Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

Fatigue Performance Evaluations of Vehicle Toroidal Liquefied Petroleum Gas Fuel Tanks

[+] Author and Article Information
Fuat Kartal

Engineering and Architecture Faculties,
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Kastamonu University,
Kuzeykent/Kastamonu 37100, Turkey
e-mail: fuatkartal81@hotmail.com

Yasin Kisioglu

Faculty of Technology,
Biomedical Engineering,
Kocaeli University,
Kocaeli 41380, Turkey,
e-mail: ykisioglu@kocaeli.edu.tr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 13, 2015; final manuscript received December 25, 2016; published online March 17, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Hardayal S. Mehta.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(4), 041402 (Mar 17, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: PVT-15-1268; doi: 10.1115/1.4035976 History: Received December 13, 2015; Revised December 25, 2016

In this study, fatigue performances of the vehicle toroidal liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) fuel tanks were examined to estimate the fatigue life and its failure locations using both experimental and finite element analysis (FEA) methods. The experimental investigations performed as accelerated fatigue tests were carried out using a hydraulics test unit in which the tanks were internally pressurized by hydraulic oil. The LPG tanks were subjected to repeated cyclic pressure load varying from zero to service pressure (SP) of the tank. The computerized FEA modeling of these tanks were developed in three-dimensional (3D) form using nonuniform geometrical parameters and nonlinear material properties. These models were also subjected to zero-based high cycle fatigue pressure load considering the stress life approach. The FEA modeling process was also simulated in nonhomogeneous material conditions. Therefore, the fatigue life performance and failure location of the toroidal LPG fuel tanks were predicted using the computer-aided simulations and compared with the experimental results.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Japan Office of Trade and Investment Ombudsman, 1999, “ Acceptance of Pressurized LP Gas Fuel Supply Apparatus for Automobiles,” Resolution to Complaint to the Japan Economic Planning Agency, OTO No. 589.
TSE, 2004, “ Automotive LPG Components-Containers,” Turkish Standard Institute (TS), Ankara, Turkey, Standard No. TS 12095 EN 12805 (in Turkish).
Tchoupou, K. M. T. , and Fotsing, B. D. S. , 2015, “ Fatigue Equivalent Stress State Approach Validation in Non-Conservative Criteria: A Comparative Study,” Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., 12(13), pp. 2506–2519. [CrossRef]
Kisioglu, Y. , Brevick, J. R. , and Kinzel, G. L. , 2001, “ Determination of Burst Pressure and Locations of the DOT-39 Refrigerant Cylinders,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 123(2), pp. 240–247. [CrossRef]
Kisioglu, Y. , 2011, “ Burst Pressure Determination of Vehicle Toroidal Oval Cross-Section LPG Fuel Tanks,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 133(3), p. 031202. [CrossRef]
Kaptan, A. , and Kisioglu, Y. , 2007, “ Experimental of Burst Pressures and Failure Locations of Vehicle LPG Cylinders,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 84(7), pp. 451–459. [CrossRef]
Aksoley, M. E. , 2004, “ Examining the Burst Test Parameters Applied on LPG Tanks,” M.Sc. thesis, Gebze High Technology Institute, Gebze, Turkey (in Turkish).
Marzbanrad, J. , Paykani, A. , Afkar, A. , and Ghajar, M. , 2013, “ Finite Element Analysis of Composite High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Vessels,” J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 4(1), pp. 63–74.
Zu, L. , Zhang, D. , Xu, Y. , and Xiao, D. , 2012, “ Integral Design and Simulation of Composite Toroidal Hydrogen Storage Tanks,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(1), pp. 1027–1036. [CrossRef]
Kim, Y.-S. , Kim, L.-H. , and Park, J.-S. , 2011, “ The Effect of Composite Damage on Fatigue Life of the High Pressure Vessel for Natural Gas Vehicles,” Compos. Struct., 93(11), pp. 2963–2968. [CrossRef]
Kisioglu, Y. , Brevick, J. R. , and Kinzel, G. L. , 2005, “ Bottom End-Closure Design Optimization of DOT-39 Non-Refillable Refrigerant Cylinders,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 127(2), pp. 112–118. [CrossRef]
Giglio, M. , 2003, “ Fatigue Analysis of Different Types of Pressure Vessel Nozzle,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 80(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Rauscher, F. , 2003, “ Fatigue of Non-Welded Pressure Vessels Made of High Strength Steel,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 80(3), pp. 197–204. [CrossRef]
Alegre, J. M. , Bravo, P. M. , and Cuesta, I. I. , 2010, “ Fatigue Design of Wire-Wound Pressure Vessels Using ASME-API 579 Procedure,” Eng. Failure Anal., 17(4), pp. 748–759. [CrossRef]
