0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

Deterministic and Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis for Structural Integrity Assessment of Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel

[+] Author and Article Information
Kuan-Rong Huang

National Chung-Shan Institute of Science
and Technology,
No. 481, 6th Neighborhood, Sec. Jia'an,
Zhongzheng Rd., Longtan Dist.,
Taoyuan City 32546, Taiwan
e-mail: d94543005@ntu.edu.tw

Chin-Cheng Huang

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research,
No. 1000, Wenhua Rd.,
Jiaan Village, Longtan Township,
Taoyuan County 32546, Taiwan
e-mail: cchuang@iner.gov.tw

Hsiung-Wei Chou

Institute of Nuclear Energy Research,
No. 1000, Wenhua Rd.,
Jiaan Village, Longtan Township,
Taoyuan County 32546, Taiwan
e-mail: hwchou@iner.gov.tw

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 4, 2015; final manuscript received September 28, 2015; published online February 8, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kunio Hasegawa.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031202 (Feb 08, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1089; doi: 10.1115/1.4032110 History: Received May 04, 2015; Revised September 28, 2015

Cumulative radiation embrittlement is one of the main causes for the degradation of pressurized water reactor (PWR) reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) over their long-term operations. To assess structural reliability of degraded reactor vessels, the FAVOR code from the Oak Ridge National Laboratories of the U.S. is employed to perform probabilistic fracture analysis for existing Taiwan domestic PWR reactor vessels with consideration of irradiation embrittlement effects. The plant specific parameters of the analyzed reactor vessel associated with assumed design transients are both considered as the load conditions in this work. Furthermore, two overcooling transients of steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) and pressurized thermal shock (PTS) addressed in the USNRC/EPRI benchmark problems are also taken into account. The computed low failure probabilities can demonstrate the structural reliability of the analyzed reactor vessel for its both license base and extended operations. This work is helpful for the risk assessment and aging management of operating PWR RPVs and can also be referred as its regulatory basis in Taiwan.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Pugh, C. E. , Bass, B. R. , and Dickson, T. L. , 2007, “ Role of Probabilistic Analysis in Integrity Assessments of Reactor Pressure Vessels Exposed to Pressurized Thermal-Shock Conditions,” Eng. Failure Anal., 14(3), pp. 501–507. [CrossRef]
Onizawa, K. , Nishikawa, H. , and Itoh, H. , 2010, “ Development of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Codes for Reactor Pressure Vessels and Piping Considering Welding Residual Stress,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 87, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Chen, B. Y. , Huang, C. C. , Chou, H. W. , Liu, R. F. , and Lin, H. C. , 2012, “ Boiling Water Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Evaluation by Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 135(1), p. 011206. [CrossRef]
Qian, G. , and Niffenegger, M. , 2013, “ Procedures, Methods and Computer Codes for the Probabilistic Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessels Subjected to Pressurized Thermal Shocks,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 258, pp. 35–50. [CrossRef]
Cheverton, R. D. , and Ball, D. G. , 1984, “ A Deterministic and Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Code for Applications to Pressure Vessels,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, Paper No. NUREG/CR-3618.
Simonen, F. A. , Johnson, K. I. , Liebetrau, A. M. , Engel, D. W. , and Simonen, E. P. , 1986, “ VISTA-II a Computer Code for Predicting the Probability of Reactor Pressure Vessel Failure,” Pacific Northwest Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, WA, Paper No. NUREG/CR-4486.
Dickson, T. L. , 1994, “ A Fracture Mechanics Analysis Code for Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel—Release 9401,” Paper No. ORNL/NRC/LTR/2094/1.
Odette, G. R. , and Lucas, G. E. , 2001, “ Embrittlement of Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessels,” J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc., 53(7), pp. 18–22. [CrossRef]
Williams, P. T. , Dickson, T. L. , and Yin, S. , 2010, “ Fracture Analysis of Vessels-Oak Ridge FAVOR, v09.1, Computer Code: Theory and Implementation of Algorithms, Methods, and Correlations,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, Paper No. ORNL/TM-2010/5.
Simonen, F. A. , Doctor, S. R. , Schuster, G. J. , and Heasler, P. G. , 2003, “ A Generalized Procedure for Generating Flaw-Related Inputs for the FAVOR Code,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, Paper No. NUREG/CR-6817.
ASME, 2010, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec. XI, Appendix G, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
T.P.C, 1986, Final Safety Analysis Report of Maanshan Nuclear Power Station Units l and 2, Taiwan Power Company, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Balkey, K. , Witt, F. J. , and Bishop, B. A. , 1995, “ Documentation of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Codes Used for Reactor Pressure Vessels Subjected to Pressurized Thermal Shock Loading,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Paper No. EPRI TR-105001.
Chen, C. Y. , et al. , 1999, “ Analysis of Capsule W From the Taiwan Power Company Maanshan Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program,” Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Taiwan, R.O.C., Paper No. INER-T2583.
Hayes, E. T. , 2007, Maanshan Unit 1 RPV Fluence Evaluation to Support the MUR Uprate Program, Rev. 0., CN-REA-07-3, Westinghouse, Pittsburgh, PA.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1988, Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Materials, Regulatory Guide 1.99, Rev. 2, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
Singer, L. R. , 1982, Taiwan Power Company Maanshan Unit No. 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program, WCAP-10014, Westinghouse, Pittsburgh, PA.
Eason, E. D. , Odette, G. R. , Nanstad, R. K. , and Yamamoto, T. , 2007, “ A Physically Based Correlation of Irradiation-Induced Transition Temperature Shifts for RPV Steels,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, Paper No. ORNL/TM-2006/530.
Title 10, Section 50.61(a), 2010, “Alternative Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events,” of the Code of Federal Regulations, Federal Register, Vol. 75, No. 1.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration comparison of aKIc and ASME KIc

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The configuration of RPV beltline region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time histories of temperature and pressure for the LOCA event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time histories of temperature and pressure for the MSLB event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Time histories of temperature and pressure for loss-of-power event 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time histories of temperature and pressure for loss-of-power event 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time histories of temperature and pressure for the PTS event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Time histories of temperature and pressure for the SGTR event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Time histories of the applied KI and relative temperature, T − RTNDT, at the crack tip in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the loss-of-power event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Time histories of the applied KI and relative temperature, T − RTNDT, at the crack tip in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the LOCA event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Time histories of the applied KI and relative temperature, T − RTNDT, at the crack tip in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the PTS event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Time histories of the applied KI and relative temperature, T − RTNDT, at the crack tip in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the SGTR event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Illustration of the applied KI time history and the Weibull KIc statistical model considering different RTNDTs in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the PTS event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Illustration of the applied KI time history and the Weibull KIc statistical model considering different RTNDTs in the case of the RPV at 54 EFPY subjected to the PTS even

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In