0
Research Papers: Operations, Applications and Components

Applicability of the ASME Exemption Curve for Chinese Pressure Vessel Steel Q345R

[+] Author and Article Information
Qingfeng Cui

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: cqf_mail@163.com

Hu Hui

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: huihu@ecust.edu.cn

PeiNing Li

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: lpn_mail@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 6, 2014; final manuscript received May 13, 2015; published online August 6, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Allen C. Smith.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 137(6), 061602 (Aug 06, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-14-1128; doi: 10.1115/1.4030673 History: Received August 06, 2014

Q345R steel is the most commonly used material in fabrication of the pressure vessels and boilers in China, due to its excellent properties. In 2010, ASME code case 2642 accepted Q345R steel for use in construction of pressure vessels. The code case specified impact test exemption curve A for the impact test requirements for Q345R. However, this provision severely limits the application of this material at low temperature, since most of the minimum design metal temperature (MDMT) of curve A is above the freezing point. In this paper, a series of tests (such as uniaxial tensile test, impact test, and fracture toughness test) were carried out at low temperature to investigate the mechanical properties of Q345R steel plates with thickness of 36–80 mm. This study of low temperature usage of Q345R steel was conducted using the fracture mechanics assessment procedure of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. The fracture toughness is given by master curve (MC) method in the transition regime. The results show that Q345R can be used at lower temperature and that classifying Q345R steel into curve D is appropriate.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

ASME, 2007, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Osage, D. A. , 2007, “ASME Section VIII—Division 2 Criteria and Commentary,” ASME PTB-1 2007, ASME, New York.
Farr, J. R. , and Jawad, M. H. , 2001, Guide Book for the Design of ASME VIII Section Pressure Vessels, 2nd ed., ASME Press, New York, pp. 15–20.
Selz, A. , 1988, “New Toughness Rules in Section VIII, Division 1 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Code,” 88-PVP-8, ASME, New York.
Osage, D. A. , and Prager, M. , 2012, “Technical Basis of Material Toughness Requirements in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 134(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Prager, M. , Osage, D. A. , Staats, J. , and Macejko, B. , 2010, Development of Material Fracture Toughness Rules for the ASME B&PV Code, Section VIII, Division 2 (WRC Bulletin, Vol. 528), The Welding Research Council, New York.
Prager, M. , 2007, Impact Testing Exemption Curves for Low Temperature Operation of Pressure Piping, Pressure Vessel Research Council, New York.
Antalffy, L. P. , Hajovsky, J. J. , Miller, III, G. A. , Millet, B. J. , Pfeifer, J. A. , and West, G. T. , 2006, Comparison of Pressure Vessel Codes ASME Section VIII and EN13445, ASME Standard Technology, New York.
ASME, 2005, Code Case 2506-1, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
ASME, 2010, Code Case 2642, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Jiangyang, Q. , Yinpei, W. , and Zengdian, L. , 2000, “Brittle–Ductile Transition Temperature Characterization Elastic–Plastic Fracture Toughness Ji of 16MnR Steel,” Phys. Test. Chem. Anal., Part A, 36(12), pp. 531–534.
Jiangyang, Q. , Yinpei, W. , Zengdian, L. , and Jin, C. , 2000, “Fracture Toughness and Minimum Usage Temperature of the Spherical Vessel Steel,” China Pet. Mach., 28(3), pp. 18–20.
API 579-1/ASME FFS-1, 2007, Fitness-For-Service, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
ASTM E23, 2007, Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM E1921, 2012, Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, T0, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Sailors, R. H. , and Corten, T. H. , 1972, “Relationship Between Material Fracture Toughness Using Fracture Mechanics and Transition Temperature Tests,” National Symposium Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 514, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 164–191.
Barsom, J. M. , and Rolfe, S. T. , 1970, “Correlations Between KIC and Charpy V-Notch Test Results in the Transition-Temperature Range,” Impact Testing of Metals: STP 466, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 281–302.
Wallin, K. , Saario, T. , Törrönen, K. , and Forsten, J. , 1984, “Mechanism-Based Statistical Evaluation of the ASME Reference Fracture Toughness Curve,” 5th International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology, San Francisco, CA, Sept. 9–14, pp. 966–974.
Wallin, K. , 1984, “The Scatter in KIC Results,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 19(6), pp. 1085–1093. [CrossRef]
Wallin, K. , 1985, “The Size Effect in KIC Results,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 22(1), pp. 149–163. [CrossRef]
Wallin, K. , 1999, “Statistical Re-Evaluation of the ASME KIC and KIR Fracture Toughness Reference Curves,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 193(3), pp. 317–326. [CrossRef]
IAEA, 2005, “Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, Technical Report No. N629.
BS7910, 2005, Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structure, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
Eurofit.net, 1999, “Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure (SINTAP)—Final Revision,” Brite-Euram Programme, EU-Project BE 95-1426.
Raju, I. S. , and Newman, J. C. J. , 1981, “An Empirical Stress-Intensity Factor Equation for the Surface Crack,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 15(1–2), pp. 185–192.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Impact test exemption curves in ASME VIII-1 UCS66

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Yield and ultimate strength of Q345R steel at different temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Charpy impact energy of Q345R steel at different temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Envelope of allowable Kmax during precracking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dimensions of the 1T-SE(B) specimen and photograph of the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fracture toughness comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Assessment results of exemption curve D (AW)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Toughness ratio Kr changing with different R/t

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Assessment results of plate and cylinder

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In