0
Technical Brief

Optimization of Piping Supports and Supporting Structure

[+] Author and Article Information
Kleio Avrithi

Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science
and Engineering Technology,
University of Houston-Downtown,
1 Main Street, Suite N707,
Houston, TX 77002
e-mail: avrithik@uhd.edu

Harrison Hyung Min Kim

Professor
Donald Biggar Willett Scholar
Department of Industrial and
Enterprise Systems Engineering (ISE),
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
104 South Mathews Avenue,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: hmkim@illinois.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 23, 2016; final manuscript received February 11, 2017; published online April 20, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Kunio Hasegawa.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(4), 044503 (Apr 20, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: PVT-16-1172; doi: 10.1115/1.4036144 History: Received September 23, 2016; Revised February 11, 2017

Optimization of piping supports is a well-known problem. The paper considers the optimization of piping supports with respect to cost and the loads transmitted to the supporting structural elements, when the orientation of the supporting structure is to be determined. This is the case, when new structural elements need to be added to the existing building structure to support components and piping systems that come as a new addition to a nuclear plant. The analytical target cascading (ATC) method is used for the optimization, combining the support loads from different piping analyses in a hierarchical framework. It is shown that the ATC method can be used for an optimized location of structural elements simultaneously supporting complex piping systems and implemented in a structural analysis software.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

NEC, 2015, “ Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide, Rev. 1,” Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC, Report No. NEI 12-06.
Chiba, T. , Fujii, I. , Tamayama, S. , and Hara, F. , 1996, Parametric Study of the Penalty Function in a Genetic Algorithm Applied to the Support Arrangement for Piping Systems, PVP Vol. 340, ASME, New York, pp. 249–257.
Gupta, A. , Kripakaran, P. , Mahinthakumar, G. , and Baugh, J. W. , 2005, “ Genetic Algorithm-Based Decision Support for Optimizing Seismic Response of Piping Systems,” J. Struct. Eng., 131(3), pp. 389–398. [CrossRef]
Hara, F. , and Iwasaki, A. , 1996, “ Optimum Design for Pipe-Support Allocation Against Seismic Loading,” Seismic Engineering, PVP Vol. 340, ASME, New York, pp. 259–268.
Collina, A. , Zanaboni, N. , and Belloli, M. , 2005, “ On the Optimization of Support Positioning and Stiffness for Piping Systems on Power Plants,” 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18), Beijing, China, Aug. 7–12, pp. 2445–2452.
Kim, H. , Michelena, N. , Papalambros, P. , and Jiang, T. , 2003, “ Target Cascading in Optimal System Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(3), pp. 474–480. [CrossRef]
Steuer, R. E. , 1986, Multicriteria Optimization–Theory, Computation, and Application, Wiley, New York.
Marler, R. T. , and Arora, J. S. , 2004, “ Survey of Multi-Objective Methods for Engineering,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 26(6), pp. 369–395. [CrossRef]
Koski, J. , and Silvennoinen, R. , 1987, “ Norm Methods and Partial Weighting in Multicriterion Optimization of Structures,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 24(6), pp. 1101–1121. [CrossRef]
ASME, 2004, “ Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components,” ASME B&PV Code, Section III, Division 1, Subsection NC, Class 2 Components, ASME, New York.
DST Computer Services SA, 2014, “ PIPESTRESS Version 3.8.0,” DST Computer Services SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
ASME, 2007, “ Power Piping, Code for Piping B31.1,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Martins, J. R. R. , and Lambe, A. B. , 2013, “ Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Survey of Architecture,” AIAA J., 51(9), pp. 2049–2075. [CrossRef]
Allison, J. , Walsh, D. , Kokkalaras, M. , Papalambros, P. Y. , and Cartmell, M. , 2006, “ Analytical Target Cascading in Aircraft Design,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-1325.
Choudhary, R. , Malkawi, A. , and Papalambros, P. Y. , 2005, “ Analytic Target Cascading in Simulation-Based System Design,” Autom. Constr., 14(4), pp. 551–568. [CrossRef]
Tosserams, S. , and Etnan, L. F. P. , 2008, “ Augmented Lagrangian Coordination for Distributed Optimal Design MDO,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 73(13), pp. 1885–1910. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Supports adjustment relevant to systems components for optimum design

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Boundary between piping support and supporting structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Structural element j = 1 fixed at end points i = 1 and i = 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

ATC decomposition in subsystems and components

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flowchart for optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Piping isometric view with optimized supports, showing physical points B and D from which the four beams need to pass

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Layout (X–Y) of beams based only on piping system 1 analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Layout (X–Y) of beams based only on piping system 2 analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Layout (X–Y) of beams based on the converged optimal solution using ATC

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In