0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Overview of NIST Activities on Subsize and Miniaturized Charpy Specimens: Correlations With Full-Size Specimens and Verification Specimens for Small-Scale Pendulum Machines

[+] Author and Article Information
Enrico Lucon

National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Applied Chemicals and Materials Division,
325 Broadway,
Boulder, CO 80305
e-mail: enrico.lucon@nist.gov

Chris N. McCowan

National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Applied Chemicals and Materials Division,
325 Broadway,
Boulder, CO 80305
e-mail: chrismccowan81@gmail.com

Raymond L. Santoyo

National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Applied Chemicals and Materials Division,
325 Broadway,
Boulder, CO 80305
e-mail: raymond.santoyo@nist.gov

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 26, 2015; final manuscript received January 4, 2016; published online February 8, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Osamu Watanabe.This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031405 (Feb 08, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1173; doi: 10.1115/1.4032474 History: Received July 26, 2015; Revised January 04, 2016

NIST in Boulder, CO investigated the correlations between impact test results obtained from standard, full-size Charpy V-notch (CVN) specimens and specimens with reduced thickness (subsize Charpy V-notch specimens (SCVN)) or reduced or scaled cross section dimensions (miniaturized Charpy V-notch specimens (MCVN)). A database of instrumented impact test results was generated from four line pipe steels: two quenched alloy steels, a tempered alloy steel, and a 18 Ni maraging steel. Correlations between specimen types were established and compared with the previously published relationships, considering absorbed energy (KV), ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT), and upper shelf energy (USE). Acceptable correlations were found for the different parameters, even though the uncertainty of predictions appears exacerbated by the expected significant experimental scatter. Furthermore, we report on the development of MCVN specimens for the indirect verification of small-scale pendulum machines (with potential energies between 15 J and 50 J), which cannot be verified with full-size verification specimens. Small-scale pendulum machines can now be verified at room temperature with certified reference specimens of KLST type (3 mm × 4 mm × 27 mm), supplied by NIST at three certified KV levels (low energy (LL), 1.59 J; high energy (HH), 5.64 J; and super-high (SH) energy, 10.05 J). These specimens can also be used to verify the performance of instrumented Charpy strikers through certified maximum force values. Certified reference values for both KV and maximum force were established by means of an interlaboratory comparison (Round-Robin), which involved nine qualified and experienced international laboratories.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Towers, O. L. , 1986, “ Testing Sub-Size Charpy Specimens—Part 3: The Adequacy of Current Code Requirements,” Met. Constr., 18, pp. 319R–325R.
Lucon, E. , McCowan, C. N. , and Santoyo, R. L. , 2014, “ Impact Characterization of Line Pipe Steels by Means of Standard, Sub-Size and Miniaturized Charpy Specimens,” NIST, Boulder, CO, NIST Technical Note 1865.
Lucon, E. , McCowan, C. N. , and Santoyo, R. L. , 2014, “ Impact Characterization of 4340 and T200 Steels by Means of Standard, Sub-Size and Miniaturized Charpy Specimens,” NIST, Boulder, CO, NIST Technical Note 1858.
ASTM E23-12c, “ Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM Book of Standards, Vol. 03.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Oldfield, W. , 1975, “ Curve Fitting Impact Test Data: A Statistical Procedure,” ASTM Standardization News, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 24–29.
ASTM E2298-13a, “ Standard Test Method for Instrumented Impact Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM Book of Standards, Vol. 03.01, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
ISO 14556:2000, Steel—Charpy V-Notch Pendulum Impact Test—Instrumented Test Method, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Zeno, R. S. , and Dolby, J. L. , 1953, “ The Effect of Specimen Geometry on Impact Transition Temperature,” Weld. Res., pp. 190s–197s.
Zeno, R. S. , 1956, “ Effect of Specimen Width on the Notched Bar Impact Properties of Quenched-and-Tempered and Normalized Steels,” Symposium on Impact Testing, F. Tatnall , ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM STP 176, pp. 59–69.
Curll, C. H. , and Orner, G. M. , 1958, “ Correlation of Selected Subsize Charpy Bars Versus the Standard Charpy Bar,” Watertown Arsenal Laboratories, Watertown, MA, Technical Report No. 112/91.
Curll, C. H. , 1959, “ Subsize Charpy Correlation With Standard Charpy,” Watertown Arsenal Laboratories, Watertown, MA, Technical Report No. 112/95.
McNicol, R. C. , 1965, “ Correlation of Charpy Test Results for Standard and Nonstandard Size Specimens,” Weld. Res., pp. 383s–393s.
Towers, O. L. , 1983, “ Charpy V-Notch Tests: Influences of Striker Geometry and of Specimen Thickness,” The Welding Institute, Cambridge, UK, Research Report No. 219/1983.
Towers, O. L. , 1986, “ Testing Sub-Size Charpy Specimens—Part 1: The Influence of Thickness on the Ductile/Brittle Transition,” Met. Constr., 18, pp. 171R–176R.
