0
Research Papers: Seismic Engineering

Study on Minimum Wall Thickness Requirement for Seismic Buckling of Reactor Vessel Based on System Based Code Concept

[+] Author and Article Information
Shigeru Takaya

Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
4002 Narita, O-arai,
Ibaraki 311-1393, Japan
e-mail: takaya.shigeru@jaea.go.jp

Daigo Watanabe

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.,
5-717-1 Fukahori, Nagasaki,
Nagasaki 851-0392, Japan
e-mail: daigo_watanabe@mhi.co.jp

Shinobu Yokoi

Mitsubishi FBR Systems, Inc.,
2-34-17 Jingumae, Shibuya,
Tokyo 150-0001, Japan
e-mail: shinobu_yokoi@mfbr.mhi.co.jp

Yoshio Kamishima

Mitsubishi FBR Systems, Inc.,
2-34-17 Jingumae, Shibuya,
Tokyo 150-0001, Japan
e-mail: yoshio_kamishima@mfbr.mhi.co.jp

Kenichi Kurisaka

Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
4002 Narita, O-arai,
Ibaraki 311-1393, Japan
e-mail: kurisaka.kennichi@jaea.go.jp

Tai Asayama

Japan Atomic Energy Agency,
4002 Narita, O-arai,
Ibaraki 311-1393, Japan
e-mail: asayama.tai@jaea.go.jp

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 12, 2014; final manuscript received November 26, 2014; published online February 24, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Spyros A. Karamanos.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(5), 051802 (Oct 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1003; doi: 10.1115/1.4029322 History: Received January 12, 2014; Revised November 26, 2014; Online February 24, 2015

