0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Study on In-Flow Fluidelastic Instability of Triangular Tube Arrays Subjected to Air Cross Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
Tomomichi Nakamura

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Osaka Sangyo University,
3-1-1 Daito,
Osaka 574-8530, Japan
e-mail: t-nak@mech.osaka-sandai.ac.jp

Yoshiaki Fujita, Takuya Sumitani

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Osaka Sangyo University,
3-1-1 Daito,
Osaka 574-8530, Japan

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 30, 2013; final manuscript received April 10, 2014; published online August 19, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Samir Ziada.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 136(5), 051302 (Aug 19, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-13-1175; doi: 10.1115/1.4027618 History: Received September 30, 2013; Revised April 10, 2014

The in-flow instability of cylinder arrays corresponds to the in-plane instability of U-bend tubes in steam generators. This rarely occurring phenomenon has recently been observed in a nuclear power plant in the U.S. For this reason, the importance of studying this instability has recently increased. The fluidelastic instability of a cylinder array caused by cross-flow was found to easily occur in air-flow and hardly in water-flow in our previous report. The present report introduces the results of this phenomenon in several patterns of triangular cylinder arrays in air-flow. The pitch spacing between cylinders is one of the parameters, which varies from P/D = 1.2 to 1.5, for a five-by-five cylinder array. The instability is examined both in the in-flow direction and in the transverse direction. The test cylinders are supported with thin plates to move in one direction. The number and the location of the flexibly supported cylinders are the other parameters. Differences between the instability in the in-flow and in the transverse direction are found. Among these differences the most important is the fact that the fluidelastic instability has not been observed for a single flexible cylinder in the in-flow direction, although it is observed in the transverse direction. However, the present preliminary results suggest that the in-flow instability may be estimated with the Connors' type formula as likely as in the transverse direction case.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

JSME, 1998, “Guideline for Evaluation of Flow-Induced Vibration of a Cylindrical Structure in a Pipe,” JSME Standard S 012. (in Japanese).
Janzen, V., Hagberg, E. G., Pettigrew, M. J., and Taylor, C. E., 2005, “Fluidelastic Instability and Work-Rate Measurements of Steam-Generator U-Tubes in Air-Water Cross-Flow,” ASME's J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 127(1), pp. 84–91. [CrossRef]
Paidoussis, M. P., 1987, “Flow Induced Instabilities of Cylindrical Structures,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 40, pp. 163–175. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., Nishimura, K., Fujita, Y., and Kohara, C., 2011, “Study on In-Flow Vibration of Cylinder Arrays Caused by Cross Flow,” ASME Paper No. PVP2011-57068. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., Fujita, Y., Oyakawa, T., and Ni, Y., 2012, “Study on In-Flow Fluid-Elastic Instability of Circular Cylinder Arrays,” Proceedings of FIV2012, pp. 99–106.
Zhu, S., Cai, Y., and Chen, S. S., 1995, “Experimental Fluid-Force Coefficients for Wake-Induced Cylinder Vibration,” J. Eng. Mech., 121(9), pp. 1003–1015. [CrossRef]
Violette, R., Pettigrew, M. J., and Mureithi, N. W., 2006, “Fluidelastic Instability of an Array of Tubes Preferentially Flexible in the Flow Direction Subjected to Two-Phase Cross Flow,” ASME's J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 128(1), pp. 148–159. [CrossRef]
Khalvatti, A., Mureithi, N. W., and Pettigrew, M. J., 2010, “Effect of Preferential Flexibility Direction on Fluidelastic Instability of a Rotated Triangular Tube Bundle,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(4), p. 041309. [CrossRef]
Southern California Edison, 2012, “San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 Return to Service Report,” Web on NRC, pp. 1–54.
Mureithi, N. W., Zang, C., and Ruel, M., 2005, “Fluidelastic Instability Tests on an Array of Tubes Preferentially Flexible in the Flow Direction,” J. Fluids Struct., 21, pp. 75–87. [CrossRef]
Roberts, B. W., 1966, “Low Frequency, Aeroelastic Vibrations in a Cascade of Circular Cylinders,” Mech. Eng. Sci. Monogr., 4, pp. 1–29.
Paidoussis, M. P., Price, S. J., and de Langre, E., 2011, Fluid-Structure Interactions Cross-Flow-Induced Instabilities, Cambridge University, New York, pp. 220–232.
Shahriary, S., Mureithi, N. W., and Pettigrew, M. J., 2007, “Quasi-Static and Stability Analysis in a Triangular Tube Bundle Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flow,” ASME Paper No. PVP2007-26017. [CrossRef]
Kishimoto, S., Ando, M., Imoto, K., Nakamura, T., and Mureithi, N. W., 2013, “Study on In-flow Fluidelastic Instability of Circular Cylinder Arrays,” Proceedings of H24 JSME's Kansai Students Paper Conference, pp. 13–17. (in Japanese).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test equipment (a) test facilities and (b) image of measurement cylinder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Basic cylinder array; instrumented cylinders are labeled 1–9

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pattern of flexible cylinders (a) seven flexible cylinder cluster (flexible cluster) and (b) column of flexible cylinders (flexible column)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Vibration response of cylinders in the flexible array (P/D = 1.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vibration response of cylinders in the flexible cluster configuration (P/D = 1.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Vibration response of cylinders for the flexible column configuration (P/D = 1.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Vibration response of single flexible cylinder in transverse direction (P/D = 1.5)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Vibration response of cylinders in fully flexible array (P/D = 1.4)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Vibration response of cylinders in flexible column (P/D = 1.4)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Vibration response of single flexible cylinder (P/D = 1.4)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Vibration response of cylinders in flexible array (P/D = 1.3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Vibration response of cylinders in flexible column (P/D = 1.3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Vibration response of single flexible cylinder (P/D = 1.3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Vibration response of cylinders in the flexible array (P/D = 1.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Vibration response of cylinders in flexible cluster (P/D = 1.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Vibration response of cylinders in the flexible column configuration (P/D = 1.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Vibration response of single flexible cylinder (P/D = 1.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Effect of pitch ratio P/D (all flexible)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Effect of flexible cylinder (a) inflow direction and (b) transverse direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Image of flow path between cylinders

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In