0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

The Effect of Flat Bar Supports on Streamwise Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Arrays

[+] Author and Article Information
Marwan Hassan

School of Engineering,
University of Guelph,
Guelph, ON N1G2W1, Canada
e-mail: mahassan@uoguelph.ca

David S. Weaver

Mechanical Engineering Department,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S4L7, Canada
e-mail: weaverds@mcmaster.ca

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 7, 2014; final manuscript received March 3, 2015; published online April 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Jong Chull Jo.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(6), 061302 (Dec 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1198; doi: 10.1115/1.4029973 History: Received December 07, 2014; Revised March 03, 2015; Online April 16, 2015

Flow-induced vibration is an important criterion for the design of heat exchangers in nuclear, fossil, and chemical plants. Of the several known vibration excitation mechanisms, fluidelastic instability (FEI) is the most serious because it can cause tube failures in a relatively short period of time. Traditionally, FEI has been observed to occur in the direction transverse to the flow and antivibration bars have been used to stiffen the tubes against this motion. More recently, interest has increased in the possibility of FEI occurring in the streamwise direction, parallel to the flow. This is the subject of the present paper. Numerical simulations have been carried out to study the effects of tube-to-support clearance, tube sliding friction, tube-to-support preload, and ambient turbulence levels on the FEI threshold in the streamwise direction. As one would expect, increasing friction and tube preload against the support both tend to stabilize the tube against streamwise FEI. Importantly, the results also show that decreasing tube-support clearances destabilizes streamwise FEI while having little effect on transverse FEI. Increasing ambient turbulence levels also has the effect of destabilizing streamwise FEI.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Roberts, B., 1966, Low Frequency, Aeroelastic Vibrations in a Cascade of Circular Cylinders (Mechanical Engineering Science Monograph Vol. 4), IMechE, London.
Connors, H. J., 1970, Fluidelastic Vibration of Tube Arrays Excited by Cross Flow, D. D.Reiff, ed., ASME, New York.
Païdoussis, M., 1983, “A Review of Flow-Induced Vibrations in Reactors and Reactor Components,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 74(1), pp. 31–60. [CrossRef]
Weaver, D., and Fitzpatrick, J., 1988, “A Review of Crossflow Induced Vibrations in Heat Exchanger Tube Arrays,” J. Fluids Struct., 2(1), pp. 73–93. [CrossRef]
Pettigrew, M. J., and Taylor, C. E., 1991, “Fluidelastic Instability of Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles: Review and Design Recommendations,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 113(2), pp. 242–256. [CrossRef]
Schröder, K., and Gelbe, H., 1999, “New Design Recommendations for Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” J. Fluids Struct., 13(3), pp. 361–379. [CrossRef]
Price, S. J., 1995, “A Review of Theoretical Models for Fluidelastic Instability of Cylinder Arrays in Cross-Flow,” J. Fluids Struct., 9(5), pp. 463–518. [CrossRef]
Pettigrew, M. J., and Taylor, C. E., 1994, “Two-Phase Flow-Induced Vibration: An Overview (Survey Paper),” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 116(3), pp. 233–253. [CrossRef]
Pettigrew, M., and Taylor, C., 2003, “Vibration Analysis of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers: An Overview—Part 1: Flow, Damping, Fluidelastic Instability,” J. Fluids Struct., 18(5), pp. 469–483. [CrossRef]
Pettigrew, M., and Taylor, C., 2003, “Vibration Analysis of Steam Generators and Heat Exchangers: An Overview—Part 2: Vibration Response, Fretting-Wear, Guidelines,” J. Fluids Struct., 18(5), pp. 485–500. [CrossRef]
Weaver, D. S., 2008, “Some Thoughts on the Elusive Mechanism of Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Arrays,” Keynote Paper, The 9th International Conference on Flow-Induced Vibrations FIV-2008, I.Zolotarev and J.Horacek, eds., Institute of Thermomechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, pp. 21–28.
Weaver, D., and Schneider, W., 1983, “The Effect of Flat Bar Supports on the Crossflow Induced Response of Heat Exchanger U-Tubes,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 105(4), pp. 775–781. [CrossRef]
Au-Yang, M. K., 2001, Flow-Induced Vibration of Power and Process Plant Components: A Practical Workbook, ASME, New York.
Weaver, D., and Koroyannakis, D., 1983, “Flow Induced Vibrations of Heat Exchanger U-Tubes, A Simulation to Study the Effects of Asymmetric Stiffness,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 105(1), pp. 67–75. [CrossRef]
Yetisir, M., and Weaver, D., 1986, “The Dynamics of Heat Exchanger U-Bend Tubes With Flat-Bar Supports,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 108(4), pp. 406–412. [CrossRef]
Mureithi, N., Zhang, C., Ruel, M., and Pettigrew, M., 2005, “Fluidelastic Instability Tests on an Array of Tubes Preferentially Flexible in the Flow Direction,” J. Fluids Struct., 21(1), pp. 75–87. [CrossRef]
Janzen, V. P., Hagberg, E. G., Pettigrew, M. J., and Taylor, C. E., 2005, “Fluidelastic Instability and Work-Rate Measurements of Steam-Generator U-Tubes in Air-Water Crossflow,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 127(1), pp. 84–91. [CrossRef]
Violette, R., Pettigrew, M. J., and Mureithi, N. W., 2005, “Fluidelastic Instability of an Array of Tubes Preferentially Flexible in the Flow Direction Subjected to Two-Phase Cross Flow,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 128(1), pp. 148–159. [CrossRef]
