Research Papers: Codes and Standards

Study on Flaw-to-Surface Proximity Rule for Transforming Subsurface Flaws to Surface Flaws Based on Fatigue Crack Growth Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Kunio Hasegawa, Yinsheng Li

Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA),
Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken 319-1195, Japan

Koichi Saito

Hitachi Works,
Hitachi-GE Nuclear Energy Ltd.,
Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken 319-1221, Japan

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received June 20, 2014; final manuscript received August 15, 2014; published online February 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(4), 041101 (Aug 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1092; doi: 10.1115/1.4028423 History: Received June 20, 2014; Revised August 15, 2014; Online February 20, 2015

If a subsurface flaw is located very near a component surface, the subsurface flaw is categorized as a surface flaw. The boundary of the subsurface and surface flaws is required for flaw evaluation. The subsurface flaw is transformed to a surface flaw in accordance with a flaw-to-surface proximity rule. The recharacterization process from subsurface to surface flaw is adopted in all fitness-for-service (FFS) codes. However, the specific criteria of the recharacterizations are different among the FFS codes. Cyclic tensile experiment was conducted on a carbon steel flat plate with a subsurface flaw at ambient temperature. The objective of the paper is to compare the experiment and calculation of fatigue crack growth behavior for a subsurface flaw and the transformed surface flaw, and to check the validity of the flaw-to-surface proximity rule defined by ASME Code Section XI, JSME S NA1 Code and other codes.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Flat plate block with a surface notch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fracture surface of flat plate specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fatigue crack growth of specimen FE 10-1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fatigue crack growth of specimen FE 10-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fatigue crack growth of specimen FE 25-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Fatigue crack growth of specimen FE 40-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fatigue crack growth of specimen FE 50-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Proximity factor Y (=S/a) obtained by experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Definition of subsurface and surface flaws

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Subsurface and surface flaws transformed from subsurface flaw




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In