Research Papers: Operations, Applications and Components

Evaluation of Leakage Through Graphite-Based Compression Packing Rings

[+] Author and Article Information
Mehdi Kazeminia

Ecole de Technologie Superieure,
1100 Notre-Dame Ouest,
Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
e-mail: kazeminia.mehdi@gmail.com

Abdel-Hakim Bouzid

Fellow ASME
Ecole de Technologie Superieure,
1100 Notre-Dame Ouest,
Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
e-mail: hakim.bouzid@etsmtl.ca

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received June 18, 2015; final manuscript received May 30, 2016; published online August 24, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Haofeng Chen.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(1), 011602 (Aug 24, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1127; doi: 10.1115/1.4033937 History: Received June 18, 2015; Revised May 30, 2016

The prediction of leakage is one of the most challenging tasks when designing bolted flanged connections and industrial valves. Failure of these pressure vessel components can cause shutdowns but also accidents, loss of revenue, and environmental damages. With the strict regulations on fugitive emissions and environmental protection laws new tightness-based standards and design methods are being adopted to improve the sealing performance of bolted joints and valves. In addition, there is a practical interest in using a reliable correlation that could predict leak rates of one fluid on the basis of tests carried out with another on compressed packings. The paper presents an innovative approach to accurately predict and correlate leak rates in porous braided packing rings. The approach is based on Darcy–Klinkenberg to which a modified effective diffusion term is added to the equation. Experimentally measured gas flow rates were performed on a set of graphite-based compression packing rings with a large range of leak rates under isothermal steady conditions. Leakage from three different gases namely helium, nitrogen, and argon were used to validate the developed correlation. In the presence of the statistical properties of porous packings, the leak rates for different gases can be predicted with reasonable accuracy.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Knudsen, M. , 1909, “ The Law of the Molecular Flow and Viscosity of Gases Moving Through Tubes,” Ann. der Phys., 28(1), pp. 75–130. [CrossRef]
Muskat, M. , 1937, The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Kundt, A. , and Warburg, E. , 1875, “ Ueber Reibung und Warmeleitung verdunnter Gase,” Ann. der Phys., 231(7), pp. 337–365, 525–550. [CrossRef]
Klinkenberg, L. J. , 1941, “ The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquid and Gases,” API Drilling and Production Practice, API 11th Midyear Meeting, Tulsa, OK, May 19–22, pp. 200–213.
Civan, F. , 2010, “ Effective Correlation of Apparent Gas Permeability in Tight Porous Media,” Transp. Porous Media, 82(2), pp. 375–384. [CrossRef]
Ergun, S. , 1952, “ Fluid Flow Through Packed Columns,” J. Chem. Eng. Prog., 48(2), pp. 89–94.
Forchheimer, P. , 1901, “ Wasserbewegung Durch Boden” (“The Movement of Waters in the Earth”), Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ingenieuer, 45(1), pp. 1782–1788.
Chor, V. , and Li, W. , 2008, “ A Permeability Measurement System for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 18(1), pp. 208–216. [CrossRef]
Sun, H. , Yao, J. , Fan, D. , Wang, C. , and Sun, Z. , 2015, “ Gas Transport Mode Criteria in Ultra-Tight Porous Media,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 83, pp. 192–199. [CrossRef]
Zschiegner, S. , Russ, S. , Bunde, A. , and Karger, J. , 2007, “ Pore Opening Effects and Transport Diffusion in the Knudsen Regime in Comparison to Self-(or Tracer) Diffusion,” EPL, 78(2), p. 20001. [CrossRef]
Huizenga, D. G. , and Smith, D. M. , 1986, “ Knudsen Diffusion in Random Assemblages of Uniform Spheres,” AlChE J., 32(1), pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
Gao, X. , Diniz da Costa, J. , and Bhatia, S. , 2014, “ Understanding the Diffusion Tortuosity of Porous Materials: An Effective Medium Theory Perspective,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 110, pp. 55–71. [CrossRef]
Lito, P. F. , Cardoso, S. P. , Rodrigues, A. E. , and Silva, C. M. , 2015, “ Kinetic Modeling of Pure and Multicomponent Gas Permeation Through Microporous Membranes: Diffusion Mechanisms and Influence of Isotherm Types,” Sep. Purif. Rev., 44(4), pp. 283–307. [CrossRef]
Shou, D. , Fan, J. , and Mei, M. , 2014, “ An Analytical Model for Gas Diffusion Though Nanoscale and Microscale Fibrous Media,” Microfluid. Nanofluid., 16(1), pp. 381–389. [CrossRef]
Carrigy, N. B. , Pant, L. M. , Mitra, S. , and Secanell, M. , 2013, “ Knudsen Diffusivity and Permeability of PEMFC Microporous Coated Gas Diffusion Layers for Different Polytetrafluoroethylene Loadings,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 160(2), pp. F81–F89. [CrossRef]
Javadpour, F. , Fisher, D. , and Unsworth, M. , 2007, “ Nano Scale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 46(10), pp. 55–61. [CrossRef]
Beskok, A. , and Karniadakis, G. , 1999, “ A Model for Flows in Channels, Pipes, and Ducts at Micro and Nano Scales,” Microscale Thermophys. Eng., 3(1), pp. 43–77. [CrossRef]
Loyalka, S. K. , and Hamoodi, S. A. , 1990, “ Poiseuille Flow of a Rarefied Gas in a Cylindrical Tube: Solution of Linearized Boltzmann Equation,” Phys. Fluids, A2(11), pp. 2061–2065. [CrossRef]
