0
Research Papers: Seismic Engineering

Seismic Assessment of Petrochemical Piping Systems Using a Performance-Based Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Oreste S. Bursi

Department of Civil, Environment, and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento,
Via Mesiano 77,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: Oreste.bursi@unitn.it

Fabrizio Paolacci

Department of Engineering,
University Roma Tre,
Via Vito Volterra 62,
Rome 00146, Italy
e-mail: fabrizio.paolacci@uniroma3.it

Md Shahin Reza

Department of Civil, Environment, and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento,
Via Mesiano 77,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: md.shahin.reza@unitn.it

Silvia Alessandri

Department of Engineering,
University Roma Tre,
Via Vito Volterra 62,
Rome 00146, Italy
e-mail: alessandri.silvia@uniroma3.it

Nicola Tondini

Department of Civil, Environment, and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Trento,
Via Mesiano 77,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: nicola.tondini@unitn.it

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 3, 2015; final manuscript received November 6, 2015; published online February 8, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Chong-Shien Tsai.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031801 (Feb 08, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1151; doi: 10.1115/1.4032111 History: Received July 03, 2015; Revised November 06, 2015

The need of enhanced seismic analysis and design rules for petrochemical piping systems is widely recognized, where the allowable stress design method is still the customary practice. This paper presents an up-to-date performance-based seismic analysis (PBSA) of piping systems. The concept of performance-based analysis is introduced and a link between limit states and earthquake levels is proposed, exemplifying international code prescriptions. A brief review on seismic design criteria of piping systems is then provided by identifying the main critical issues. Finally, the actual application of the performance-based approach is illustrated through nonlinear seismic analyses of two realistic petrochemical piping systems.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sezen, H. , and Whittaker, A. S. , 2006, “ Seismic Performance of Industrial Facilities Affected by the 1999 Turkey Earthquake,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(1), pp. 28–36. [CrossRef]
Krausmann, E. , Cruz, A. M. , and Affeltranger, B. , 2010, “ The Impact of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on Industrial Facilities,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 23(2), pp. 242–248. [CrossRef]
Zare, M. R. , and Wilkson, S. , 2010, “ Resilience of Wastewater Pipelines in Earthquakes,” 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 25–29, pp. 6577–6586.
Paolacci, F. , Giannini, R. , and Angelis, M. D. , 2013, “ Seismic Response Mitigation of Chemical Plant Components by Passive Control Systems,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 26(5), pp. 924–935. [CrossRef]
Vathi, M. , Karamanos, S. , Kapogiannis, I. A. , and Spillopoulos, K. V. , 2015, “ Performance Criteria for Liquid Storage Tanks and Piping Systems Subjected to Seismic Loading,” ASME Paper No. PVP2015-45700.
EN 1998-4, 2006, Eurocode 8-Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance–Part 4: Silos, Tanks and Pipelines, CEN, Brussels.
Paolacci, F. , Reza, M. S. , and Bursi, O. S. , 2011, “ Seismic Analysis and Component Design of Refinery Piping Systems,” 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, COMPDYN 2011, Corfu, Greece, May 25–28.
Reza, M. S. , Bursi, O. S. , Paolacci, F. , and Kumar, A. , 2014, “ Enhanced Seismic Performance of Non-Standard Bolted Flange Joints for Petrochemical Piping Systems,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 30, pp. 124–136. [CrossRef]
Paolacci, F. , Reza, M. S. , Bursi, O. S. , Gresnit, N. , and Kumar, A. , 2013, “ Main Issues on the Seismic Design of Industrial Piping Systems and Components,” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97642.
EN 13480-3, 2002, Metallic Industrial Piping–Part 3: Design and Calculation, CEN, Brussels.
ASME B31.1, 2001, Power Piping, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
ASME B31.3, 2006, Process Piping, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
ASCE/SEI 7-05, 2005, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
EN 1998-1, 2005, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance–Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, CEN, Brussels.
NEA/CSNI/R(2007)17, 2008, “Differences in Approach Between Nuclear and Conventional Seismic Standards With Regard to Hazard Definition,” CSNI Integrity and Ageing Working Group, Nuclear Energy Agency Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
NFPA 59A, 2013, “ Standards for the Production, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG),” National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.
Structural Engineers Association of California, 1995, Vision 2000-A Framework for Performance-Based Design, California Office of Emergency Services, Sacramento, CA.
Norme Tecniche, 2008, “ Norme Techniche per le costruzioni,” DM Infrastrutture, 14 January 2008 (in Italian).
