0
Research Papers: Design and Analysis

A Numerical Study on CMOD Compliance for Single-Edge Notched Bending Specimens

[+] Author and Article Information
Enyang Wang

Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Western University,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
e-mails: ewang@altfuelcont.com;
enyang.wang@gmail.com

Wenxing Zhou

Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Western University,
1151 Richmond Street,
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
e-mail: wzhou@eng.uwo.ca

Guowu Shen

CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory,
Natural Resources Canada,
183 Longwood Road South,
Hamilton, ON L8P 0A5, Canada
e-mail: Guowu.Shen@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca

Daming Duan

TransCanada Pipeline Limited,
450 1st Street, SW,
Calgary, AB T2P 5H1, Canada
e-mail: da-ming_duan@transcanada.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 7, 2012; final manuscript received September 3, 2015; published online October 8, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Hardayal S. Mehta.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 138(2), 021204 (Oct 08, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: PVT-12-1122; doi: 10.1115/1.4031546 History: Received August 07, 2012; Revised September 03, 2015

Several well-known equations for estimating the crack length in the single-edge notched bending (SE(B)) specimens from the normalized crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) compliance are evaluated based on two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) finite element analyses (FEAs). Two-dimensional FEAs are first carried out to verify the reported accuracy and applicable ranges for each equation based on the plane strain models with six different crack lengths. Three-dimensional FEAs are then carried out to estimate the errors of prediction of equations that evaluate the crack length from the plane stress- and plane strain-based CMOD compliances. Both plane-sided and side-grooved models are included in 3D FEAs and have seven different thickness-to-width ratios. The error of prediction of a given equation is largely impacted by the thickness-to-width ratio, the crack length, the presence of side grooves, and the use of the plane stress- or plane strain-normalized CMOD compliance. Based on the errors of prediction, the relevance of the actual state of stress in the ligament of the SE(B) specimens to the plane strain condition or the plane stress condition is inferred. Knowledge of the relevance of the plane stress condition or the plane strain condition can be used to select the corresponding CMOD compliance in crack length-CMOD equations, and, therefore, the corresponding predictive accuracy can be improved.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Clarke, G. A. , Andrews, W. R. , Paris, P. C. , and Schmidt, D. W. , 1976, “ Single Specimen Tests for JIC Determination,” Mechanics of Crack Growth, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 27–42.
Clarke, G. A. , and Landes, J. D. , 1979, “ Evaluation of the J-Integral for the Compact Specimen,” J. Test. Eval., 7(5), pp. 264–269. [CrossRef]
ASTM, 2011, “ ASTM E1820-11: Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness,” Annual Book of Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Zhu, X. K. , and Leis, B. N. , 2008, “ Experimental Determination of J-R Curves Using SENB Specimens and P-CMOD Data,” ASME Paper No. PVP2008-61219.
Tada, H. , Paris, P. C. , and Irwin, G. R. , 1973, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, Del Research Corporation, Hellertown, PA.
Saxena, A. , and Hudak, S. J. , 1978, “ Review and Extension of Compliance Information for Common Crack Growth Specimens,” Int. J. Fract., 14(5), pp. 453–468. [CrossRef]
Wu, S. , 1984, “ Crack Length Calculation Formula for Three Point Bend Specimens,” Int. J. Fract., 24(1), pp. 33–38. [CrossRef]
Neale, B. K. , Curry, D. A. , Green, G. , Haigh, J. R. , and Akhurst, K. N. , 1984, A Procedure for the Determination of the Fracture Resistance of Ductile Steels, Central Electricity Generating Board, Leatherhead, Surrey, UK.
Kapp, J. A. , Leger, G. S. , and Gross, B. , 1983, “ Wide-Range Displacement Expressions for Standard Fracture Mechanics Specimens,” 16th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, M. F. Kanninen , and A. T. Hopper , eds., Columbus, OH, Aug. 15–17, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 27–44.
Kapp, J. A. , Leger, G. S. , and Gross, B. , 1983, “ J-R Curve Determination Using Precrack Charpy Specimens and the Load-Drop Method for Crack Growth Measurement,” 16th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, M. F. Kanninen , and A. T. Hopper , eds., Columbus, OH, Aug. 15–17, America Society of Testing and Material, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 281–292.
Towers, O. L. , and Garwood, S. J. , 1986, “ Influence of Crack Depth on Resistance Curves for Three-Point Bend Specimens in HY130,” Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 17, J. H. Underwood , R. Chait , C. W. Smith , D. P. Wilhelm , W. A. Andrews , and J. C. Newman , eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 454–484.
Steenkamp, P. A. J. M. , 1985, “ JR-Curve Testing of Three-Point Bend Specimens by the Unloading Compliance Method,” 18th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, D. T. Read , and R. P. Reed , eds., Boulder, CO, June 25–27, America Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 583–610.
Kapp, J. A. , 1991, “ Improved Wide Range Expressions for Displacements and Inverse Displacements for Standard Fracture Toughness Specimens,” J. Test. Eval., 19(1), pp. 45–54. [CrossRef]
Joyce, J. A. , 1992, “ J-Resistance Curve Testing of Short Crack Bend Specimens Using Unloading Compliance,” 22nd Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, H. A. Ernst , A. Saxena , and D. L. McDowell , eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 904–924.
Joyce, J. J. , Hackett, E. M. , and Roe, C. , 1993, “ Effects of Crack Depth and Mode of Loading on the J-R Curve Behavior of a High-Strength Steel,” Constraint Effect in Fracture, E. M. Hackett , K. H. Schwalbe , and R. H. Dodds , eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 239–263.
Shen, G. , Tyson, W. R. , and Gianetto, J. A. , 2012, “ CMOD Compliance of B×B Single Edge Bend Specimens,” ASME Paper No. PVP2012-78037.
ADINA, 2001, Theory and Modeling Guide, ADINA R&D, Inc., Watertown, MA.
ABAQUS, 2009, Abaqus Theory Manual, Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A quarter symmetric SE(B) specimen: (a) geometry and FE mesh of SE(B) specimens and (b) FE mesh around crack tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Plain-sided 3D models: (a) prediction based on BCE and (b) prediction based on BCE

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Side-grooved 3D models: (a) prediction based on BeCE and (b) prediction based on BeCE′

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In