Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Residual Stress in the Welding Joint of Layered Cylindrical Vessels Including the Weld Clad Effect

[+] Author and Article Information
Shugen Xu

College of Chemical Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Qingdao 266555, China
e-mail: xsg123@163.com

Chong Wang

College of Chemical Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Qingdao 266555, China
e-mail: 327438097@qq.com

Yanling Zhao

College of Chemical Engineering,
China University of Petroleum,
Qingdao 266555, China
e-mail: zhaoyanling98@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 10, 2014; final manuscript received September 18, 2014; published online February 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(4), 041405 (Aug 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1065; doi: 10.1115/1.4028726 History: Received April 10, 2014; Revised September 18, 2014; Online February 20, 2015

Layered cylindrical vessels are widely used in process industries. The weld clad is applied before the girth welding of layered-to-layered sections. In this paper, a numerical method was used to predict residual stresses in a layered-to-layered joint with weld clad. The results showed that high residual stresses were generated in the weld and heat affect zone (HAZ), and a discontinuous stress distribution was generated. The through-wall axial residual stress at the weld centerline (WCL) was predominately tensile. The axial residual stress in each layer at the HAZ demonstrated a bending type distribution. The through-wall hoop residual stress at the WCL was predominately compressive in the V-groove zone, and it was tensile in the U-groove zone. The weld clad can decrease the peak residual stress in the tip of the interlayer gaps.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


ASME, 2007, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec. VIII-1, ASME, NY.
Wang, W. Q., Li, A. J., Zhu, Y. Y., Yao, X. J., Liu, Y., and Chen, Z. H., 2009, “The Explosion Reason Analysis of Urea Reactor of Pingyin,” Eng. Failure Anal., 16(3), pp. 972–986. [CrossRef]
Taljat, B., Radhakrishnan, B., and Zacharia, T., 1998, “Numerical Analysis of GTA Welding Process With Emphasis on Post-Solidification Phase Transformation Effects on the Residual Stresses,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 246(1–2), pp. 45–54. [CrossRef]
Ghosh, S., Rana, V. P. S., Kain, V., Mittal, V., and Baveja, S. K., 2011, “Role of Residual Stresses Induced by Industrial Fabrication on Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Austenitic Stainless Steel,” Mater. Des., 32(7), pp. 3823–3831. [CrossRef]
Martins, J. A., Cardoso, L. P., Fraymann, J. A., and Button, S. T., 2006, “Analyses of Residual Stresses on Stamped Valves by X-Ray Diffraction and Finite Elements Method,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 179(1–3), pp. 30–35. [CrossRef]
Bouchard, P. J., George, D., Santisteban, J. R., Bruno, G., Dutta, M., and Edwards, L., 2005, “Measurement of the Residual Stresses in a Stainless Steel Pipe Girth Weld Containing Long and Short Repairs,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 82(4), pp. 299–310. [CrossRef]
Woo, W. C., Em, V., Hubbard, C. R., Lee, H. J., and Park, K. S., 2011, “Residual Stress Determination in a Dissimilar Weld Overlay Pipe by Neutron Diffraction,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 528(27), pp. 8021–8027. [CrossRef]
Bae, H. Y., Kim, Y. J., Kim, J. H., Lee, S. H., Lee, K. S., and Park, C. Y., 2014, “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Welding Residual Stress Analysis of Penetration Nozzles: I–Sensitivity of Analysis Variables,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 114–115(1), pp. 1–15. [CrossRef]
Zhao, L., Liang, J., Zhong, Q. P., Yang, C., Sun, B., and Du, J. F., 2014, “Numerical Simulation on the Effect of Welding Parameters on Welding Residual Stresses in T92/S30432 Dissimilar Welded Pipe,” Adv. Eng. Software, 68(1), pp. 70–79. [CrossRef]
Deng, D., 2013, “Influence of Deposition Sequence on Welding Residual Stress and Deformation in an Austenitic Stainless Steel J-Groove Welded Joint,” Mater. Des., 49(1), pp. 1022–1033. [CrossRef]
Song, M. D., Wang, W. Q., Zhao, Y. F., and Cui, Y. L., 2007, “Urea Reactor Integrity Evaluation Based on Failure Analysis,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 129(4), pp. 744–753. [CrossRef]
Xu, S. G., Wang, W. Q., and Li, M. L., 2012, “A Modified Weld Structure of Layered Urea Reactor Based on Stress Analysis and Leak Detection,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 134(3), p. 031203. [CrossRef]
Xu, S. G., Wang, W. Q., Song, M. D., Li, M. L., and Tang, J., 2010, “Modified Formulation of Layer Stresses due to Internal Pressure of a Layered Vessel With Interlayer Gaps,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(5), p. 051201. [CrossRef]
Jiang, W. C., Xu, X. P., Gong, J. M., and Tu, S. T., 2012, “Influence of Repair Length on Residual Stress in the Repair Weld of a Clad Plate,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 246(1), pp. 211–219. [CrossRef]
Yaghi, A., Hyde, T. H., Becker, A. A., Sun, W., and Williams, J. A., 2006, “Residual Stress Simulation in Thin and Thick-Walled Stainless Steel Pipe Welds Including Pipe Diameter Effects,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 83(11−12), pp. 864–874. [CrossRef]
Deng, D., and Kiyoshima, S., 2010, “FEM Prediction of Welding Residual Stresses in a SUS304 Girth-Welded Pipe With Emphasis on Stress Distribution Near Weld Start/End Location,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 50(2), pp. 612–621. [CrossRef]
Lee, C. H., and Chang, K. H., 2008, “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Simulation of Residual Stresses in Circumferential Welds of Steel Pipe Including Pipe Diameter Effects,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 487(1−2), pp. 210–218. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Cracks initiated in the welding joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cracks in the welding joint cross section. The outside diameter and inner diameter of the layered cylinder are 1620 mm and 1400 mm, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensions of the groove and the layers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Welding sequence and passes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

FE mesh within the fusion zone

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Location of reference paths and boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Geometrical model of weld to verify the FE analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

A comparison of the hoop (a) and axial residual stress (b) by our FEM and Lee's experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Temperature contours during the laying of different weld passes: (a) pass 13, (b) pass 20, (c) pass 29, and (d) pass 38 (unit: °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Welding temperature cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Residual stress contours: (a) von Mises, (b) S11, (c) S22, and (d) S33 (unit: Pa)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Stress distribution along WCL (P1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Stress distribution along HAZ (P4)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Stress distribution along inner surface (P2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Stress distribution along outer surface (P3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Locations of the selected nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Effect of clad weld on residual axial stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Effect of clad weld on residual hoop stress




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In