2011, “ Arrête du 24 janvier 2011 fixant les regles parasismiques applicables a certaines installations classes,” DEVP1102251A, Ministère de l’écologie du développement durable des transports et du logement, J. Off. République Française, Texte 14 sur 239.
D'Amico, V. , Meletti, C. , and Martinelli, F. , 2012, “ Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment in the High-Risk Area of South-Eastern Sicily (Italy),” Boll. Geofis. Teor. Appl., 53(1), pp. 19–36.
Azizpour, O. , and Hosseisni, M. , 2009, “ A Verification of ASCE Recommended Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation and Design of Combination Structures in Petrochemical Facilities,” J. Appl. Sci., 9(20), pp. 3609–3628. [CrossRef]
DeGrassi, G. , Nie, J. , and Hofmayer, C. , 2008, “ Seismic Analysis of Large-Scale Piping Systems for the JNES-NUPEC Ultimate Strength Piping Test Program,” U.S. NRC NUREG/CR-6983, BNL-NUREG-81548-2008.
Karamanos, S. A. , Tsouvalas, D. , and Gresnigt, A. M. , 2006, “ Ultimate Bending Capacity and Buckling of Pressurized 90 Deg Steel Elbows,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 128(3), pp. 348–356. [CrossRef]
Bursi, O. S. , Abbiati, G. , Caracoglia, L. , and Reza, M. S. , 2014, “ Effects of Uncertainties in Boundary Conditions on Dynamic Characteristics of Industrial Plant Components,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28177.
Okeil, A. , and Tung, C. , 1996, “ Effects of Ductility on Seismic Response of Piping Systems and Their Implication on Design and Qualification,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 166(1), pp. 69–83. [CrossRef]
Touboul, F. , Blay, N. , Sollogoub, P. , and Chapuliot, S. , 2006, “ Enhanced Seismic Criteria for Piping,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 236(1), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Liu, B. , Liu, X. J. , and Zhang, H. , 2009, “ Strain-Based Design Criteria of Pipelines,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 22(6), pp. 884–888. [CrossRef]
DNV-OS-F101, 2000, “ Submarine Pipeline Systems[S],” Høvik, Norway.
CSA-Z662, 2007, “ Canadian Standards Association. Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems,” Exdale, ON, Canada.
Bursi, O. S. , Reza, M. S. , Abbiati, G. , and Paolacci, F. , 2015, “ Performance-Based Earthquake Evaluation of a Full-Scale Petrochemical Piping System,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 33, pp. 10–22. [CrossRef]
SAP2000, 2004, Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Three-Dimensional Structures, v9, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
Hibbit, H. D. , Karlsson, B. I. , and Sorensen , 2003, Theory Manual, ABAQUS Version 6.3, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Providence, RI.
Varelis, G. E. , Pappa, P. , and Karamanos, S. A. , 2011, “ Finite Element Analysis of Industrial Steel Elbows Under Strong Cyclic Loading,” ASME Paper No. PVP2011-57260.
ASCE, 2005, Guidelines for the Design of Buried Steel Pipe (With Addenda Through February 2005), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
FEMA-273, 1997, NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Building Seismic Safety Council, FEMA, Washington, DC.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Code Case N-411-1, 1986, Alternative Damping Values for Response Spectra Analysis of Class 1, 2 and 3 Piping. Section III, Division 1, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
MIDAS [2010], 2010, “ Gen 2010 (v1.1),” Midas Information Technology Co. Ltd.
Iervolino, I. , Galasso, C. , and Cosenza, E. , 2009, “ REXEL: Computer Aided Record Selection for Code-Based Seismic Structural Analysis,” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 8(2), pp. 339–362. [CrossRef]
Vamvatsikos, D. , and Cornell, C. A. , 2002, “ Incremental Dynamic Analysis,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), pp. 491–514. [CrossRef]
Bursi, O. S. , Reza, M. S. , Paolacci, F. , and Kumar, A. , 2012, “ Seismic Performance of Bolted Flange Joints in Piping Systems for Oil and Gas Industries,” 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, Sept. 24–28.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

PBSA concept after [17]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) A 3D FE model of the support structure plus the piping system, (b) specifications of the piping system, and (c) dimensions of the support structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Mode #15 and Mode #16 of the structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Input earthquake accelerogram, (b) response spectrum of the accelerogram, and (c) envelops of maximum and minimum moments about Z axis in the piping system at CLS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The piping system considered in this CS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fiber discretization of an element section of the support structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dynamic pushover curves of the piping system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum stress in the pipes at several bays in comparison with stress limits

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) Stress in the support structure and (b) moment-curvature at section A for Acc. #1 at SSE

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In