0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Instrumentation Development and Validation for an Experimental Two-Phase Blowdown Facility

[+] Author and Article Information
Ouajih Hamouda

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: hamoudo@mcmaster.ca

David S. Weaver

Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: weaverds@mcmaster.ca

Jovica Riznic

Fellow ASME
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC),
Ottawa, ON K1P 5S9, Canada
e-mail: jovica.riznic@canada.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 3, 2015; final manuscript received January 13, 2016; published online February 23, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Tomomichi Nakamura.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031304 (Feb 23, 2016) (13 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1176; doi: 10.1115/1.4032650 History: Received August 03, 2015; Revised January 13, 2016

An experimental facility was designed and built to study the loading on steam generator tubes during a blowdown. The facility used refrigerant R-134a and measurements were taken for static and dynamic pressures as well as tube loading and temperatures. Commissioning experiments indicated that the off-the-shelf dynamic pressure transducers and load cells could not take the mechanical and thermal shock loading caused by the blowdown and produced spurious results of no value. This paper presents the instrumentation problems found, explains why they occurred, describes the remedial procedures employed, and outlines the instrumentation validation methodologies developed. The success of the instrumentation development is demonstrated in a series of experiments designed to assess the rapid transient measurement system.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schewe, G. , and Steinhoff, C. , 2007, “ Force Measurements on a Circular Cylinder in a Cryogenic Ludwieg-Tube Using Piezoelectric Transducers,” J. Exp. Fluids, 42(3), pp. 489–494. [CrossRef]
Walter, P. L. , 2004, “ Air-Blast and the Science of Dynamic Pressure Measurements,” Sound Vib., 38(12), pp. 10–17.
Walter, P. L. , 2006, “ Validating the Data Before the Structural Model,” Exp. Tech., 30(6), pp. 56–59. [CrossRef]
Hamouda, O. , Weaver, D. S. , and Riznic, J. , 2013, “ Commissioning Tests for an Experimental Study of Steam Generator Tube Loading During Blowdown,” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97809.
Hamouda, O. , Weaver, D. S. , and Riznic, J. , 2014, “ Instrumentation Development and Validation for an Experimental Study of Steam Generator Tube Loading During Blowdown,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28137.
Hamouda, O. , 2015, “ An Experimental Study of Steam Generator Tube Loading during a Two-Phase Blowdown,” Ph.D. thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Blevins, R. , 1979, Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
Tijsseling, A. , 1996, “ Fluid-Structure Interaction in Liquid-Filled Pipe Systems: A Review,” J. Fluids Struct., 10(2), pp. 109–146. [CrossRef]
Chao, T. , and Shepherd, J. , 2004, “ Comparison of Fracture Response of Preflawed Tubes Under Internal Static and Detonation Loading,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 126(3), pp. 345–353. [CrossRef]
Baschuk, J. , West, A. , and Leitch, B. , 2013, “ Small Scale Burst Facility: Experimental Investigation of Fluid-Structure Interaction in a PHWR,” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97422.
Van Bokhorst, E. , Webber, T. , Van der Putte, J. , Smeulers, J. , and Remans, D. , 2014, “ The Impact of Emergency Release in LNG Transfer,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28126.
Kang, K. , Park, H. , Cho, S. , Choi, N. , Bae, S. , Lee, S. , Kim, Y. , Choi, K. , Baek, W. , and Kim, M. , 2011, “ Experimental Study on the Blowdown Load During the Steam Generator Feedwater Line Break Accident in the Evolutionary Pressurized Water Reactor,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, 38(5), pp. 953–963. [CrossRef]
Winters, W., Jr. , and Merte, H., Jr. , 1979, “ Experiments and Nonequilibrium Analysis of Pipe Blowdown,” Nucl. Sci. Eng., 69(3), pp. 411–429.
Lee, S. , Bae, C. , Prucka, R. , Fernandes, G. , Filipi, Z. , and Assanis, D. , 2005, “ Quantification of Thermal Shock in a Piezoelectric Pressure Transducer,” SAE Trans., 114, pp. 1370–1381.
Dénos, R. , 2002, “ Influence of Temperature Transients and Centrifugal Force on Fast-Response Pressure Transducers,” J. Exp. Fluids, 33(2), pp. 256–264. [CrossRef]
Sieverding, C. H. , Arts, T. , Dénos, R. , and Brouckaert, J. F. , 2000, “ Measurement Techniques for Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines,” J. Exp. Fluids, 28(4), pp. 285–321. [CrossRef]
Woodward, J. L. , and Mudan, K. S. , 1991, “ Liquid and Gas Discharge Rates Through Holes in Process Vessels,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 4(3), pp. 161–165. [CrossRef]
Wylie, E. , Streeter, V. , and Suo, L. , 1993, Fluid Transients in Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Huber, M. , and Ely, J. , 1994, “ A Predictive Extended Corresponding States Model for Pure and Mixed Refrigerants Including an Equation of State for R134a,” Int. J. Refrig., 17(1), pp. 18–31. [CrossRef]
Huber, M. , and McLinden, M. , 1992, “ Thermodynamic Properties of R134a (1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane),” International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Conference (IRACC), West Lafayette, IN, July 14–17, Paper 184, pp. 453–462.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental apparatus for simulating a steam generator blowdown

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sample erroneous transient pressure measurement during commissioning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Spurious dynamic load measurements on the tube bundle during commissioning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Axial thrust loading due to sudden disk rupture: (a) t = 0 and (b) t = 0+

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Prototype device for pressure transducer isolation: photograph (top) and mounting configuration (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Output response of the dynamic pressure transducers dipped gently into a container of ice water with and without a layer of insulation coating applied

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Vibration isolated dynamic pressure during N2 commissioning test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Fine wire thermocouple assembly configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Dynamic load measurement design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Test section tube bundle dynamic load calibration curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of theoretical N2 vessel discharge pressure with actual blowdown measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of computed wave propagation timings with blowdown pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the measured and computed saturation temperatures and pressures during R-134a post blowdown two-phase equilibrium conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of the original and modified test section designs with no tube bundle

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In