Hossain, M. M. , and Seshadri, R. , 2010, “ Simplified Fitness-for-Service Assessment of Pressure Vessels and Piping Systems Containing Thermal Hot Spots and Corrosion Damage,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 87(7), pp. 381–388. [CrossRef]
Camara, S. , Bunsell, A. R. , and Thionnet, D. H. , 2011, “ Determination of Lifetime Probabilities of Carbon Fibre Composite Plates and Pressure Vessels for Hydrogen Storage,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(10), pp. 6031–6038. [CrossRef]
Chou, H. Y. , Bunsell, A. R. , and Thionnet, A. , 2012, “ Visual Indicator for the Detection of End-of-Life Criterion for Composite High Pressure Vessels for Hydrogen Storage,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(21), pp. 16247–16255. [CrossRef]
Song, L. , Xiaolong, J. , Hongjie, S. , Hongwei, S. , David, H. , and Xiaoping, Y. , 2013, “ Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Filament Wound CFRP Vessel Under Hydraulic and Atmospheric Fatigue Cycling,” Composites, Part B, 46, pp. 227–233. [CrossRef]
Wanga, X. H. , and Redekop, D. , 2011, “ Natural Frequencies Analysis of Moderately-Thick and Thick Toroidal Shells,” Procedia Eng., 14, pp. 636–640. [CrossRef]
Zu, L. , Koussios, S. , and Beukers, A. , 2010, “ A Novel Design Solution for Improving the Performance of Composite Toroidal Hydrogen Storage Tanks,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(19), pp. 14343–14350. [CrossRef]
Zhan, H. J. , and Redekop, D. , 2009, “ Static and Dynamic Loading of an Ovaloid Toroidal Tank,” Thin-Walled Struct., 47(6–7), pp. 760–767. [CrossRef]
Augustins, L. , 2013, “ An Empirical Multiaxial High Cycle Fatigue Criterion for Automotive Cylinder Head Design,” Eng. Failure Anal., 28, pp. 264–274. [CrossRef]
Santanna, H. M. , and Leal, M. F. , 2011, “ Practical Procedure to Assess Critical Defects in Pressure Vessels Subjected to Fatigue Loads,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 78(8), pp. 1669–1683. [CrossRef]
Spear, A. , and Ingraffea, A. , 2011, “ Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Growth in Thin, Aluminum-Alloy, Pressure Vessel Liner,” Procedia Eng., 10, pp. 686–691. [CrossRef]
Rudolph, J. , Schmitt, C. , and Weib, E. , 2002, “ Fatigue Lifetime Assessment for Welded Vessel Components,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 79(2), pp. 103–112. [CrossRef]
Koh, S. K. , 2002, “ Fatigue Damage Evaluation of a High Pressure Tube Steel Using Cyclic Strain Energy Density,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 79(12), pp. 791–798. [CrossRef]
Varvani-Farahani, M. R. , and Kianoush, M. , 2007, “ Fatigue Failure Assessment of Engineering Components Under Service Loading Conditions,” Mater. Des., 28(2), pp. 575–580. [CrossRef]
Marczewska, T. , Bednarek, A. , Marczewski, W. , Sosnowski, H. , and Jakubczak, J. , 2006, “ Practical Fatigue Analysis of Hydraulic Cylinders and Some Design Recommendations,” Int. J. Fatigue, 28(12), pp. 1739–1751. [CrossRef]
Erdemir Steel, 1997, “ Erdemir 6842 Steel Properties,” Erdemir Product Catalogue, Erdemir Group, Zonguldak, Turkey.
ANSYS, 2003, “ ANSYS User Manual, Swanson Analysis System, V 8.0,” ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Stephens, R. I. , Fatemi, A. , Stephens, R. R. , and Fuchs, H. O. , 2000, Metal Fatigue in Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The vehicle toroidal LPG fuel tank and its design parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Fatigue test equipments and (b) circuit diagram of the hydraulic system. 1, filter; 2, AC motor and hydraulic pump; 3, pressure gauge; 4, pressure relief valve; 5, check valve; 6, servohydraulic valve; 7, cycle counter; 8, the LPG tanks.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Results of the accelerated fatigue tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The fatigue failure locations of the torus tanks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The torispherical LPG tank: (a) 3D solid model and (b) FEA model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Orientations of the tensile test specimens and material properties of the toroidal LPG tank

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The S–N curve of the torus tank material

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Thickness variation of the toroidal LPG fuel tanks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The applied zero-based repeated pressure loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

(a) Fatigue life and (b) safety factor for the LPG tank

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The equivalent static stress distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Structural behavior of the LPG tank for selected nodes




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In