Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Development of Boiling Water Reactor Steam Dryer Loading Evaluation Methods Through Scale Model Tests Under Actual Steam Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Shiro Takahashi

Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.,
1-1 Omika, 7-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 319-1292, Japan
e-mail: shiro.takahashi.fu@hitachi.com

Keita Okuyama

Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.,
1-1 Omika, 7-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 319-1292, Japan
e-mail: keita.okuyama.uu@hitachi.com

Akinori Tamura

Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd.,
1-1 Omika, 7-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 319-1292, Japan
e-mail: akinori.tamura.mt@hitachi.com

Yasuhiro Mabuchi

Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd.,
1-1 Saiwai, 3-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-8511, Japan
e-mail: yasuhiro.mabuchi.ep@hitachi.com

Teppei Kubota

Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd.,
1-1 Saiwai, 3-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-8511, Japan
e-mail: teppei.kubota.cj@hitachi.com

Kazuhiro Yoshikawa

Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy, Ltd.,
1-1 Saiwai, 3-chome,
Hitachi, Ibaraki 317-8511, Japan
e-mail: kazuhiro.yoshikawa.cv@hitachi.com

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 2, 2013; final manuscript received January 8, 2014; published online August 19, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jong Chull Jo.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(5), 051307 (Aug 19, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-13-1151; doi: 10.1115/1.4026580 History: Received September 02, 2013; Revised January 08, 2014

Previous plant measurements and scale model tests have demonstrated that intense fluctuating pressure acted on the steam dryer in boiling water reactors (BWRs) at higher velocity flows than in normal operation. The cause of the dryer loading was considered as flow-induced acoustic resonance at the stub pipes of safety relief valves (SRVs) in the main steam lines (MSLs). Acoustic resonance was considered to be generated by the interaction between the sound field and the unstable shear layer across the opening of the side branches of the SRV stub pipes. Some air scale tests have been conducted and they are useful for evaluation of occurrence of acoustic resonance in SRV stub pipes and characteristics of fluctuating pressure in MSLs. However, it is possible that differences in pressure conditions and fluid properties may cause the dryer loading to be underestimated. In the present study, we conducted scale tests under actual steam conditions to evaluate the scale model test methods for BWR dryer loading estimation. The test apparatus consisted of a steam dryer, steam dome and 4 MSLs with 20 SRV stub pipes. We demonstrated that acoustic resonance occurred in the SRV stub pipes and the fluctuating pressure which propagated from the SRVs to the dryer caused fluctuating stress on the steam dryer at the SRV resonance frequency. Acoustic resonance started when Strouhal number decreased below 0.6 in both the scale model air and steam tests. The onset of resonance due to the single vortex mode was not influenced by pressure conditions and fluid properties. The increase of fluctuating pressure due to the double vortex mode which occurred at Strouhal number values from 0.8 to 0.9 could be clearly seen in the scale model steam tests unlike in the air tests. The results showed that the self-excited acoustic resonance was affected by the static pressure and fluid properties for the scale model air tests. However, no significant influence from steam pressure was seen at pressure higher than 3 MPa. Normalized fluctuating pressure was almost the same regardless of pressure. We verified that normalization by dynamic pressure in the main pipe was a reasonable approach for evaluation of fluctuating pressure in the SRV stub pipes. Increase of fluctuating pressure due to the double vortex mode was clearly distinguished in SRV stub pipes but not strong in the MSL pipes and had insignificant impact on the dryer loading.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


