Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Local and Global Reference Stress for Circumferential Irregular-Shaped Defects in Pipes

[+] Author and Article Information
Igor Orynyak

IPP-Centre Ltd.,
8, Strutyns'kogo, Street,
Kyiv 01014, Ukraine
e-mail: igor_orinyak@yahoo.com

Sergii Ageiev

IPP-Centre Ltd.,
8, Strutyns'kogo, Street,
Kyiv 01014, Ukraine
e-mail: ageev_serg@ukr.net

Sergii Radchenko

IPP-Centre Ltd.,
8, Strutyns'kogo, Street,
Kyiv 01014, Ukraine
e-mail: rad_s@mail.ru

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received June 27, 2014; final manuscript received September 24, 2014; published online February 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Haofeng Chen.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(4), 041203 (Aug 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1098; doi: 10.1115/1.4028680 History: Received June 27, 2014; Revised September 24, 2014; Online February 20, 2015

Numerical procedures for calculation of reference stresses for pipelines with circumferential defects, based on simulation of global and local ultimate plastic states, are proposed. There are some peculiarities of proposed procedures. First, the schematic analysis of the deformation process of pipe with surface defects is suggested, based on which two critical cases have been specified: Global (the net-section-collapse (NSC) criterion) and local, which are applicable for a very wide surface defect and for a sharp crack, respectively. The global solution also describes behavior of through-wall defects. Second, within the framework of the available NSC criterion the unified algorithm for determination of reference stresses (global solution) for irregular-shaped circumferential defects under multifactor loading (internal pressure, axial force, bending moment) is proposed. Third, according to the local modeling, the restricted capability to resist plastic deformations is takes into account by inserting of artificial symmetrical defect. The unified procedure for calculation of reference stresses (local solution) for pipe with irregular-shaped circumferential defects under multifactor loading is developed. Finally, the results obtained from the proposed solutions are compared with the ones from full-scale burst tests.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wilkowski, G., 2000, “Leak-Before-Break: What Does It Really Mean,” ASME J. Press. Vessel Technol., 122(3), pp. 267–272. [CrossRef]
R/H/R6: Revision 4, 2001, “ Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects,” British Energy Generation.
Orynyak, I. V., and Ageev, S. M., 2009, “Modelling the Limiting Plastic State of Heavy-Walled Pipes With Axial Surface Defects,” J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab., 38(4), pp. 407–413. [CrossRef]
Orynyak, I. V., 2006, “Leak and Break Models of Pressurized Pipe with Axial Defects,” Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 41–56, Paper No. IPC2006-10066.
Ranta-Maunus, A. K., and Achenbach, J. D., 1980, “Stability of Circumferential Through Cracks in Ductile Pipes,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 60(3), pp. 339–345. [CrossRef]
Kanninen, M. F., Zahoor, A., Wilkowski, G., Abou-Sayed, I., Marschall, C., Broek, D., Sampath, S., Rhee, C., and Ahmad, J., 1982, “Instability Predictions for Circumferentially Cracked Type-304 Stainless Steel Pipes Under Dynamic Loading,” EPRI NP-2347, Vol. 1–2.
Schulze, H. D., Togler, G., and Bodmann, E., 1980, “Fracture Mechanics Analysis on the Initiation and Propagation of Circumferential and Longitudinal Cracks in Straight Pipes and Pipe Bends,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 58(1), pp. 19–31. [CrossRef]
Kastner, W., Roehrich, E., Schmitt, W., and Steinbuch, R., 1981, “Critical Crack Sizes in Ductile Piping,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 9(3), pp. 197–219. [CrossRef]
Firmature, R., and Rahman, S., 2000, “Elastic-Plastic Analysis of Off-Center Cracks in Cylindrical Structures,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 66(1), pp. 15–39. [CrossRef]
Hengmu, S., 2002, “The Plastic Limit Load of Circumferentially Cracked Thin-Walled Pipes Under Axial Force, Internal Pressure and Asymmetrical Bending,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 79(5), pp. 377–382. [CrossRef]
Sim, R. G., 1968, “Creep of Structures,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Ainsworth, R. A., 1984, “The Assessment of Defects in Structures of Strain Hardening Material,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 19(4), pp. 633–642. [CrossRef]
