Research Papers: Operations, Applications and Components

Reliability Assessment of Failure Assessment Diagram Based Fitness for Service Procedure Including the Effect of Bias in Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Rohit Rastogi

Reactor Safety Division,
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
Mumbai 400085, India

Siddhartha Ghosh

Department of Civil Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay,
Mumbai 400076, India
e-mail: sghosh@civil.iitb.ac.in

A. K. Ghosh

Health Safety and Environment Group,
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
Mumbai 400085, India

K. K. Vaze

Raja Ramanna Fellow,
Department of Atomic Energy,
Mumbai 400085, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Pressure Vessel and Piping Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 12, 2017; final manuscript received June 30, 2017; published online August 2, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Steve J. Hensel.

J. Pressure Vessel Technol 139(5), 051602 (Aug 02, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: PVT-17-1048; doi: 10.1115/1.4037264 History: Received March 12, 2017; Revised June 30, 2017

This paper presents the estimation of the reliability levels associated with a cracked pipe found acceptable as per the failure assessment diagram (FAD) based acceptance criteria of ASME Section XI, Appendix H. This acceptance criterion is built on the concepts of fracture mechanics. The parameters which enter the acceptance criteria are piping geometry, applied loading, crack size, and the material properties (tensile and fracture). Most of these parameters are known to exhibit uncertainty in their values. The FAD used also has an associated modeling bias. The code addresses these uncertainties by providing a factor of safety on the applied load. The use of a common factor of safety for a variety of pipe sizes, crack configuration, load combination, and materials may not ensure consistent level of safety associated with the piping component being evaluated. This level of safety can be evaluated by using structural reliability concepts. This paper analyzes the reliability level which is achieved if a cracked pipe passes the acceptance criteria prescribed by the code. The reliability is evaluated for a range of pipe and crack geometry, different load combination, and different materials using Monte Carlo method. The realistic assessment of reliability also requires the assessment of modeling bias associated with the FAD. This bias is also evaluated using the results from the published fracture experiments.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Assessed points of experimental initiation load in pipes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mean value of Bmi for all experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Probability density function of Mapp, Mcr, and McrBm for the service level A loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Probability density function of Mapp, Mcr, and McrBm for the service level D loading




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In