Tison, S. A. , and Tilford, C. R. , 1993, “ Low Density Water Vapor Measurements,” The NIST Primary Standard and Instrument Response, NIST Internal Report No. 5241.
Plampin, M. , Illangasekare, T. , Sakaki, T. , and Pawar, R. , 2014, “ Experimental Study of Gas Evolution in Heterogeneous Shallow Subsurface Formations During Leakage of Stored CO2,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 22, pp. 47–62. [CrossRef]
Wang, G. , Ren, T. , Wang, K. , and Zhou, A. , 2014, “ Improved Apparent Permeability Models of Gas Flow in Coal With Klinkenber Effect,” Fuel, 128, pp. 53–61. [CrossRef]
Khoei, A. R. , and Vahab, M. , 2014, “ A Numerical Contact Algorithm in Saturated Porous Media With the Extended Finite Element Method,” Comput. Mech., 54(5), pp. 1089–1110. [CrossRef]
Ma, J. , Sanchez, J. P. , Wu, K. , Couples, G. D. , and Jiang, Z. , 2014, “ A Pore Network Model for Simulating Non-Ideal Gas Flow in Micro- and Nano-Porous Materials,” Fuel, 116, pp. 498–508. [CrossRef]
Hooman, K. , Tamayol, A. , Dahari, M. , Safaei, M. R. , Togun, H. , and Sadri, R. , 2014, “ A Theoretical Model to Predict Gas Permeability for Slip Flow Through a Porous Medium,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 70(1), pp. 71–76. [CrossRef]
Anez, L. , Calas-Etienne, S. , Primera, J. , and Woignier, T. , 2014, “ Gas and Liquid Permeability in Nano Composites Gels: Comparison of Knudsen and Klinkenberg Correction Factors,” Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 200, pp. 79–85. [CrossRef]
Schaaf, M. , and Schoeckle, F. , 2009, “ Technical Approach for the Reduction of Fugitive Emissions,” ASME Paper No. PVP2009-78125.
ANSI/ISA, 1999, “ Standard Method for the Evaluation of External leakage of Manual and Automated On-Off Valves,” American National Standards Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. ANSI/ISA-93.00.0.
API, 2011, “ Type Testing of Process Valve Packing for Fugitive Emissions,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. API-622.
API, 2011, “ Type Testing of Rising Stem Valves Equipped With Flexible Graphite Packing for Fugitive Emissions,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, D.C., Standard No. API-624.
ISO, 2006, “ Industrial Valves—Measurement, Test and Qualification Procedure for Fugitive Emissions—Part1: Classification System and Qualification Procedures for Type Testing of Valves,” International Standards Organization, Brussels, Belgium, Standard No. ISO-15848-1.
Masi, V. , Bouzid, A. H. , and Derenne, M. , 1998, “ Correlation Between Gases and Mass Leak Rate of Gasketing Materials,” 1998 ASME/JSME PVP Conference: Analysis of Bolted Joints, San Diego, CA, July 26–30, Vol. 367, pp. 17–24.
Jolly, P. , and Marchand, L. , 2009, “ Leakage Predictions for Static Gasket Based on Porous Media Theory,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 131(2), p. 021203. [CrossRef]
Grine, L. , and Bouzid, A. , 2011, “ Correlation of Gaseous Mass Leak Rates Through Micro and Nano-Porous Gaskets,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 133(2), p. 021402. [CrossRef]
Lasseux, D. , Jolly, P. , Jannot, Y. , and Omnes, E. S. B. , 2011, “ Permeability Measurement of Graphite Compression Packings,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 133(4), p. 041401. [CrossRef]
Xiao, J. R. , and Wei, J. , 1992, “ Diffusion Mechanism of Hydrocarbons in Zeolites Theory,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 47(5), pp. 1123–1141. [CrossRef]
Wang, C. T. , and Smith, J. M. , 1983, “ Tortuosity Factors for Diffusion in Catalyst pellets,” AlChE J., 29(1), pp. 132–136, [CrossRef]
Burggraaf, A. J. , and Cot, L. , 1996, Fundamentals of Inorganic Membranes Science and Technology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruthven, D. M. , 1984, Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes, Wiley, New York.
Arghavani, J. , Derenne, M. , and Marchand, L. , 2003, “ Effect of Surface Characteristics on Compressive Stress and Leakage Rate in Gasketed Flanged Joints,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 21(10), pp. 713–732. [CrossRef]
Chastanet, J. , Royer, P. , and Auriault, L. , 2004, “ Does Klinkenberg's Law Survive Upscaling?,” Transp. Porous Media, 56(2), pp. 171–198. [CrossRef]
Karniadakis, G. , Beskok, A. , and Aluru, N. , 2000, Microflows and Nanoflows, Fundamentals and Simulation, Springer, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

General configuration of a packed stuffing-box

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

General configuration of the test bench

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Leak rate versus gas inlet pressure for helium, argon, and nitrogen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Apparent permeability for helium, nitrogen, and argon at different gland stress levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Intrinsic permeability of helium obtained from intercepts of apparent permeability fitted lines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Intrinsic permeability versus gland stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Leak rate versus packing compression

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Diffusivity parameter versus the ratio of outlet and mean pressure using helium as reference gas

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Measured and predicted leak rate with helium

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Measured and predicted leak rate with argon

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Measured and predicted leak rate with nitrogen




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In