Hodge, F. G., 1963, Calculations of Structures With Account of Plastic Deformations, Mashgiz, Moscow, p. 256.
Kim, Y. J., and Shim, D. J., 2005, “Relevance of Plastic Limit Loads to Reference Stress Approach for Surface Cracked Cylinder Problems,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 82(9), pp. 687–699. [CrossRef]
Rahman, S., and Wilkowski, G., 1998, “Net-Section-Collapse Analysis of Circumferentially Cracked Cylinders. Part I: Arbitrary-Shaped Cracks and Generalized Equations,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 61(2), pp. 191–211. [CrossRef]
API RP 579, 2000, “ Recommended Practice for Fitness-for-Service,” American Petroleum Institute.
Orynyak, I. V., 1997, “Calculation of the Ultimate Plastic State of Thick-Walled Pipe Bend in the Circumferential Direction,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 73(3), pp. 229–239. [CrossRef]
Kiefner, J. F., Maxey, W. A., Eiber, R. J., and Duffy, A. R., 1973, “Fracture Stress Levels of Flaws in Pressurized Cylinders,” Progress in Flaw Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing, pp. 461–481, Paper No. ASTM STP 536.
Ivlev, D. D., 1966, Theory of the Ideal Plasticity, Nauka, Moscow, p. 232.
Wilkowski, G. M., and Eiber, R. J., 1981, “Evaluation of Tensile Failure of Girth Weld Repair Grooves in Pipe Subjected to Offshore Laying Stresses,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 103(1), pp. 48–57. [CrossRef]
Görner, F., and Munz, D., 1983, “Leak-Before-Break Diagrams Using Simple Plastic Limit Load Criteria for Pipes With Circumferential Cracks,” Proceedings of the CSNI Specialist Meeting on Leak-Before-Break in Nuclear Reactor Piping, Monterey, CA, Paper No. NUREG/CP-0051.
Hasegawa, K., Sakata, S., Shimizu, T., and Shida, S., 1983, “Prediction of Fracture Tolerances for Stainless Steel Pipes With Circumferential Cracks,” 4th ASME Pressure Vessels Pipe Conference, Portland, OR, pp. 65–78.
Orynyak, I. V., 1993, “Calculating the Pressure of Ductile Failure of a Pipe With an Axial Through Crack,” Strength Mater., 25(4), pp. 266–274. [CrossRef]
Lei, Y., and Budden, P. J., 2004, “Limit Load Solutions for Thin-Walled Cylinders With Circumferential Cracks Under Combined Internal Pressure, Axial Tension and Bending,” J. Strain Anal., 39(6), pp. 673–683. [CrossRef]
Miyazaki, K., Kanno, S., Ishiwata, M., Hasegawa, K., Ahn, S. H., and Ando, K., 1999, “Fracture Behavior of Carbon Steel Pipe With Local Wall Thinning Subject to Bending Load,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 191(2), pp. 195–204. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y. J., Oh, C. K., Park, C. Y., and Hasegawa, K., 2006, “Net-Section Limit Load Approach for Failure Strength Estimates of Pipes With Local Wall Thinning,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 83(7), pp. 546–555. [CrossRef]
Stadtmuller, W., and Sturm, D., 1997, “Leak-Before-Break Behavior of Austenitic and Ferritic Pipes Containing Circumferential Defects,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 174(3), pp. 335–342. [CrossRef]
Orynyak, I. V., Vlasenko, N. I., Kozlov, V. Ya., Andrieshin, Ya. A., Chechin, É. V., Buiskikh, K. P., Ageev, S. M., and Yanko, O. A., 2012, “Test Results for Edge-Notched Pipe Specimens Within Framework of Experimental Substantiation of the Leak-Before-Break Phenomenon,” Strength Mater., 44(5), pp. 562–573. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Stress distribution according to data [21] (a) and [22] (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Distribution of strains in defect-free infinite pipe (a) and in cracked infinite pipe (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Distribution of displacements (a) and strains and stresses (b) in cracked pipe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cross section of a pipe with an imaginary defect of a constant depth φ0<(π/2)-ψ (a) and irregular shape (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Boundary between leak and break

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of calculated and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pipe specimen with notch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Cross section of pipe specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Scheme of pipe specimen loading by bending moment




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In