The minimum wall thickness required to prevent seismic buckling of a reactor vessel (RV) in a fast reactor is derived using the system based code (SBC) concept. One of the key features of SBC concept is margin optimization; to implement this concept, the reliability design method is employed, and the target reliability for seismic buckling of the RV is derived from nuclear plant safety goals. Input data for reliability evaluation, such as distribution type, mean value, and standard deviation of random variables, are also prepared. Seismic hazard is considered to evaluate uncertainty of seismic load. Minimum wall thickness required to achieve the target reliability is evaluated, and is found to be less than that determined from a conventional deterministic design method. Furthermore, the influence of each random variable on the evaluation is investigated, and it is found that the seismic load has a significant impact.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Asada, Y., Tashimo, M., and Ueta, M., 2002, “System Based Code—Principal Concept,” ASME Paper No. ICONE10-22730. [CrossRef]
Asada, Y., Tashimo, M., and Ueta, M., 2002, “System Based Code—Basic Structure,” ASME Paper No. ICONE10-22731. [CrossRef]
Asada, Y., 2006, “Japanese Activities Concerning Nuclear Codes and Standards—Part II,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 128(1), pp. 64–70. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Kawasaki, N., and Morishita, M., 2004, “An Integrated Approach for the Structural Reliability Evaluation of Fast Breeder Reactor Components,” ASME Paper No. PVP2004-3004. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Kawasaki, N., Morishita, M., Shibamoto, H., and Inoue, K., 2008, “Balancing Material Selection and Inspection Requirements in Structural Design of Fast Breeder Reactors on ‘System Based Code’ Concept,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(2), pp. 417–422. [CrossRef]
Morishita, M., Asayama, T., and Tashimo, M., 2006, “Development of System Based Code—Methodologies for Life-Cycle Margin Evaluation,” ASME Paper No. ICONE14-89393. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Takasho, H., and Kato, T., 2008, “Probabilistic Prediction of Crack Depth Distributions Observed in Structures Subjected to Thermal Fatigue,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 131(1), p. 011402. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Kato, T., and Morishita, M., 2006, “Development of Material and Structural Reliability Evaluation System MSS-REAL,” ASME Paper No. ICONE14-89760. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Morishita, M., and Tashimo, M., 2006, “Development of System Based Code—Case Study of Life-Cycle Margin Evaluation,” ASME Paper No. ICONE14-89397. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., Shibamoto, H., Otani, T., and Morishita, M., 2007, “Applicability of the System Based Code Concept to the Life-Cycle Design Optimization of Nuclear Components,” Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, Apr. 22–26, Paper No. ICONE15-10835.
Asayama, T., 2009, “Methodology for the Determination of a Set of Safety Factors that are Consistent for Design Code and Fitness-for-Service Code: Framework,” ASME Paper No. PVP2009-77333. [CrossRef]
Asayama, T., 2009, “Methodology for the Determination of a Set of Safety Factors that are Consistent for Design Code and Fitness-for-Service Code: Case Study for Fast Breeder Reactors,” ASME Paper No. PVP2009-77686. [CrossRef]
Kurisaka, K., Nakai, R., Asayama, T., and Takaya, S., 2011, “Development of System Based Code (1) Reliability Target Derivation of Structures and Components,” J. Power Energy Syst., 5(1), pp. 19–32. [CrossRef]
Takaya, S., Okajima, S., Kurisaka, K., Asayama, T., Machida, H., and Kamishima, Y., 2011, “Development of System Based Code (2) Application of Reliability Target for Configuration of ISI Requirement,” J. Power Energy Syst., 5(1), pp. 60–68. [CrossRef]
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S., 2000, Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design, Wiley, New York.
Morishita, M., Aoto, K., Kasahara, N., Asayama, T., Nakamura, K., Inoue, K., Nagashima, H., and Shibamoto, H., 2005, “Study on Advanced Structural Design for Commercialized Fast Breeder Reactors,” JAEA Report, Report No. JNC-TY9400-2005-012-2 (in Japanese).
Matsuura, S., Nakamura, H., Ogiso, S., Murakami, T., and Kawamoto, Y., 1993, “Formulae for Evaluating Buckling Strength of FBR Main Vessels Under Earthquake Loading,” JSME Int. J., B, 36(3), pp. 485–492. [CrossRef]
The Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 2007, “Standard for Procedure of Seismic Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants,” Report No. AESJ-SC-P006 (in Japanese).
The Japan Atomic Power Company, 2008, “Estimation of the Basis Ground Motion at Tokai No. 2 Power Station,” http://www.nsr.go.jp/archive/nisa/shingikai/107/3/1/006/6-2-1-2.pdf (in Japanese).
Kurisaka, K., and Okamura, S., 2011, “Preliminary Evaluation of JSFR Achievement Level to Risk Targets,” Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Paper No. 43802.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2009, “Seismic Fragility Applications Guide Update,” Technical Report No. 1019200.
Pisharady, A. S., and Basu, P. C., 2010, “Methods to Derive Seismic Fragility of NPP Components: A Summary,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 240(11), pp. 3878–3887. [CrossRef]
Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, 2011, “Elastomeric Seismic-Protection Isolators for Building—Part 1: Specifications,” Report No. JIS K6410-1.
International Organization for Standardization, 2010, “Elastomeric Seismic-Protection Isolators-Part 3: Applications for Building-Specifications,” Report No. ISO 22762-3.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007, “Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,” Regulatory Guide 1.61.
The Japan Electric Association, 2008, “Technical Code for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,” Report No. JEAC4601 (in Japanese).
Komine, R., 1996, “Materials Properties Data Sheet of 316FR Steel in Air (No. 1),” JAEA Report, Report No. JNC TN9450 96-016, (in Japanese).
The Japan Atomic Power Company, 1999, Elevated Temperature Structural Design Guide for Demonstration Fast Breeder Reactors, Material Strength Standards (Draft), The Japan Atomic Power Company, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A system event tree to identify seismic core damage sequences [13]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Estimated seismic hazard using the uniform hazard spectrum at Tokai No. 2 power station (thickness = 50 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Probability distribution of annual maximum seismic ground motion normalized to the design basis earthquake for JSFR (thickness = 50 mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Seismic ground response spectra (damping coefficient of the soil: 5%) [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Seismic response analysis model in the horizontal direction [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Seismic response analysis model in the vertical direction [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Cumulative probability of normalized yield stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relationship between wall thickness and annual buckling probability

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In