0
Research Papers: Materials and Fabrication

High Temperature Fatigue of Welded Joints—Experimental Investigation and Local Analysis of Butt Welded Flat and Cruciform Specimens

[+] Author and Article Information
Kay Langschwager

Institute for Material Technology,
TU Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64283, Germany
e-mail: langschwager@mpa-ifw.tu-darmstadt.de

Jürgen Rudolph

AREVA GmbH,
Erlangen 91052, Germany
e-mail: rudolph.juergen@areva.com

Alfred Scholz

Institute for Material Technology,
TU Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64283, Germany
e-mail: Scholz@mpa-ifw.tu-darmstadt.de

Matthias Oechsner

Institute for Material Technology,
TU Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64283, Germany
e-mail: oechsner@mpa-ifw.tu-darmstadt.de

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received June 27, 2016; final manuscript received February 23, 2017; published online April 24, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Xian-Kui Zhu.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(4), 041408 (Apr 24, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: PVT-16-1099; doi: 10.1115/1.4036140 History: Received June 27, 2016; Revised February 23, 2017

Austenitic stainless steel of type X6CrNiNb18-10 exhibits advantageous mechanical and chemical properties and is a common material for numerous applications in the nuclear power plant and chemical industries. Besides the mechanical strain induced by high pressure, the fatigue life in welded pipelines is affected by additional thermomechanical strains due to thermal loading. The welding process mainly determines the geometry and metallurgical constitution of the welded joint. Therefore, the butt welds additionally influence the strain gradient along the component and reduce its lifetime. While the base and weld material are similar, they show different softening and hardening behavior, especially at ambient temperature. Cyclic hardening occurs in the base material, whereas cyclic softening can be observed in the weld material. The hardness distribution along the welded joint reveals no clear differentiation of the base material, the heat affected zone, and the weld material. The attributes of the individual materials cannot be transferred to the welded joint automatically. Thus, the analysis of the interaction between the materials along the welded joint is a main topic of this research. To this end, digital image correlation (DIC) is used for different kinds of specimens and load conditions. The position along the testing area at which fatigue failure occurs depends on the specimen type and the load condition but not on the temperature. Further, isothermal and anisothermal fatigue tests on welded cruciform specimens are presented. The common practice of the effective strain is discussed for the analyzed conditions.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kerntechnischer Ausschuss, 2013, “ Components of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary of Light Water Reactors, Part 2: Design and Analysis,” Kerntechnischer Ausschuss, Salzgitter, Germany, Standard No. KTA 3201.2 2013-11.
Deutsches Institut für Normung, 2013, “ Unfired Pressure Vessels—Part 3: Construction,” Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Standard No. DIN EN 13445-3:2013-12.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2007, “ Section III Division 1—Subsection NB: Class 1 Components; Rules for the Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components,” ASME, New York.
Bosch, A. , Lang, E. , Beier, H. T. , Vormwald, M. , Langschwager, K. , Scholz, A. , and Oechsner, M. , 2014, “ Ermüdungsnachweis für Unbearbeitete und Nachbearbeitete Schweißverbindungen Einschließend Thermozyklische, Elastisch-Plastische Beanspruchungen,” Final Report, IGF-Vorhaben-Nr. 17457 N.
Langschwager, K. , Bosch, A. , Lang, E. , Rudolph, J. , Vormwald, M. , Scholz, A. , and Oechsner, M. , 2014, “ Fatigue Behavior of Butt Weld Seams: Experimental Investigation and Numerical Simulation,” ASME Paper No. PVP2014-28787.
Schuler, X. , Herter, K.-H. , and Rudolph, J. , 2013, “ Derivation of Design Fatigue Curves for Austenitic Stainless Steel Grades 1.4541 and 1.4550 Within the German Nuclear Safety Standard KTA 3201.2,” ASME Paper No. PVP2013-97138.
Smaga, M. , Hahnenberg, F. , Sorich, A. , and Eifler, D. , 2011, “ Cyclic Deformation Behavior of Austenitic Steels in the Temperature Range −60 °C<=T <=550 °C,” Eng. Mater., 465, pp. 439–442.
Sorich, A. , Smaga, M. , and Eifler, D. , 2013, “ Influence of Loading Conditions on the Cyclic Deformation Behavior and Phase Transformation of the Austenitic Stainless Steel AISI 347 at Ambient Temperature and 300 °C,” 7th International Conference on Low Cycle Fatigue, Aachen, Germany, Sept. 9–11, pp. 33–38.
Molak, R. M. , Paradowski, K. , Brynk, T. , Ciupinski, L. , Pakiela, Z. , and Kurzydlowski, K. J. , 2009, “ Measurement of Mechanical Properties in a 316L Stainless Steel Welded Joint,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 86(1), pp. 43–47. [CrossRef]
Remes, H. , 2013, “ Strain-Based Approach to Fatigue Crack Initiation and Propagation in Welded Steel Joints With Arbitrary Notch Shape,” Int. J. Fatigue, 52, pp. 114–123. [CrossRef]
Madi, Y. , Matheron, P. , Recho, N. , and Mongabure, P. , 2004, “ Low Cycle Fatigue of Welded Joints: New Experimental Approach,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 228(1–3), pp. 161–177. [CrossRef]
Reynolds, A. P. , and Duvall, F. , 1999, “ Digital Image Correlation for Determination of Weld and Base Metal Constitutive Behavior,” Weld. Res. Suppl., 355(Suppl) pp. 355–360.
GOM mbH, 2009, “ ARAMIS Manual—Software,” GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Bauerbach, K. , Vormwald, M. , and Rudolph, J. , 2009, “ Fatigue Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Components Subjected to Thermal Cyclic Loading,” ASME Paper No. PVP2009-77450.
Hobbacher, A. , 2007, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
Radaj, D. , 1996, “ Review of Fatigue Strength Assessment of Nonwelded and Welded Structures Based on Local Parameters,” Int. J. Fatigue, 18(3), pp. 153–170. [CrossRef]
Rudolph, J. , Götz, A. , and Hilpert, R. , 2012, “ Regelwerkskonforme Bestimmung von Erschöpfungsgraden bei Allgemeinen Elasto-Plastischen Finite-Elemente-Analysen—Teil 1,” Technische Sicherheit, pp. 39–44, 7–8.
Bosch, A. , Rudolph, J. , and Vormwald, M. , 2015, “ Numerical Investigations of Seam Welds Under Low Cycle Fatigue—Proposal for Lifetime Estimation and Recommendations for Design With Commonly Used Guidelines,” ASME Paper No. PVP2015-45576.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of the uniaxial LCF and flat specimens, schematic representation of the weld above the transverse section in the case of the as-welded joint and the weld ground in accordance with normal practice at this application

