0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Ultrasonic Measurement of Thick-Walled Pipe Diameter Changes

[+] Author and Article Information
Jacek Szelążek

Department of Strength of Materials,
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research,
Warsaw 02-106, Poland
e-mail: jszela@ippt.pan.pl

Piotr Gutkiewicz

Department of Strength of Materials,
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research,
Warsaw 02-106, Poland
e-mail: pgutkie@ippt.pan.pl

Paweł Grzywna

Department of Strength of Materials,
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research,
Warsaw 02-106, Poland
e-mail: pgrzywna@ippt.pan.pl

Sławomir Mackiewicz

Department of Strength of Materials,
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research
Warsaw 02-106, Poland
e-mail: smackie@ippt.pan.pl

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 5, 2012; final manuscript received November 25, 2013; published online April 28, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jianmin Qu.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(4), 041408 (Apr 28, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1025; doi: 10.1115/1.4026114 History: Received March 05, 2012; Revised November 25, 2013

Thick-walled, main stream pipelines are key elements in many power and chemical plants. Operating for a long time in high temperature and subjected to internal pressure such pipes are subjected to creep resulting in material degradation and strain. The most common method of pipe state evaluation is pipe diameter monitoring. Usually such measurements are performed with micrometer gauge in locations where special “pips” were earlier installed. Other methods are also tested to monitor creep progress like various temperature-resistance strain gauges or eddy current sensors. The paper examines a new ultrasonic technique to evaluate thick-walled pipe diameter changes. Pipe diameter evaluation is based on time of flight of bulk ultrasonic waves propagating in circumferential direction along the polygon, reflecting on the pipe external surface only. Presented are results of experiments performed on 100 mm diameter pipe subjected to internal pressure to generate small diameter changes and on 273 mm diameter and 40 mm wall thickness pipe section. Measurements were performed with longitudinal, shear SV and shear SH waves. Described are advantages and disadvantages of various ultrasonic wave types for pipe diameter evaluation in practice. Discussed is the influence of residual stresses and temperature on accuracy of pipe diameter evaluation with proposed technique. Shear SV wave was chosen as the most easily applicable ultrasonic wave on thick-walled tubes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Waves , Pipes
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Brithel, L., 1978, “Macroscopic Measurements of Creep Damage in Metals,” Stand. J. Metal., 7(5), pp. 199–203.
Ohtani, T., Ogi, H., and Hirao, M., 2006, “Evolution of Microstructure and Acoustic Damping During Creep of a Cr–Mo–V Ferritic Steel,” Acta Mater., 54(10), pp. 2705–2713. [CrossRef]
Kim, C. S., Park, I. K., and Jhang, K. Y., 2009, “Nonlinear Ultrasonic Characterization of Thermal Degradation in Ferritic 2.25Cr–1Mo Steel,” NDT & E Int., 42(3), pp. 204–209. [CrossRef]
Szelazek, J., Mackiewicz, S., and Kowalewski, Z. L., 2009, “New Samples With Artificial Voids for Ultrasonic Investigation of Material Damage Due to Creep,” NDT & E Int., 42(2), pp. 150–156. [CrossRef]
Govindaraju, W. R., Kaminski, D. A., Devine, M. K., Biner, S. B., and Jiles, D. C., 1997, “Nondestructive Evaluation of Creep Damage in Power-Plant Steam Generators and Piping by Magnetic Measurements,” NDT & E Int., 30(1), pp. 11–17. [CrossRef]
Augustyniak, B., Chmielewski, M., Piotrowski, L., and Kowalewski, Z. L., 2008, “Comparison of Properties of Magnetoacoustic Emission and Mechanical Barkhausen Effects for P91 Steel After Plastic Flow and Creep,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 44(11), pp. 3273–3276. [CrossRef]
Herbert, W., and Dobmann, G., 1991, “Early Detection of Creep Damage by Ultrasonic and Electromagnetic Techniques,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 128(1), pp. 139–149. [CrossRef]
Sposito, G., Ward, C., Cawley, P., Nagy, P. B., and Scruby, C., 2010, “A Review of Non-Destructive Techniques for the Detection of Creep Damage in Power Plant Steels,” NDT & E Int., 43(7), pp. 555–567. [CrossRef]
Joas, H. D., 1999, “Restlebensdauer von zeitstandbelasteten Bauteilen—experimentell nach der TUEV-Creep-Replica-Methode geprueft,“VDI Berichte Nr.1463, pp. 269–275.
Zarrabi, K., and Oreb, B. F., 1997, “Current Experimental Techniques for High Temperature Displacement/Strain Evaluation: An Outline of Available Techniques,” Proc. SPIE, 2921, pp. 228–237.
Zhu, L., He, H., and Ding, Q., 2008, “Research on and Development of Steam Pipeline Creep Real-time Monitoring System Based on Virtual Instrument Technology,” Proceedings of 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, 25–28 Oct., Shanghai, China.
Shivaraj, K., Balasubramaniam, K., and Kirshnamurthy, C. V., 2008, “Ultrasonic Circumferential Guided Wave for Pitting-Type Corrosion Imaging at Inaccessible Pipe-Support Locations,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 130(2), pp. 451–464. [CrossRef]
Latimer, P. J., and Whaley, H. L., 1991, “Method of Detecting Creep Swelling,” U.S. Patent No. 5035143.
Ammirato, F. V., 1977, “A Calculational Model for the Shear Wave Echo From Subsurface Planar Flaws,” Mater. Eval., 35(1), pp. 46–53.
Dobmann, G., Kroening, M., Theiner, W., Willems, H., and Fiedler, U., 1992, “Nondestructive Characterization of Materials (Ultrasonic and Micromagnetic Techniques for Strength and Toughness Prediction and the Detection of Early Creep Damage,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 157(1–2), pp. 137–158. [CrossRef]
Brokowski, A., and Szelazek, J., 1996, “Set of Ultrasonic Probeheads for the Measurement of Time of Flight of Ultrasonic Pulses,” U.S. Patent No. 5,549,001.
Timoshenko, S., and Goodier, J. N., 1951, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Deputat, J., 1987, “Application of Elastoacoustic Effect for Residua Stress Evaluation,” IFTR Reports, 28/1987, Warsaw (in Polish).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schema of bulk wave propagation in a thick-wall pipe, along the polygon in the circumferential direction: (a)—triple-reflected wave, (b)—4-times reflected wave, (c)—5-times reflected, etc. Until the subsurface wave.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schema of the probehead coupled to the pipe external surface and the path of ultrasonic pulse from transmitting to receiving transducer

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two-transducer probes for shear SV (left) and SH (right) waves on the 273 mm diameter pipe sample. Dotted lines mark the transducers positions. Arrows—paths of ultrasonic pulses in the wedges and pipe wall.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Shear SH wave TOF dependence on internal pressure for 190 mm diameter steel pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Oscilloscope screen for SH wave propagating in the 273 mm pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Oscilloscope screen for SV wave propagating in the 273 mm pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Second round trip pulses of SV wave in the 273 mm pipe (magnification)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relative temperature-dependent changes for longitudinal wave in the probehead wedge and SV shear wave in the 273 mm pipe material

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In