Wallin, K. , 1994, “ Methodology for Selecting Charpy Toughness Criteria for Thin High Strength Steels—Part 1: Determining the Fracture Toughness,” Jernkontorets Forskning, Espoo, Finland, Report No. 4013/89.
TWI Knowledge Summary, 2011, Sub-Size Charpy Specimens, The Engineering Institution for Welding and Joining Professionals, TWI, Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Corwin, W. R. , Klueh, R. L. , and Vitek, J. M. , 1984, “ Effect of Specimen Size and Nickel Content on the Impact Properties of 12 Cr-1 MoVW Ferritic Steel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 122(1–3), pp. 343–348. [CrossRef]
Corwin, W. R. , and Hougland, A. M. , 1986, “ Effect of Specimen Size and Material Condition on the Charpy Impact Properties of 9Cr-1Mo-V-Nb Steel,” The Use of Small-Scale Specimens for Testing Irradiated Material, W. R. Corwin , and G. E. Lucas , eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, ASTM STP 888, pp. 325–338.
Lucas, G. E. , Odette, G. R. , Sheckherd, J. W. , McConnell, P. , and Perrin, J. , 1986, “ Subsized Bend and Charpy V Notch Specimens for Irradiated Testing,” The Use of Small-Scale Specimens for Testing Irradiated Material, W. R. Corwin , and G. E. Lucas , eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, ASTM STP 888, pp. 304–324.
Lucas, G. E. , Odette, G. R. , Sheckherd, J. W. , and Krishnadev, M. R. , 1986, “ Recent Progress in Subsized Charpy Impact Specimen Testing for Fusion Reactor Materials Development,” Fusion Technol., 10(3P2A), pp. 728–733.
Louden, B. S. , Kumar, A. S. , Garner, F. A. , Hamilton, M. L. , and Hu, W. L. , 1988, “ The Influence of Specimen Size on Charpy Impact Testing of Unirradiated HT-9,” J. Nucl. Mater., 155–157(2), pp. 662–667. [CrossRef]
Kayano, H. , Kurishita, H. , Kimura, A. , Narui, M. , Yamazaki, M. , and Suzuki, Y. , 1991, “ Charpy Impact Testing Using Miniature Specimens and Its Application to the Study of Irradiation Behavior of Low-Activation Ferritic Steels,” J. Nucl. Mater., 179–181(1), pp. 425–488. [CrossRef]
Sokolov, M. A. , and Alexander, D. J. , 1997, “ An Improved Correlation Procedure for Subsize and Full-Size Charpy Impact Specimen Data,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, Report No. NUREG/CR-6379, ORNL-6888.
Lucon, E. , Chaouadi, R. , Fabry, A. , Puzzolante, J.-L. , and van Walle, E. , 2000, “ Characterizing Material Properties by the Use of Full-Size and Subsize Charpy Tests: An Overview of Different Correlation Procedures,” Pendulum Impact Testing: A Century of Progress, T. A. Siewert , and M. P. Manahan , eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM STP 1380, pp. 146–163.
ISO 5725-2:1994, Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results—Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ASTM E691-14, “ Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method,” ASTM Book of Standards, Vol. 14.02, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
McCowan, C. N. , Siewert, T. A. , and Vigliotti, D. P. , 2003, “ The NIST Charpy V-Notch Verification Program: Overview and Operating Procedures,” Charpy Verification Program: Reports Covering 1989-2002, NIST Boulder, CO, Technical Note 1500-9, pp. 3–42.
Lucon, E. , McCowan, C. N. , Santoyo, R. L. , and Splett, J. D. , 2013, “ Certification Report for SRM 2216, 2218, 2219: KLST (Miniaturized) Charpy V-Notch Impact Specimens,” NIST, Boulder, CO, Special Publication No. 260-180.
Lucon, E. , McCowan, C. N. , Santoyo, R. L. , and Splett, J. D. , 2015, “ Certified KLST Miniaturized Charpy Specimens for the Indirect Verification of Small-Scale Impact Machines,” Small Specimen Test Techniques, Vol. 6, M. A. Sokolov , and E. Lucon , eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM STP 1576, pp. 1–20.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Filtered NIST database of transition temperature shifts as a function of ligament cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between DBTTs calculated for LL141, HH143, and SH38

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Transition temperature shifts between CVN and SCVN/MCVN specimens, as a function of specimen cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Calculated transition temperature shifts as a function of specimen thickness, and comparison with Eqs. (2) and (3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

ΔT0.25J/mm2 and ΔT0.5J/mm2 versus specimen thickness, and comparison with Eqs. (2) and (3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison between ΔDBTTKV, ΔDBTTLE, and ΔFATT50

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison between ΔT0.25J/mm2 and ΔT0.5J/mm2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Filtered NIST database of transition temperature shifts, and comparison with Eqs. (2) and (3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

DBTTKV values calculated for X52 and LL141

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Energy densities for CVN, SCVN, and MCVN specimens

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Energy density ratio as a function of SCVN/MCVN cross-sectional area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison between Eq.(12) and NIST results from CVN and KLST tests of line pipe steels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Geometrical and empirical NFs for SCVN and MCVN specimens

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In