0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Brittle Fracture Prevention Model for Pressure Based on Master Curve Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
QingFeng Cui

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: cqf_mail@163.com

Hu Hui

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: huihu@ecust.edu.cn

PeiNing Li

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science
and Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: lpn_mail@163.com

Feng Wang

Institute of Process Equipment,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
East China University of Science and
Technology,
130 Meilong Street,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: feng.wang1990@yahoo.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 17, 2015; final manuscript received May 4, 2016; published online August 5, 2016. Assoc. Editor: David L. Rudland.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(1), 011405 (Aug 05, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1275; doi: 10.1115/1.4033599 History: Received December 17, 2015; Revised May 04, 2016

The brittle fracture prevention model is of great importance to the safety of pressure vessels. Compared to the semi-empirical approach adopted in various pressure vessel standards, a model based on Master Curve technique is developed in this paper. Referring to ASME nuclear code, the safety features including the lower bound fracture toughness and a margin factor equal to 2 for the stress intensity factor produced by primary stress are adopted in the new model. The technical background of the brittle fracture model in ASME VIII-2 has been analyzed and discussed, and then its inappropriate items have been modified in the new model. Minimum design temperature curves, impact toughness requirements, and temperature adjustment for low stress condition are established on the basis of new model. The comparison with the relevant curves in ASME VIII-2 is also made. The applicability of the new model is verified by the measured fracture toughness and impact toughness data of several kinds of pressure vessel steels. The results suggest that the minimum design temperature and the impact test requirements derived by the new model are compatible with each other. More testing data of different steels to check this model is necessary for further engineering application.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Impact test exemption curves in ASME VIII-1 UCS66

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Assumed model with crack

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fracture toughness requirements for the AW condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fracture toughness requirements for the PWHT condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The minimum design temperature of Q345R for the AW condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The minimum design temperature of Q345R for the PWHT condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fracture toughness and impact energy of Q345R

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Prediction effect comparison of empirical correlations for Q345R

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Impact test requirements for the AW condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Impact test requirements for the PWHT condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the measured CVN data and the requirements for Q345R (heat1 and heat 2), 22NiMoCr37 and 20MnMoNi5. The fitting curve of measured value is marked by solid line, the AW requirement by dotted line, and the PWHT requirement by dashed line. (a) Q345R heat 1, (b) Q345R heat 2, (c) 22NiMoCr37, and (d) 20MnMoNi5.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Temperature adjustment for the low stress condition (parts in the AW condition)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Temperature adjustment for the low stress condition (parts in the PWHT condition)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Minimum design temperature under different Rts for the AW condition

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In