” Nucl. Technol., 167(3), pp. 371–383.
Chalasani, N. R., and Greiner, M., 2006, “Natural Convection/Radiation Heat Transfer Simulations of an Enclosed Array of Vertical Rods,” Proceedings of PVP2006-ICPVT-11, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, July 23–27, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93734.
Kamichetty, K. K., Greiner, M., and Venigalla, V. V. R., 2010, “Use of Geometrically-Accurate Models to Predict Spent Nuclear Fuel Cladding Temperatures Within a Truck Cask Under Normal and Fire Accident Conditions,” Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference, PVP2010, July 18–22, Bellevue, WA, Paper No. PVP2010-25991.
Adkins, H. E., Cuta, J. M., Koeppel, B. J.Jr., Guzman, A. D., and Bajwa, C. S., 2006, “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Baltimore Tunnel Fire Scenario,” Rev. 2, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington D.C., Paper No. NUREG/CR-6886.
Adkins, H. E., Koeppel, B. J., Jr., Cuta, J. M., Guzman, A. D., and Bajwa, C. S., 2006, “Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Caldecott Tunnel Fire Scenario,” Rev.1, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington D.C., Paper No. NUREG/CR-6894.
NRC Docket Number 72-1008, 2001, “Final Safety Analysis Report for Holtec International Storage Transport and Repository Cask System (HI-STAR 100 Cask System),” HI-210610, Vols. I and II, HOLTEC, Marlton, NJ.
Kakac, S., and Yener, Y., 1993, Heat Conduction, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA.
Wheeler, A. J., and Ganji, A. R., 2010, Introduction to Engineering Experimentation, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p. 171.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 1996, Introduction to Heat Transfer, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Isolated fuel region computational mesh for a 15 × 15 PWR. (a) Structure used to construct full mesh. Detail of (b) course Mesh with 21,600 nodes, (c) nominal Mesh with 86,400 nodes, and (d) fine Mesh with 316,800 nodes.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Temperature-dependent thermal conductivities. Solid lines show conductivity of each material. Dashed lines show effective conductivities of homogenized fuel region.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temperature contours within the upper right-hand quarter of the isolated fuel region model for N2 with TB = 25 °C and Q ′ = 166 W/m (a) AG simulation (b) HG simulation with a uniform effective conductivity kU.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Temperature along w-axis shown in Fig. 3 minus boundary temperature versus distance from the fuel region center for N2 gas, TB = 25 °C and Q ′ = 166 W/m. Results are shown for an AG simulation, and for HG simulations using uniform conductivity kU, and temperature-dependent conductivity kT.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Ratio of center-to-boundary temperature difference within AG domains for different numbers of mesh points NG, to that for NG = 316,800. Results are given for Q ′ = 166 W/m, He and N2 gases, and TB = 25 and 1000 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Center-to-boundary temperature difference versus axial heat generation rate for different boundary temperatures for an isolated fuel region. Diamonds show AG simulation results while lines show HG simulation results (a) N2 gas and (b) He gas

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Uniform effective thermal conductivity versus axial heat generation rate for different boundary temperatures (a) N2 gas and (b) He gas

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Full package cross-section AG model, with NG = 86,400.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NCT Temperature contours for Q ′ = 750 W/m-assembly and N2 gas from the upper half of the full package simulations (a) AG, (b) HG with temperature-dependent fuel region effective thermal conductivity kT.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

NCT basket surface temperature profiles along s-coordinate (Fig. 8) for Q ′ = 750 W/m for He and N2 from AG (solid lines) and HG (dashed lines) simulations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Peak clad temperature versus axial heat generation rate from AG (solid lines) and HG (dashed lines) package simulations for He and N2 cover gases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Peak cladding temperatures versus time during and after a D = 30 min fire, from HG (dashed lines) and AG (solid lines) simulations, with He and N2 cover gases. Dots show the maximum peak clad temperatures.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Fire duration of concern for cladding versus axial heat generation rate for He and N2 cover gases from HG (dashed lines) and AG (solid lines) simulations

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In