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Measurement and sectioning of the welded semifinished pipes into various specimen types, standardized LCF specimens out of the base material and along the weld, as well as flat specimens with typical weld [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the types of load along the transverse section of pipe and representation of a microhardness profile (HV 0.5) along an as-welded joint in transverse section [5]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Representation of the hardening and softening behavior of selected specimens of the austenitic base and filler materials in their original state. Test temperature: 350 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Representation of the hardening and softening behavior of selected specimens of the austenitic base and filler materials in their original state. Test temperature: 25 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Test setup for uniaxial testing with a system for attendant DIC and a schematic representation of the displacement field within the test zone, ARAMIS system[4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Strain field in longitudinal direction as the result of the DIC for the welded round specimen under compression loading, virtual extensometer for validation of the measurements and for determination of the local strain at the incipient crack, εa = ±0.36%, Ni = 5037 cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison between mechanically controlled stress–strain hysteresis and global optically measured comparative hysteresis, as well as representation of the local stress–strain hysteresis at the crack, Ref. [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Results of the uniaxial LCF experiments on standardized round specimens for the base material, the weld filler and the welded state, KTA mean and design curves, and comparison between global control and actual local strain at ambient temperature [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Results of the uniaxial LCF experiments on standardized round specimens for the base material, the weld filler and the welded state, KTA mean, and design curves at higher temperatures [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Showing the different failure locations on the welded LCF round specimens dependent on the controlled strain amplitude at ambient temperature [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Results of the uniaxial LCF experiments on finished and unfinished flat specimens, KTA mean, and design curves at ambient temperature [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Results of the uniaxial LCF experiments on finished flat specimens, KTA mean, and design curves at high temperatures [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Longitudinal strain trajectory along a selected average path of a welded finished flat specimen under compression loading, failure location within the weld, originating at the face of the weld

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Results of the uniaxial LCF experiments on unfinished flat specimens, KTA mean, and design curves at high temperatures [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Illustration of a welded cruciform specimen with electropolished surface, prepared from a welded austenitic plate, geometry of the cruciform specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Test setup for biaxial testing under thermomechanical loads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Calculated effective strain along the cruciform specimen during tensile loading, schematic representation of the weld and the test zone and the virtual area of analysis Fa = ±35 kN, Ni = 3720 cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Results of the biaxial cruciform specimen tests for the welded state, KTA mean and design curve, as well as the comparison between global and actual locally occurring effective strain under TMF loading [4]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In