Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Instrumentation Development and Validation for an Experimental Two-Phase Blowdown Facility

[+] Author and Article Information
Ouajih Hamouda

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: hamoudo@mcmaster.ca

David S. Weaver

Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
McMaster University,
Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada
e-mail: weaverds@mcmaster.ca

Jovica Riznic

Fellow ASME
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC),
Ottawa, ON K1P 5S9, Canada
e-mail: jovica.riznic@canada.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 3, 2015; final manuscript received January 13, 2016; published online February 23, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Tomomichi Nakamura.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031304 (Feb 23, 2016) (13 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1176; doi: 10.1115/1.4032650 History: Received August 03, 2015; Revised January 13, 2016

An experimental facility was designed and built to study the loading on steam generator tubes during a blowdown. The facility used refrigerant R-134a and measurements were taken for static and dynamic pressures as well as tube loading and temperatures. Commissioning experiments indicated that the off-the-shelf dynamic pressure transducers and load cells could not take the mechanical and thermal shock loading caused by the blowdown and produced spurious results of no value. This paper presents the instrumentation problems found, explains why they occurred, describes the remedial procedures employed, and outlines the instrumentation validation methodologies developed. The success of the instrumentation development is demonstrated in a series of experiments designed to assess the rapid transient measurement system.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental apparatus for simulating a steam generator blowdown

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sample erroneous transient pressure measurement during commissioning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Spurious dynamic load measurements on the tube bundle during commissioning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Axial thrust loading due to sudden disk rupture: (a) t = 0 and (b) t = 0+

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Prototype device for pressure transducer isolation: photograph (top) and mounting configuration (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Output response of the dynamic pressure transducers dipped gently into a container of ice water with and without a layer of insulation coating applied

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Vibration isolated dynamic pressure during N2 commissioning test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Fine wire thermocouple assembly configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Dynamic load measurement design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Test section tube bundle dynamic load calibration curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of theoretical N2 vessel discharge pressure with actual blowdown measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of computed wave propagation timings with blowdown pressure measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the measured and computed saturation temperatures and pressures during R-134a post blowdown two-phase equilibrium conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of the original and modified test section designs with no tube bundle




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In