Feenstra, P., Nakamura, T., and Weaver, D. S., 2009, “Two Phase Flow-Induced Vibration of Parallel Triangular Tube Arrays With Asymmetric Support Stiffness,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 131(3), p. 031301. [CrossRef]
Hirota, H., Morita, H., Hirai, J., Iwasaki, A., Utsumi, S., Shimamura, K., and Kawakami, R., “Investigation on In-Flow Fluidelastic Instability of an Array of Tubes,” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97163. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., Fijita, Y., and Sumitani, T., 2013, “Study on In-Flow Fluidelastic Instability of Circular Cylinders Caused by Air Cross Flow (Triangular Arrays),” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97111. [CrossRef]
Janzen, V., Han, Y., and Pettigrew, M., 2009, “Design Specifications to Ensure Flow-Induced Vibration and Fretting Wear Performance in CANDU Steam Generators and Heat Exchangers,” ASME Paper No. PVP2009-78078, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Hassan, M., Weaver, D., and Dokainish, M., 2002, “A Simulation of the Turbulence Response of Heat Exchanger Tubes in Lattice-Bar Supports,” J. Fluids Struct., 16(8), pp. 1145–1176. [CrossRef]
Oengören, A., and Ziada, S., 1998, “An In-Depth Study of Vortex Shedding, Acoustic Resonance and Turbulent Forces in Normal Triangle Tube Arrays,” J. Fluids Struct., 12(6), pp. 717—758. [CrossRef]
Nakamura, T., 2014, “An Analysis of In-Flow Fluidelastic Instability Based on a Physical Insight,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28231. [CrossRef]
Lever, J. H., and Weaver, D. S., 1982, “A Theoretical Model for the Fluidelastic Instability in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 104(3), pp. 104–147. [CrossRef]
Lever, J., and Weaver, D., 1986, “On the Stability of Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles, Part II: Numerical Results and Comparison With Experiments,” J. Sound Vib., 107(3), pp. 393–410. [CrossRef]
Yetisir, M., and Weaver, D., 1993, “An Unsteady Theory for Fluidelastic Instability in an Array of Flexible Tubes in Crossflow. Part 1: Theory,” J. Fluids Struct., 7(7), pp. 751–766. [CrossRef]
Yetisir, M., and Weaver, D., 1993, “An Unsteady Theory for Fluidelastic Instability in an Array of Flexible Tubes in Crossflow. Part 2: Results and Comparison With Experiments,” J. Fluids Struct., 7(7), pp. 767–782. [CrossRef]
Hassan, M., and Hayder, M., 2008, “Modelling of Fluidelastic Vibrations of Heat Exchanger Tubes With Loose Supports,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(10), pp. 2507–2520. [CrossRef]
Hassan, M., and Hossen, A., 2010, “Time Domain Models for Damping-Controlled Fluidelastic Instability Forces in Tubes With Loose Supports,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 132(4), p. 041302. [CrossRef]
Hassan, M., and Mohany, A., 2013, “Fluidelastic Instability Modelling of Loosely Supported Multi-Span U-Tubes in Nuclear Steam Generators,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 135(1), p. 011306. [CrossRef]
Tanaka, H., Takahara, S., and Nagasaki, J., 1980, “Unsteady Fluid Dynamic Force on Tube Bundle and Its Dynamic Effect on Vibration,” Flow-Induced Vibration of Power Plant Components, ASME, San Francisco, CA, p. 77.
Chen, S. S., Cai, Y., and Srikantiah, G. S., 1998, “Fluid Damping Controlled Instability of Tubes in Crossflow,” J. Sound Vib., 217(5), pp. 883–907. [CrossRef]
Rogers, R., and Pick, R., 1977, “Factors Associated With Support Plate Forces Due to Heat Exchanger Tube Vibratory Contact,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 44(2), pp. 247–253. [CrossRef]
Hassan, M., and Rogers, R., 2005, “Friction Modelling of Preloaded Tube Contact Dynamics,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 235(2), pp. 2349–2357. [CrossRef]
Taylor, C. E., and Pettigrew, M. J., 2000, “Random Excitation Forces in Heat Exchanger Tube Bundles,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 122(4), pp. 509–514. [CrossRef]
Haslinger, K. H., and Steininger, D., 1995, “Experimental Characterization of Sliding and Impact Friction Coefficients Between Steam Generator Tubes and AVB Supports,” J. Sound Vib., 181(5), pp. 851–871. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Tube-support model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The streamwise response waveform for a preloaded tube (0.55 N) with 0.12 mm clearance and friction coefficient of 0.2. (a) and (c) U = 3.5 m/s; (b) and (d) U = 4.2 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of turbulence level on streamwise response of a preloaded tube (1.0 N) with 0.01 mm clearance and friction coefficient of 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of the coefficient of friction on the streamwise response of a preloaded tube (1.11 N) with clearance of 0.01 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of tube-support preload on the streamwise response of a tube with a clearance of 0.01 mm and kinematic friction coefficient of 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of varying support clearance for a centered tube (no preload) and coefficient of friction of 0.2. (a) Streamwise response and (b) transverse response.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Datum case for tube response, no friction, and the tube centered (no preload). (a) Streamwise response and (b) transverse response.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Response spectra for the streamwise (a) and (b) and transverse (c) and (d) directions: (a) and (c) 1 m/s; (b) and (d) 7 m/s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In