DeBoo, G., Ramsden, K., and Gesior, R., 2006, “Quad Cities Unit 2 Main Steam Line Acoustic Source Identification and Load Reduction,” Paper No. ICONE14-89903.
Ziada, S., 2010, “Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance in Industry,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(1), p. 015001. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, S., Okuyama, K., Tamura, A., Ohtsuka, M., Tsubakai, M., Mabachi, Y., Kubota, T., Ogawa, Y., Inada, F., and Morita, R., 2010, “Fluctuating Pressure Generating in BWR Main Steam Lines Acoustic Excited by Safety Relief Valve Stub Pipes and Dead Legs,” Paper No. ICONE18-29361.
Morita, R., Takahashi, S., Okuyama, K., Inada, F., Ogawa, Y., and Yoshikawa, K., 2011, “Evaluation of Acoustic-and Flow-Induced Vibration of the BWR main Steam Lines and Dryer,” J. Nucl. Technol., 48(5), pp. 759–776. [CrossRef]
Weaver, D. S., and MacLeod, G. O., 1999, “Entrance Port Rounding Effects on Acoustic Resonance in Safety Relief Valves,” ASME Pressure Vessels Piping, 389, pp. 291–297.
Ziada, S., 1993, “A Flow Visualization Study of Flow-Acoustic Coupling at the Mouth of a Resonant Side-Branch,” J. Fluids Struct., 8(4), pp. 391–416. [CrossRef]
Knotts, B. D., and Selamet, A., 2003, “Suppression of Flow-Acoustic Coupling in Sidebranch Ducts by Interface Modification,” J. Acoust. Soc., 265(5), pp. 1025–1045. [CrossRef]
Howe, M. S., 2003, Theory of Vortex Sound, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 36–37.
Sommerville, D. V., 2006, “Scaling Laws for Model Test Based BWR Steam Dryer Fluctuating Load Definitions,” Proc. 2006 Pressure Vessels and Piping/ICPVT-11 Conference, ASME Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 23–27, 2006, Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93703, pp. 1599–1612. [CrossRef]
Hitachi, Ltd., 2011, “Next Generation BWR: HP-ABWR,” Hitachi Review, January Issue, pp. 54–56.
Okuyama, K.Takahashi, S., Tamura, A., Mabachi, Y., Kubota, T., and Kurokawa, T., 2012, “Evaluation of Acoustic and Flow-Induced Vibration of BWR Main Steam Lines and Dryer,” AESJ 2012 Fall Meeting, L26.
Uchiyama, Y., and Morita, R., 2012, “Experimental Evaluation of Acoustic Resonance at Single Stub Pipe in Each Dry and Wet Steam Flow,” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Flow-Induced Vibration.
Takahashi, S., Okuyama, K., Tamura, A., Ohtsuka, M., Yoshikawa, K., Tsubakai, M., and Mabachi, Y., 2009, “Flow-Induced Acoustic Resonance Vibration of Main Steam Lines and Dryer in Boiling Water Reactor,” 6th Annual Conference of Japan Society of Maintenology, B-6-4.
Bruggeman, J. C., Hirschberg, A., van Dongen, M. E. H., Wijnands, A. P. J., and Gorter, J., 1991, “Self-Sustained Aero-Acoustic Pulsations in Gas Transport Systems: Experimental Study of the Influence of Closed Side Branches,” J. Sound Vib., 150, pp. 371–393. [CrossRef]
Ziada, S., and Shine, S., 1999, “Strouhal Number of Flow-Excited Acoustic Resonance of Closed Side Branches,” J. Fluids Struct., 13, pp. 127–142. [CrossRef]
JSME, 1998, “Guideline for Evaluation of Flow-Induced Vibration of a Cylindrical Structure in a Pipe,” JSME S 012, pp. A21–A27.
Graf, H. R., and Ziada, S., 2010, “Excitation Source of a Side-Branch Shear Layer,” J. Sound Vib., 329, pp. 2825–2842. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

BWR steam dome, dryer, and MSLs. Dots in the upper view of the figure represent the locations of the SRVs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Evaluation flow diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flow-induced acoustic resonance at the SRV stub pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic diagram of test loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic diagram of test apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evaluation locations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Influence of Re on fluctuating pressure for a single SRV stub pipe (CFD results)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Frequency spectra of fluctuating pressure and strain (St = 0.55, P = 7 MPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Influence of Strouhal number (P = 7 MPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Results of air tests [2] (P = 0.1 MPa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Vortex modes in SRV stub pipes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Influence of pressure on fluctuating pressure in SRV stub pipes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Variation of frequency of fluctuating pressure (P = 7 MPa)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In