0
Research Papers: Fluid-Structure Interaction

Study of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Heat Exchanger and Improve Their Energy Efficiency

[+] Author and Article Information
Nasir Koosha

Department of Energy Engineering,
Islamic Azad University,
South Tehran Branch,
Tehran, Iran

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 20, 2015; final manuscript received January 7, 2016; published online February 25, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Osamu Watanabe.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(3), 031305 (Feb 25, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1192; doi: 10.1115/1.4032705 History: Received August 20, 2015; Revised January 07, 2016

In this study, two rows of fins from a fin-tube plate recuperator heat exchanger with two different materials, ceramic and steel, have been simulated by cfx software. First, by using experimental data that are in access, the independency from network and the confirmation of pattern authenticity have been checked. Equations from the equations of steady-state (SST) model k–ω have been used for applying turbulence terms in dominant. After network stabilization in greatest Reynolds number, the flow in the recuperator heat exchanger has been studied for two other Reynolds numbers. From the simulations, it is concluded that by increasing Reynolds number the temperature of fins' surfaces, outlet fluid temperature, and the temperature of tubes' surfaces will be increased, but totally the amount of overall heat transfer in time unit will be increased by the increase in Reynolds number. Also, it is observed that changing the material from steel to ceramic does not have that much difference for heat transfer in flow in low temperatures but the temperature of fins' surfaces for different materials and similar boundary status is different.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Tutar, M. , and Akkoca, A. , 2002, “ A Computational Study of Effects of Different Geometrical Parameters on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in a Wavy and Plain Fin and Tube Heat Exchanger,” ESDA 6th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Istanbul, Turkey, Vol. 39, pp. 1346–1398.
Mehmet, S. H. , Riza, D. A. , and Esref, B. , 2007, “ 3D Numerical Study on the Correlation Between Variable Inclined Fin Angles and Thermal Behaviour in Plate Fin-Tube Heat Exchanger,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 27(11–12), pp. 1806–1816.
Aytunc, E. , Baris, Õ. , Levent, B. , and Zafer, I. , 2005, “ Effect of Geometrical Parameters on Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics of Plate Fin and Tube Heat Exchangers,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 25(14–15), pp. 2421–2431. [CrossRef]
Khudheyer, A. F. , and Mahmoud, M. S. , 2011, “ Numerical Analysis of Fin-Tube Plate Heat Exchanger by Using CFD Technique,” J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 37, pp. 173–196.
Dorazio, R. E. , Ferri, J. L. , and Gonzalez, J. M. , 1984, “ The GTE Ceramic Recuperator Heat Exchanger for High Temperature Waste Heat Recovery,” Houston, TX, Apr. 15–18.
Wang, C. C. , Chang, Y. J. , Chung, H. Y. , and Lin, Y. T. , 1996, “ Sensible Heat and Friction Characteristics Plate Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers Having Plane Fins,” Int. J. Refrig., 19(4), pp. 223–230. [CrossRef]
Young, S. B. , Bjerklie, J. W. , and York, W. A. , 1980, “ High Temperature Heat Recovery Systems Using Ceramic Recuperators,” Second Industrial Energy Technology Conference (IETC), Houston, TX, Apr. 13–16, pp. 35–56.
Mcdonald, C. F. , 2003, “ Recuperator Considerations for Future Higher Efficiency Microturbines,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 23(12), pp. 1463–1487. [CrossRef]
Paeng, J. G. , Yoon, Y. H. , Kim, K. H. , and Yoon, K. S. , 2010, “ Theoretical and Numerical Analyses of a Ceramic Monolith Heat Exchanger,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 24(7), pp. 1545–1551. [CrossRef]
Liang, H. X. , Wang, Q. W. , and Luo, L. Q. , 2005, “ Numerical Simulation of Gas Flow and Heat Transfer in Cross-Wavy Primary Surface Channel for Microturbine Recuperators,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68292.
Utriainen, E. , and Sunden, B. , 2000, “ Numerical Analysis of a Primary Surface Trapezoidal Cross Wavy Duct,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 10(6), pp. 634–648. [CrossRef]
He, Y. L. , Tao, W. Q. , Song, F. Q. , and Zhang, W. , 2005, “ Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Heat Transfer Characteristics of Plain Plate Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers From View Point of Field Synergy Principle,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 26(3), pp. 459–473. [CrossRef]
Tao, Y. B. , He, Y. L. , Huan, G. J. , and Wu, Z. G. , 2007, “ Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Wavy Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers and Field Synergy Principle Analysis,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 50(5–6), pp. 1163–1175. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Industrial model thermal convertor associated with a view of the arrangement of tube of recuperator heat exchanger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

This section that contains two tubes of the heat exchanger is the recuperators heat exchanger. Two hot liquids flow in pipes which transfer heat to the cold gas flow duct, which gives.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Range of solution includes boundary conditions and developed volume

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

In the below figure fluid area, meshing is indicated from front view and in the above figure the magnified images from two parts determined by red rectangular have been indicated, number of elements 120,600 and the number of knots are 132,512

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

In the below figure meshing of fluid area from top view and in the above figure the magnified figure from determined part with red rectangle, related to tube part have been indicated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

View of the side of the fluid networking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Surface temperature contour from front view, Re = 6200

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Contour of fluid temperature in outlet of side view (left figure), temperature contour of bottom tube surface from top view (right figure), Re = 6200. This figure shows three views on the map is under investigation in recuperator heat exchanger.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Temperature diagram in different levels, Re = 6200

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Speed diagram in different levels, Re = 6200

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Temperature diagrams in different levels for two Reynolds numbers of 6200 and 2900

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Velocity diagrams at different levels for two Reynolds numbers of 6200 and 2900

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The plane flow lines speed values in 6200 and 2900 Reynolds numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Fluid temperature contour between two blades in different Reynolds numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Fluid velocity contour between two blades in different Reynolds numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Blade surface temperature contour in various Reynolds numbers

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In