0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Elastic-Route Estimation of Strain Range in Notched Components Under Thermal Loading Without Performing Stress Linearization

[+] Author and Article Information
Terutaka Fujioka

Mem. ASME
Faculty of Science and Engineering,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Toyo University,
2100 Kujirai, Kawagoe,
Saitama 350-8585, Japan
e-mail: fujioka@toyo.jp

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 22, 2014; final manuscript received April 7, 2014; published online October 15, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Albert E. Segall.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(2), 021205 (Oct 15, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1008; doi: 10.1115/1.4027418 History: Received January 22, 2014; Revised April 07, 2014

In this paper, a simplified method is proposed for estimating the strain range produced in notched components under thermal loading for the purpose of assessing fatigue, creep, and creep-fatigue life consumptions. The proposed method is based on the previously proposed stress redistribution locus (SRL) and elastic follow-up factor, which are combined with a new method for evaluating the primary-plus-secondary stress limit. The proposed method does not require the linearization of stresses and was validated by performing elastic-plastic finite element analysis (FEA) of notched components subjected to cyclic thermal loading.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

ASME, 2004, “Boiler and Pressure Vessels Code, Section III—Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components.”
JSME, 2008, “Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities—Rules on Design and Construction for Nuclear Power Plants, Part I: Light Water Reactor Code,” JSME S NC1-2008 (in Japanese).
Kroenke, W. C., 1974, “Classification of Finite Element Stresses According to ASME Section III Stress Categories,” Pressure Vessels Piping Conference, pp. 107–140.
Iida, K., Asada, Y., Okabayashi, K., and Nagata, T., 1987, “Simplified Analysis and Design for Elevated Temperature Components for MONJU,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 98, pp. 305–317. [CrossRef]
The Japan Atomic Power Company, 1999, “Demonstration Fast Breeder Reactor High Temperature Structural Design Guideline.” (in Japanese).
Nakagawa, Y., Ueno, T., Hayashi, M., and Nagata, T., 1995, “Structural Design of Intermediate Heat Exchanger for MONJU Using Partial Inelastic Analyses,” 3rd JSME/ASME Joint International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Kyoto, Vol. 1, pp. 255–259.
Hayashi, M., Fujioka, T., Takahashi, Y., Shimakawa, T., Ueki, Y., Jinbo, M., Ohtani, T., and Morita, H., 1998, “Structural Design of Demonstration Fast Breeder Reactor (DFBR) Applying Elastic Follow-up Factors Estimated by Inelastic Analysis,” ASME Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards Session PVP, Vol. 360, pp. 227–234.
Asada, S., and Nakamura, T., 2011, “Simplified Elastic-Plastic Analysis Methods in the JSME Rules on Design and Construction,” JSME J. Environ. Eng., 6(4), pp. 753–764. [CrossRef]
Fujioka, T., 2008, “Elastic Follow-up Behavior in Power Law Type Inelastic Bodies and Simplified Assessment Methods of Peak Strain and Peak Stress Relaxation Due to Displacement-Controlled Loading,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A, 74(738), pp. 224–231 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Teramae, T., 2008, “The Strain Estimation of Statically Determinate Structures Subjected to Forced Displacement by Reference Stress Method,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A, 74(740), pp. 592–597 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Kasahara, N., 2001, “Strain Concentration Mechanism During Stress Relaxation Process and Its Prediction,” JSME Proceedings of Creep7, pp. 625–629, Paper No. SA-12-3(006).
Fujioka, T., 2007, “Assessment Methods of Bree Type Ratcheting Without the Necessity of Linearization of Stresses and Strains,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A, 73(733), pp. 1045–1051 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Asada, S., Hirano, T., Nagata, T., and Kasahara, N., 2008, “Structural Evaluation Method for Class 1 Vessels by Using Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis in Code Case JSME Rules on Design and Construction,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A, 74(748), pp. 1485–1492 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Asada, S., Yamashita, N., Okamoto, A., and Nishiguchi, I., 2002, “Verification of Alternative Criteria for Shakedown Evaluation Using Flat Head Vessel,” Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards, PVP, Vol. 439, pp. 17–22, Paper No. PVP2002-1217. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of relationship between nonlinear stress distribution and equivalent bending stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Thermally loaded cylinder for sample numerical analyses (mechanical and thermal boundary conditions, dimensions in mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Finite element mesh subdivisions of analyzed cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Thermal loading applied to cylinder in elastic-plastic FEA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of total strain ranges obtained by elastic-plastic FEA and simplified methods (notch radius = 10 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of total strain ranges obtained by elastic-plastic FEA and simplified methods (notch radius = 5 mm)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In